Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
3 Problems for me with these 3 products:
1 1 External Monitor limit
2 Limited to 16 GB of RAM that is shared with display processing
3 Only 2 TB3 ports

Beyond that, I can't wait for the next shoe to drop.
First gen Apple products are always slightly underwhelming.

iPhone 1 without 3G support, iPad 1 very heavy and no camera, MacBook Air 1 very expensive and low HDD capacity, Apple Watch 1 was slow and did all the processing on the iPhone and so on.

So the M2 products or whatever they will call these successors are the ones to really watch. You can be sure about Apple not giving 100% with these M1 chips, cause if they give it all there won’t be much to improve upon. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: hot-gril
The current gen is intentionally crippled, with max 16GB RAM, max 2TB storage, no 10Gbit option and only 2 TB3 ports. When they decide that the Apple Silicon based systems are ready for professional use (M2 or M3), they'll remove these limitations. In the meantime, they'll sell a lot of these systems to enthusiasts and people who just don't care what cpu is inside their computer.
It isn't intentionally crippled, it is designed for the intended use. It makes sense for Apple to start with the SoC that easiest to achieve and target the highest volume segment; they have essentially achieved parity with outgoing models in terms of memory, storage and ports. The specs are more than enough for students, general business use and majority of home use.

I'm sure Apple will follow it up over the next 18 months with 2 to 4 other M chips that are more suited for the higher end laptops, desktops and workstations, and for these use cases max memory, storage and connectivity will need to be increased.
 
3 Problems for me with these 3 products:
1 1 External Monitor limit
2 Limited to 16 GB of RAM that is shared with display processing
3 Only 2 TB3 ports

Beyond that, I can't wait for the next shoe to drop.
Exactly my issue, right now my main machine is a Mac Mini - 64GB with more than 2TB ports in use, an external GPU supporting 3x 4K monitors.... I don't need an external GPU if the internal one is good enough, but I want the support for up to 3 monitors and more memory.
 
Exactly my issue, right now my main machine is a Mac Mini - 64GB with more than 2TB ports in use, an external GPU supporting 3x 4K monitors.... I don't need an external GPU if the internal one is good enough, but I want the support for up to 3 monitors and more memory.
For people with your requirements the higher end Intel Mac mini still exists. I assume that once a higher end M SoC is launched for the higher end MBP or iMac it will become an option for the Mini as well.
 
Wonder what the mysterious “latest flash technology” refers to.
Nothing mysterious, the so called "latest" flash technology has probably been around awhile, Apple was just stingy and just used a cheaper and slower flash for the Intel Air.
 
Glad to see that Apple is moving on from intel. Looks like Apple is fixing a lot of bottlenecks.

I'm tempted to buy but I want to see how the rest of the line falls out.
 
It seems Apple leap-froged Intel and AMD. No doubt competitors will look at the M1 and try to photocopy it as much as they can.
Apple has a couple of years head start, it will be interesting to see how fast the industry moves to catch up.
We know Google is partnering with Samsung on chip design and MS with Qualcomm, so the race is on.
 
So it's twice as fast today because the cut the speed in half in the previous models? Why did they have to move to slower SSDs in the MacBook Air to begin with?
I guess there are multitude of reasons. One is price and the decrease of it and another certainly is that they didn’t upgrade the MBAs before because they already had the Apple Silicon MacBook Air already in their pipeline and wanted to give it an extra WOW !
 
Apple was always going to hold back on putting high performance components in recent Intel machines, so as to give their own CPU the bbest chance to impress.
This is why the last couple of years of releases have somewhat underwhelmed performance wise.
 
Any idea when they’ll up the capacity to 4TB, for at least the Pro?
I can imagine Apple not allowing the MacBook Air to have a 4TB SSD forcing consumers to buy the MBP if they want that size SSD. I hope I'm wrong but that seems like the type of thing Apple might do.
 
First gen Apple products are always slightly underwhelming.

iPhone 1 without 3G support, iPad 1 very heavy and no camera, MacBook Air 1 very expensive and low HDD capacity, Apple Watch 1 was slow and did all the processing on the iPhone and so on.

