My house is fifty years old. You lose.
Mine is 150 years old, you both lose.
My house is fifty years old. You lose.
My house is fifty years old. You lose.
I see them both as competition for your wrist.
Let’s say the Apple Watch continues to add more health monitoring features over time. Will we see a future where the opportunity cost of not wearing an Apple Watch is simply too great, because you are giving up on all that vital information about your own well-being?
And I don’t see people wearing a Rolex on one wrist and an Apple Watch on the other. In the end, they are going to have to make a choice.
You might be right in that there will still be people who like them enough to pay a handsome sum to collect them, but if your designer watch is just sitting in a case most of the time, is that something to be proud of?
Very true. The vast majority of Swiss autos and mechanicals depreciate the minute you walk out of the store. Currently, Rolex and Patek are the exceptions, but a watch is generally not an investment. Many end up in drawers gathering dust.
The Swiss are excellent marketers, positioning their watches as heirlooms that will be passed down to future generations. The question is, will future generations continue to be interested in outdated and inaccurate technology? Some mechanical watches are works of art and craftsmanship, they are gorgeous. IMO, we are in a time of nostalgia and we look back with fondness at items of the past. I feel that if this type of tech available in the Apple Watch was available back in the 60's or 70's it would have done even more damage to the Swiss than the quartz crisis. During that time, it was about looking forward and not looking backward.
I have a mechanical watch collection, I really like it but I don't consider it an investment. I'm also an Apple Watch fan.
Personally, I feel the health data currently coming from the Apple Watch is not very important for the vast majority of people.
The ECG feature has been tremndosly useful to a number of peopleI actually have a friend who wears his ceramic Apple Watch on one wrist and his Rolex on the other. Personally, I feel the health data currently coming from the Apple Watch is not very important for the vast majority of people. I do like that it tracks my heart rate while I'm working out but it's honestly not that useful. The timer during the workout is more useful for me.
In the future the Apple Watch may add more sensors and data that may change my mind.
One of the things about mechanical watches is that you're more likely to have a watch that nobody else in the room has on their wrist. The Apple Watch is one of those "me too" items. I see so many people on the street and in documentaries on TV wearing it that it devalues the watch in my eyes.
There are different casing materials and watch bands to help in this regard but the Apple Watch is so popular it doesn't help escape the ubiquity of it.
I expect that eventually we will see a redesign of the casing and that will help add some differentiation from the several generations of the current design that is currently out.
I do think the current design is fantastic and it would be more interesting to see Apple add to the lineup than simply eliminate the current design.
I'm more interested in the Venn diagram overlap for customers in both markets and then which one they choose. Buying an Apple watch is not nearly the same process as buying a Swiss watch.nope. I used to use a 10 grand watch. Haven’t worn it in over year since getting the series 4.
Only product? Ever heard of AirPods?
I've always had a bunch of watches, never dropped a lot of money on them, but some that the general public would consider "nice." The Apple Watch is my most expensive. And I would venture to guess that 90% of Apple Watch owners would never had dreamed of buying a +$400 watch before they purchased the Apple Watch.nope. I used to use a 10 grand watch. Haven’t worn it in over year since getting the series 4.
The whole reason I bought my Series 4.For running Apple Watch + AirPods has been magical for me.
In fairness, people throw away literally tons of non-biological trash every year that ends up in landfill. An Apple Watch screen is not likely to make much difference. I think people are reaching with this argument.
well, the AirPods is not major, its just your regular earphone but wireless. It does not take a genius to get there. I believe wireless headsets exists before the Airpods, its just the Apple version
i smiled at your analogy of the apple watch being the current day pager.
the tech of the pager limited its effective use cases.
the tech in this apple wearable is almost unlimited.
but the problem starts with the title of this macrumors article.
the premise of the article is really old and needs to change.
comparing the apple watch to swiss watches is absurd.
they are completely different products and serve completely different markets.
They have different purposes. If you're in a workout or walking around your house or walking to dogs with limited access to your phone, an Apple Watch is more appropriate.Except I’ve read about several examples in this thread where someone intentionally or unintentionally replaced their high-end mechanical watch for an Apple Watch. They aren’t completely different products since both occupy the same space on your wrist, and even though they aren’t worn solely to tell the time, they also aren’t considered non-functional jewelry.
Tag spent a ton of money developing their own smart watch. Last I checked it sold for $2K, and it was 100% intended to be these two “completely different products“ at the same time. There isn’t a 1:1 correlation—no one is saying that—but to claim they aren’t correlated at all doesn't Make sense either.
Mine is 150 years old, you both lose.
One of the things about mechanical watches is that you're more likely to have a watch that nobody else in the room has on their wrist. The Apple Watch is one of those "me too" items. I see so many people on the street and in documentaries on TV wearing it that it devalues the watch in my eyes.
There are different casing materials and watch bands to help in this regard but the Apple Watch is so popular it doesn't help escape the ubiquity of it.
I expect that eventually we will see a redesign of the casing and that will help add some differentiation from the several generations of the current design that is currently out.
I do think the current design is fantastic and it would be more interesting to see Apple add to the lineup than simply eliminate the current design.
I keep getting tempted by the Apple Watch but I don't think I could give up my Omega.
One thing is for sure: this guy wouldn't have made any money with an Apple Watch.
That is a one in a billion combination of factors that made that particular watch so valuable.
A more reasonable comparison would be an unopened Apple 1 computer kit signed by the two Steves.
Forget the signatures, the record for an Apple 1 computer is $905,000 - - it's from the same time period as when the guy bought his watch, similar price at the time, and yet sold for even more than that guy's lucky Rolex ($500,000 - $700,000).Not even close. This guy just bought a rolex and left it in a drawer. It wasn't signed or anything like that.
But unlike that Apple 1, the guy’s Rolex is still useful.Forget the signatures, the record for an Apple 1 computer is $905,000 - - it's from the same time period as when the guy bought his watch, similar price at the time, and yet sold for even more than that guy's lucky Rolex ($500,000 - $700,000).
How so? If he wears it the value drops like stone.But unlike that Apple 1, the guy’s Rolex is still useful.
How so? If he wears it the value drops like stone.