Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
af953bde56ba96a74412681cf367974b415a3d43a366b957cf02404dcf4c7ed6.jpg
 
Comments here never disappointed if you’re looking for the most negative crap coming from commenters. As The Morning Show, if the show is not for you, it doesn’t mean it’s bad. It’s just not for you. To me this looks interesting and I’ll surely give it a chance. But hey, a nuanced, non-negative comment on MacRumors, it will disappear in the sea of negativity that is so common here.

So if someone watches the trailer and doesn't like it what is it you're suggesting they do? Not post their opinion? Sugarcoat it so it doesn't sound negative?
 
So if someone watches the trailer and doesn't like it what is it you're suggesting they do? Not post their opinion? Sugarcoat it so it doesn't sound negative?

There's a difference between posting an opinion or deeming it all trash, Apple is doomed blablabla. You could also say something like "okay, this is clearly not for me". But no, I haven't seen that. If you can't understand that (not so subtle) difference, well, in that case I can't help you.
 
This is your friendly reminder that not all content has to please everyone. Just like there's tons of content on Netflix, I won't watch but there are shows that seem tailor made for my tastes, AppleTV+ will have a variety of content for all sorts of audiences.

It doesn’t have to please everyone, but it MUST please me. All of it. Every show.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MLVC and lunarworks
if the show is not for you, it doesn’t mean it’s bad. It’s just not for you.

So when is Apple going to make a show that's for us?

Two trailers, two strikes.

If you include the pre-Apple TV "Planet of the Apps" that's three strikes.

$6 Billion paid to actors and producers with apparently $6 paid to writers.
 
Emily Dickinson lived early in the past century. An age when women were to be seen but not heard.

But the premise that one takes off this trailer, highlights a libertarian with modern 21st century behaviors.

The premise is laughable, but not in a good sense.

I was just waiting to see the character texting blue bubbles sprinkled with emojis on linen paper, listening to Apple Music on a vacuum-powered radio, and running yoga sessions guided by a tallcase clock.

That would be better comedy/s
[You could not make this up -- only Apple TV+ can.]
 
While MacRumors has always had naysayers (remember the famous iPod thread?), in the past several years, it's devolved into a cesspool of negativity and trolling. I spent some time putting users whose only contribution is incessant negavity or tired one liners and it's helped make this forum more tolerable but it's far from the Apple fan community it started out as.

that’s the entire internet. Just hate, negativity and trolling. It used to be you could have intelligent fun positive conversations on the internet. I miss those days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15ngcs1 and MLVC
I stopped watching the trailer 12 seconds in. Apple TV+: Tim Cook's waterloo...

So you don’t like shows involving rebellious, young women and/or specifically Emily Dickinson. Cool. That’s literally all you could have gleaned from that 12 seconds.
[doublepost=1566848295][/doublepost]
So when is Apple going to make a show that's for us?

Two trailers, two strikes.

If you include the pre-Apple TV "Planet of the Apps" that's three strikes.

$6 Billion paid to actors and producers with apparently $6 paid to writers.

Is that how you judge Netflix? Two random shows and you’ve decided they can’t do anything right? Must suck for you.
 
The life of someone who was completely obscure until she died? Dickenson was an agoraphobic shut in that was probably on the spectrum given her lack of interest in human contact. Not a very interesting story to tell....but maybe someone with talent could do it and find the beauty of her inspiration.

But the trailer is very disrespectful of Emily Dickeson's life story. She is just every teen girl ever filled with commonplace insipid rebellion. Thats boring and tasteless. Dickenson was a complicated likely conflicted person but her conflicts would not make for teen drama. They make for human drama of a rich nature. Nope - TEEN! Magazine!
 
Last edited:
So when is Apple going to make a show that's for us?

Two trailers, two strikes.

If you include the pre-Apple TV "Planet of the Apps" that's three strikes.

$6 Billion paid to actors and producers with apparently $6 paid to writers.

LOL. You speak as if "us" is universal here. I loved the last two Apple TV trailers of Good Morning America and Moon Race. This is the first dud for me, but then again I'm "totally, like" not the target audience of Dickinson. You stan?
 
