Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I have no idea where you live, but i cant think of anyplace i do business that doesn’t accept accept Apple Pay. Even the gas stations i go to have readers on the pumps.
Silicon Valley, ironically. Maybe it's because I live in Mountain View instead of Cupertino :p
 
Another timely article from AboveAvalon.


We are seeing a similar dynamic take place with Apple Watch. Legacy thinking is masking Apple Watch’s transformational attributes. The product is misunderstood as Apple competitors are unsure of the answers to basic questions such as, why are consumers buying Apple Watches?

Apple Watch’s ability to usher in a paradigm shift in computing isn’t about what ifs or hypotheticals. It's something that is already taking place. We have a growing list of ways Apple Watch is a different kind of computer, the likes of which we have never seen.

Instead of simply taking the existing app model and applying it to the wrist, a new way of consuming “apps” has developed. Subscriptions are naturally more applicable to something like an Apple Watch as customers find value in long-term targeting, monitoring, and data curation.

Apple Watch isn’t alone in ushering in this new era of computing. Other wearable devices designed to leverage the unique attributes of the body (wrists, ears, and eyes) have a role to play. The attributes that have allowed the Apple Watch to flourish on the wrist are being translated to allow AirPods to become a platform for bringing augmented hearing to the masses. In the future, a pair of eyeglasses will be able to add visual context to our surroundings.

Fitbit’s demise at the hands of Apple was no fluke. Watch and learn, everyone, for this is just the beginning.
 
I was thinking that that's 30 million less watch sales the other manufacturers are losing but I wonder how many Apple watches were bought by those who, like myself, had stopped wearing a watch due to always having their phone on them for the time? I hadn't worn a watch for years and am on my fourth Apple Watch.
 
I was thinking that that's 30 million less watch sales the other manufacturers are losing but I wonder how many Apple watches were bought by those who, like myself, had stopped wearing a watch due to always having their phone on them for the time? I hadn't worn a watch for years and am on my fourth Apple Watch.
And of that, how many people owned Timex, Casio, Seiko, and other non-Swiss brands.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marshall73
I haven't worn any of my regular watches since I got a Withings hybrid watch around 2 years ago, so I can see how sales in terms of numbers would be impacted.
 
I would easily have an AW by now if my work wasn't stupidly paranoid everyone is evil Dick Tracys trying to steal and sell everyone's SPI with a smartwatch somehow. Not going to buy something I can't even wear like half my waking hours. I mostly want it just to wave it for AP. Saw some guy use it a BJ's, coolest thing ever.
 
I wear my Omega just about every day. I think the Apple Watch is practical in its own way, but it is redundant for me since I always have my phone with me.

Also, I love the ticks and the sweeping mechanical movement of the seconds hand. I don’t get that satisfaction with an Apple Watch

I agree, I like it but aside from a few advantages with training it doesn't really offer anything for me. I also love the escapement of the Omega, there's something special and satisfying of the mechanical watch movement.
 
I agree, I like it but aside from a few advantages with training it doesn't really offer anything for me. I also love the escapement of the Omega, there's something special and satisfying of the mechanical watch movement.
I recently acquired a 1999 Omega Seamaster 300m Professional. I really can't explain it because people just don't understand. It's amazing to have a piece of modern engineering on your hand: a device that uses your movement to power itself and will run indefinitely without charging or winding.
 
servicing every few years!
Every few years? I keep seeing this pop up. I've had my Rolex for 14 years, worn it every day and it's never had an issue.

This is a pretty pointless article though. Two different items for two different markets.
 
Although on the other side of that coin, a very large number of people find that closing their rings helps motivate them to stay active. In that sense, although the value of the raw data my be of limited use to some, the increased activity is very beneficial to many. In my opinion anyway.

Thats a very valid point. Personally I don’t pay attention to the rings. I would love to see data on how many people stay motivated and for how many people it is merely a fad, such as the latest diet.
 
Thats a very valid point. Personally I don’t pay attention to the rings. I would love to see data on how many people stay motivated and for how many people it is merely a fad, such as the latest diet.
I am largely able to close my rings over the course of a normal workday. However, I am also currently staying away from running while I recover from a case of "runner's heel", and have not been jogging since December.

That said, wasn't there recently an article about gyms supporting the Apple Watch at their facilities? That strikes me as an example of how the Apple Watch can lead businesses to rethink their business model. It used to be that gyms operated by trying to get people to sign up for costly packages and then hoped that they were too lazy to show up at their gyms. Now, with this initiative, you are getting the consumer to actually want to turn up at your gym to exercise more frequently, thereby aligning the interests and motivations.

It will be fun to see what other industries and markets the Apple Watch will go on to reinvent (or marginalise) moving forward.
 
And in 5 years or sooner those apple watches will be in the landfill while that Rolex or other automatic watch will be keeping time for the next 100 years or more!! :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: AustinIllini
And in 5 years or sooner those apple watches will be in the landfill while that Rolex or other automatic watch will be keeping time for the next 100 years or more!! :)

Not discounting, of course, the utility one gets from having used the Apple Watch during that time, or that the money one spends on a Rolex is enough to pay for a lifetime of Apple watches.
 
Not discounting, of course, the utility one gets from having used the Apple Watch during that time, or that the money one spends on a Rolex is enough to pay for a lifetime of Apple watches.
It's amazing how all these Rolex wannabes suddenly get a religious fervor for environmentalism specifically about Apple Watches amongst all of the consumer goods in the world.
 
It's amazing how all these Rolex wannabes suddenly get a religious fervor for environmentalism specifically about Apple Watches amongst all of the consumer goods in the world.
Again. Completely missing the point.

Rolex wannabes? Please. A Timex will outlast an Apple Watch by several decades.
[automerge]1581263208[/automerge]
Not discounting, of course, the utility one gets from having used the Apple Watch during that time, or that the money one spends on a Rolex is enough to pay for a lifetime of Apple watches.
Except the Rolex will last multiple lifetimes and go to your kids and their kids.
[automerge]1581263251[/automerge]
So will your laptop, your iPad, your router, your iPhone and a myriad of other things you will use today.
Yup. Except my phone does anything I need Apple Watch to do so there's no reason to add all the nuisance of an Apple Watch.
 
I hope you find a mechanical watch that you can wear. Maybe then you'll understand.

From earlier in this thread:
Although I use an Apple Watch on a day-to-day basis because of the breadth of its utility, I'm also a fan of waterproof self-winding Swiss mechanical watches.

I have enjoyed my Omega Seamaster for three decades now.


For now, though, you're name calling and missing the point out of left field. Not a good way to debate on a forum.

You change the subject every time your current point is disproved. I am no longer going to respond to your vacillating arguments. Please be my guest and have the last word.
 
From earlier in this thread:


I have enjoyed my Omega Seamaster for three decades now.




You change the subject every time your current point is disproved. I am no longer going to respond to your vacillating arguments. Please be my guest and have the last word.

So why are you spewing insults?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.