So the M2 products or whatever they will call these successors are the ones to really watch. You can be sure about Apple not giving 100% with these M1 chips, cause if they give it all there won’t be much to improve upon. :)
Except the M1 laptops replace *only* the low-end Intel Macs which had similar restrictions. Yes, the 2018 mini had more ports/RAM but it was also more expensive because there was no low-end. Personally, I question whether Apple initially intended to release an M1 mini or they just hurried one out the door because they already had the DTK (similar unit with A12Z) an the M1 was more performant than expected. Regardless, they still sell the higher-end Intel variations to meet your needs.

I'd also just waiting for a model that supports 32+ RAM and at least one more USB-4 port.
 
There are multiple things,

Getting Faster SSD is *easy*, doing it with low power budget is hard. Remember this is on a Laptop, you cant expect PCI-E 4.0 6GB/s speed which uses up to 10W peak. ( How ever I do expect something much faster on Desktop, and Mac Pro )

There is cost, MBA is an Apple Entry level product, cost reduction is important. As a matter of fact I am very surprised at the speed they are achieving with *256GB* Model. Normally the lower end SSD are slower due to less channel used.

It would be interesting to see if SSD are the same in Mac Mini and MacBook Pro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macguru212
Your 2015 Mac's hardware appears to be the bottleneck. The XPG SX8200 is rated for around 3400 read and 3000 write. Congratulations, you are using every bit of your Mac's disk performance.

EDIT
I just noticed this test is on a M1 model with a 256GB SSD. That is *impressive*.

256GB SSDs are usually slow and gimped, I avoid them like the plague. I’ve never seen this speed from such a tiny SSD. I fully expect the models with 1TB SSD to be around 2x faster, 4-5GB / sec.

ORIGINAL POST BELOW:

To be honest I expected faster speeds from the M1 Macs. I got about 1500r / 1300w from my 2013 MBA with that same SX8200 NVMe SSD in it. Cant check exactly as it’s now in my 2015 MBP.

I would expect the M1 MBA to pull 3+GB/sec, ie max out PCIe 3.0 which is easy with modern cheap NVME drives- Couple of thoughts:

- Maybe Apple have chosen to focus on raising random access not peak speeds. Very understandable and a good move in my opinion.

- This is v1 release. Maybe Apple are holding back on peak speeds for reliability

- or keeping something back for the 2021 models

- or keeping it for the M1 MBP as a product differentiator

- maybe PCIe 4.0 will come in the 2021 models or in MBP only

- in the port from iOS maybe the SSD code is new so max speed is not fully polished / reliable yet and will be fixed in a later upgrade.
 
Last edited:
There are multiple things,

Getting Faster SSD is *easy*, doing it with low power budget is hard. Remember this is on a Laptop, you cant expect PCI-E 4.0 6GB/s speed which uses up to 10W peak. ( How ever I do expect something much faster on Desktop, and Mac Pro )

There is cost, MBA is an Apple Entry level product, cost reduction is important. As a matter of fact I am very surprised at the speed they are achieving with *256GB* Model. Normally the lower end SSD are slower due to less channel used.

It would be interesting to see if SSD are the same in Mac Mini and MacBook Pro.
That is true, if you are on battery. If you are plugged in, you should be able to get full speed.
 
This is a nice update for the MacBook Air for sure, but it's not a new thing for Apple. Speeds are basically the same as the internal SSD in the 2018 Mini, see this thread:

 
So it's twice as fast today because the cut the speed in half in the previous models? Why did they have to move to slower SSDs in the MacBook Air to begin with?
This was my thought. Maybe they intentionally slowed down the previous sad knowing this was in the pipeline and would be able to use the phrase “twice as fast”.
 
The current gen is intentionally crippled, with max 16GB RAM, max 2TB storage, no 10Gbit option and only 2 TB3 ports. When they decide that the Apple Silicon based systems are ready for professional use (M2 or M3), they'll remove these limitations. In the meantime, they'll sell a lot of these systems to enthusiasts and people who just don't care what cpu is inside their computer.

I mean to be fair for 95% of users, the M1 provides more than enough power. So whilst they've started at the bottom and worked up, they've covered more users straight away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fourthtunz
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.