I'd counter that if a company wants to remain competitive, their goal should be to provide value to their customers. Apple's got a pretty long history of doing that... Recently - well...
As they approach the trillion dollar market cap, I'm sure we can all agree that their short term decisions are helping them make money.
I would rather say it's the price and also for some people the TouchBar. I mean, the new MBP with 500SSD is 3.300 Euros here in Germany, and with 32GB-Ram its almost 3.8k. For that kind of money, i would love to have a choice, choice to buy it without the TouchBar, cause i need my F-Buttons, for programming etc. I still use the 2015 MBP but in a year or two i will seriously need to sit down and think about maybe changing to a Windows Laptop, if they don't give me what i need, and i don't think that will happen.
If the Mac was it’s own company, today’s news would signal a significant drop in share price and Wall Street would be nervous.They don't. Mac unit revenues have been rising for years so even as they sell around the same number each year, they make more money from each one. If the Mac was it's own company, it would be in the Fortune 500 and is on it's way to being a Fortune 400 company.
I agree with this. I am puzzled as to why people continue to buy a new smartphone. It was somewhat understandable when the carrier was subsidizing it but now that that is no longer the case.Why do people have a need to buy EVERY SINGLE ITERATION OF THAT Ridiculously overpriced phone?
When VCRs came out 30+ years ago, they were thousands of dollars for the early adopters, then once everyone had one, they were $200. Original iPhone comes out, and they're $500 (unsubsidized) and after selling a billion of them, they're double the price. WTH?!?!?!
I don’t think they “don’t care” about the Mac, but I certainly feel like their entire business model has shifted to ‘mobile services’ (e.g., all-wireless mobile games and streaming media). Under this model, static devices (e.g., desktop computers like the Mac) are now periphery, while previously-peripheral devices (e.g., a ‘cell phone’) are now primary.This is no accident, this is by design. Despite what they say, Apple just doesn’t care about the Mac platform.
Difference is, you had to pay up-front years ago. Now they're partnered with CC companies that'll let you purchase at zero interest for up to 18 months. Take those customers out of the equation, and I wonder how many people are actually purchasing phones, tablets, desktops, etc outright?
I agree with this. I am puzzled as to why people continue to buy a new smartphone. It was somewhat understandable when the carrier was subsidizing it but now that that is no longer the case.
Apple needs to create their own chips and control their own release schedule. The more I think about their relationship with Intel, the less it makes sense.
Intel cannot be to blame for the lack of updates to the Mac Pro. Nor can they be blamed for the lack of updates to the Mac Mini. It's not that new technology is elusive. It's that Apple has chosen not to use it.Apple needs to create their own chips and control their own release schedule. The more I think about their relationship with Intel, the less it makes sense.
Seems mac buyers appear to be "holding the line" until brings the needed updates.
They are focussing on driving increased revenue through higher average profit per unit on the iPhone and trying to push customers towards their service offers.
The results suggest this is working.
As I said elsewhere, my view is this is a short term strategy, but you can't deny that right now, it's working.
So why would they worry about the Mac in that context?
What's the new display technology that will allow such a radical change in form factor as CRT -> LCD?
Intel cannot be to blame for the lack of updates to the Mac Pro. Nor can they be blamed for the lack of updates to the Mac Mini. It's not that new technology is elusive. It's that Apple has chosen not to use it.
Your argument makes no sense... there has been a lot of growth in the Mac ecosystem since 2009... that is way more than one average replacement cycle.
BTW, I would be happy if the Mac Pro went backward in aesthetics... I really like the cheesegrater... but I will still buy another Mac... just have not decided which one yet (I prefer headless, the market prefers headed).