That's what she said!
With the new tightly packed CCDs, their is a lot more noise generated.
But it seems to be the rage, or should I say bragging rights, these days.
Canadian version of the iPhone?

(*** ducks ****)
SMACK!
●<------ Your post. The point ------>●
Succinct way of putting it.
The cost of checking the applications isn't going to be particularly high. Most of it will be doable by an automated test suite.
The other half is checking the developer is legitimate which is covered by the $99/year.
Agree.
I don't see this as much of an issue.
Additionally, if Apple receives bad feedback about a particular developer or application, I am sure that the developer will get to feel the Apple love.
I actually overheard a sales assistant in Comet tell a customer that his old 6MP D-SLR was, in terms of picture quality, being superseded by £100 point-and-shoot 12MP cameras because they captured more pixels!
Unfortunately, based upon the simple logic that more is better, this methodology works.
It seems in the digital age, compared to the film age, many consumers don't understand pixel noise, F-stop, Aperture, and other camera settings like we used to have to know and understand.