Whilst I understand you revel and enjoy making your IPP work for you and that's fine
I was simply pointing out to the poster that there are far more capable options available, where they thought Apple was the only choice is simply untrue.
The poster would not know if the experience is better not as they are simply unaware of alternatives
Sometimes the simplicity of IPP can be an aid to productivity but equally the reverse can be true. The frustration for many of starting something on an IPP but having to finish off on a laptop is just a far too often occurrence.
Whilst having a more proficient device should guarantee a single use solution I agree it may not always be required or as simple to use.
If your lucky that an IPP meets your needs then that's good but lets not miss inform others that there are not alternatives that they may prefer or require a more complex device/solution.
I don’t think I am misinforming them of anything.
My stance has and always will be the same.
Since we are on the topic of iPad productivity, and since everyone has different needs, dismissing the value of the ipad outright just because it cannot be a laptop replacement for someone is counterproductive, because it assumes that everyone has the same needs as you, or that they are somehow not willing to put in the same amount of effort towards learning a new interface that you were.
Rather, the focus of the conversation ought to be on what the ipad can do, and what it does well, and (if applicable) what it can do better than a conventional laptop or even desktop.
Be honest and upfront, point out the limitations of the iPad where they exist, but also don’t forget to give the ipad due credit for the areas where it does shine. And the ipad has come a long way since it was first unveiled in 2010.
Let the reader be cognisant of the capabilities of the ipad, so he has a clearer picture of what it can and cannot do, such that he may make a more informed decision.
So at the end of the day, if he decides to get an ipad for say, photo editing, knowing fully well the drawbacks (ie: difficulty of importing photos into lightroom), but also aware that the benefits of the touchscreen display and lighter form factor of the iPad Pro, and is willing to put up with the aforementioned limitations because he believes the pros far outweigh the cons, then that’s ultimately his call to make.
To me, this is very reminiscent of the AirPods argument. So many people dismiss it outright because of its lacklustre sound quality (relative to other more premium headphones at any rate), but the truth is that they still sound pretty decent, and come with many other benefits (namely comfort and convenience) which, for the right user, more than outweighs the loss of sound quality.
Different strokes for different people.