Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Koss Pro/4AA were the very first headphones I yearned for (Circa 1970). I wonder who owns the patent/trademark/copyright to "Headphone"? It's not a "phone" but it is worn on the head.
Also used by thousands of radio DJ's. For those that don't know, the silver knob unscrews, and you can screw in a microphone.

View attachment 2034529A
 
  • Like
Reactions: Edsel
An all to familiar thing with Apple.

Apple discusses using another company's patent in a new product, but has them sign a no-lawsuit agreement under the guise of calling it a "confidentiality agreement".
Then Apple uses the patents anyway, making the all too familiar "the patents are invalid so we're not paying" claim.
Then countersues when the patent holder says "I think not" and sues Apple for infringement.
Then settles once they realize the patents are in fact valid, and Apple could be on the hook for more if a jury decides and awards triple damages for willful infringement plus attorney's fees to Koss.

Since it's a familiar thing, can you give three other examples?
 
I hope I beat Apple to this:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1982.JPG
    IMG_1982.JPG
    460 KB · Views: 71
There are no details on the settlement at this time, but the filing indicates that "all matters in controversy" have been resolved.
One of the conditions of filing a lawsuit should be disclosure of settlement terms.

It's not like we'd learn more, but we'd hear less about lawsuits that aren't going anywhere.
 
How many times have we seen Apple use this strategy?

Use tech without paying for patents. Wait to see if anyone notices and if you get sued, deal with it then.

Prepare to be attacked. You know that to many here Apple can do no wrong, and anyone suing is a money-grabbing patent troll that only wants a slice of the apple pie.
 
The Eastern District of Texas court system, along with the European Union parliament, would disagree with that. ;)

Seriously, I get what you are saying in that the deck is stacked in Apple's favor and eventually the cost of their legal team working on the case outweighs just paying off the defendant to make them go away, but that does not automatically mean the defendant's case always has full merit and Apple is always fully in the wrong, which so often seems to be the opinion of many in these cases.
This is the most real-life type of answer. Patent law is a special fish in the legal sea. Not always do you use the patents you file for, but you still file if you have something new, so no one else can use it without licensing it.

Often there are so many similarities and yet subtle differences that it really is difficult to prove or disprove, and rather than going to trial, it is financially better to settle than pay more in attorney fees and worse, punitive damages, if any.

TL;DR settling in a civil/patent lawsuit has very little to do with guilt or innocence.
 
Wow, this thread in 8 replies. I guess Apple can do whatever they want because they are bigger than those suing them.

Actually yes because the fines they dole out are absolutely nothing. It would be like giving us a $10 ticket.
 
Koss Pro/4AA were the very first headphones I yearned for (Circa 1970). I wonder who owns the patent/trademark/copyright to "Headphone"? It's not a "phone" but it is worn on the head.


Phonographs and gramophones aren't phones either. Edison has a lot to answer for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ericwn and Edsel
I believe I said this before: there are billions of people in the world and any two or more people can and will come up with similar ideas.

Bridges are a good example: they pretty much do the same thing but so many different styles.

Apple might have talked to these guys about their patients - then realized how ****** they were compared to what Apple was already developing in-house or Apple felt they could do better by building a similar system from the ground up. The end result might look the same, but what processes did each company take to get there.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.