Are you thinking the Lizzie McGuire reboot is going to be edgy? Or that She-Hulk will be the next Jessica Jones?
Do you really think She Hulk will be that bad?
[doublepost=1566848833][/doublepost]
Emily Dickinson lived early in the past century. An age when women were to be seen but not heard.

But the premise that one takes off this trailer, highlights a libertarian with modern 21st century behaviors.

The premise is laughable, but not in a good sense.
Every show made in Hollywood is 100% anachronistic. The BBC occasionally has shows that are not, but Hollywood almost never. Every character in every show acts like a modern day 25 year old Californian. Its weird.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rutterp83
So you don’t like shows involving rebellious, young women and/or specifically Emily Dickinson. Cool. That’s literally all you could have gleaned from that 12 seconds.
[doublepost=1566848295][/doublepost]

Is that how you judge Netflix? Two random shows and you’ve decided they can’t do anything right? Must suck for you.

When you only have like 5 shows though...
 
  • Like
Reactions: decypher44
Can we just shut comments down for these trailer premieres already? I'm tired or reading garbage comments in search of one useful one. They are all so dismissive and narrow minded. This show is clearly designed with and for young audiences in mind. It has a completely different sense of humor and take on history than any commenter in here seems to grasp. Most importantly, there is no such thing as predicting a killer show based on its trailer. Show me the greatest trailer ever and I can find you tons of viewers that hated it. Show me the worst trailer and I will find diehard fans of that movie or TV show.
You do realize you aren’t being forced to read comments, right?
 
No, it correlates with Apple's rise as a commodity brand. It really spiked when the iPhone brought in an audience who didn't choose Apple as a niche company that values design and simplicity but instead buy an iPhone because it's the most popular phone and then are surprised when Apple does things that follow its guiding principles and charge an according premium.

I know right? The avg person who post here seem to still think only men like tech and that Apple is tech company thar only caters to geek men who thought they were too cool for Windows.
 
So when is Apple going to make a show that's for us?

Two trailers, two strikes.

If you include the pre-Apple TV "Planet of the Apps" that's three strikes.

$6 Billion paid to actors and producers with apparently $6 paid to writers.

If you belong to the group which wants easy-to-repair Apple prodoucts and a desktop Mac with a great graphics card for CUDA and gaming, Apple is probably not making any shows for you.
 
Outside of Star Wars and Star Trek, sci-fi as a genre is nearly as niche as this show.

You do realize that milennial women are a large segment of the viewing audience. Many shows like this have done very well, and Apple feels the need to attract a diverse audience, not just middle aged white men.

See anything on CW, Gossip Girl, Pretty Little Liars, Dawson's Creek, etc. These shows keep getting made because people want to see them. Neither you nor I do, but I am open minded enough to realize that my worldview isn't universal.
 
So you’re Apple. You’ve got nothing but a few billion to spend to start your own content streaming company. You know people have different tastes. You also know what genre has dominated the top money grossing lists. You also need to charge 9.99 from the beginning no matter what. What do you do?

Well we must have a variety is what you say. Nope. Wrong answer. Now you have a library that might appeal to larger numbers but barely and with maybe one show?

Or you focus on that money making genre and hope to build a loyal core group of users who’ll have enough multiple shows from the beginning to be consistent monthly buyers. Apple could always expand later.

Doesn’t really matter. Apple chose variety. With hardly any content overall it’ll be slow going.

I dare they try variety! You say variety like its s
So you’re Apple. You’ve got nothing but a few billion to spend to start your own content streaming company. You know people have different tastes. You also know what genre has dominated the top money grossing lists. You also need to charge 9.99 from the beginning no matter what. What do you do?

Well we must have a variety is what you say. Nope. Wrong answer. Now you have a library that might appeal to larger numbers but barely and with maybe one show?

Or you focus on that money making genre and hope to build a loyal core group of users who’ll have enough multiple shows from the beginning to be consistent monthly buyers. Apple could always expand later.

Doesn’t really matter. Apple chose variety. With hardly any content overall it’ll be slow going.

You say Variety like its a dirty word. I guess you’d rather be spoonfed the same crap over and over instead of trying something new.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.