So the attitude has nothing to do with it, since we both stated things as facts, and you only reply to me because you agree with him, even though he does not have a time machine either and stated things as facts. So you don't have any issue with people conjecturing without actual proof, yet you accused me for exactly that. Fine, I can't expect people to be consistent.
And how do you know that I'm just a consumer? And how does "being in tech world" makes any difference unless your area is exactly manufacturing costs of displays? Any developer would be technically someone in the tech world yet would have no clue about this issue including many people working for Apple. Are you working for a display manufacturer? If so, fine. Give me some details which I can't google myself about the manufacturing costs about different display sizes of 2007.
Otherwise, you have no more clue than anyone of us whether or not you are in the tech world.
How do you want me to respond to the other person. Seems like a waste of bandwidth to argue against someone I agree with. Should I have posted something like "I agree with you - but since we don't have a time machine we can't say this is true" ? Who does that?
I never said YOU were just a consumer. Are you trying to put words in my mouth?
/done discussing. I'm not going to go granular on the conversation with you. You have your opinion, I have mine. We can leave it at that.
Last edited: