Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I am more than sure that they are building up to a big event in September...

51TEPKRQ71L._SY445_.jpg

Please change your avatar.
 
Last edited:
I'd counter that if a company wants to remain competitive, their goal should be to provide value to their customers. Apple's got a pretty long history of doing that... Recently - well...

As they approach the trillion dollar market cap, I'm sure we can all agree that their short term decisions are helping them make money.

Either innovate and justify the expense or provide value. They are largely following now as an organization.
 
I would rather say it's the price and also for some people the TouchBar. I mean, the new MBP with 500SSD is 3.300 Euros here in Germany, and with 32GB-Ram its almost 3.8k. For that kind of money, i would love to have a choice, choice to buy it without the TouchBar, cause i need my F-Buttons, for programming etc. I still use the 2015 MBP but in a year or two i will seriously need to sit down and think about maybe changing to a Windows Laptop, if they don't give me what i need, and i don't think that will happen.

I was eagerly waiting for the new design in 2016. Set aside $2500-2700 because that would get you close to top of the line Mac or at least I thought so. I feel the touchbar nonsense added 400 dollars and now in 2018 processor and DDR4 RAM added a lot more. In all the price went up by $ 1100-1400 depending on the configuration. Price is a very big reason I don’t own a Mac and that stupid touchbar. It’s not that I cannot afford but just don’t feel it’s value for money.
 
Macs dont make as much money as iOS devices. Its sad that the Mac lineup has been so neglected. I hope things change, some of us still depend on a “REAL” computer to get work done. Not a watered down OS version with less features.
 
They don't. Mac unit revenues have been rising for years so even as they sell around the same number each year, they make more money from each one. If the Mac was it's own company, it would be in the Fortune 500 and is on it's way to being a Fortune 400 company.
If the Mac was it’s own company, today’s news would signal a significant drop in share price and Wall Street would be nervous.
 
Why do people have a need to buy EVERY SINGLE ITERATION OF THAT Ridiculously overpriced phone?

When VCRs came out 30+ years ago, they were thousands of dollars for the early adopters, then once everyone had one, they were $200. Original iPhone comes out, and they're $500 (unsubsidized) and after selling a billion of them, they're double the price. WTH?!?!?!
I agree with this. I am puzzled as to why people continue to buy a new smartphone. It was somewhat understandable when the carrier was subsidizing it but now that that is no longer the case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
This is no accident, this is by design. Despite what they say, Apple just doesn’t care about the Mac platform.
I don’t think they “don’t care” about the Mac, but I certainly feel like their entire business model has shifted to ‘mobile services’ (e.g., all-wireless mobile games and streaming media). Under this model, static devices (e.g., desktop computers like the Mac) are now periphery, while previously-peripheral devices (e.g., a ‘cell phone’) are now primary.
 
Apple needs to create their own chips and control their own release schedule. The more I think about their relationship with Intel, the less it makes sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Naraxus
I know a lot of people point to this as evidence Apple is abandoning the Mac, but I think the real issue is that Intel hasn’t been able to provide Apple with the chips it needs to build the computers it wants to build.

This may be wishful thinking, but maybe this finally pushes Apple over the edge into making its own chips for the Mac. Then you’d see yearly refreshes much like iPad and iPhone.
 
I bought a shiny new 15" MBP with the 2.6/16GB/1TB configuration and Applecare. $3500 with edu discount. Nice I thought, then had a really hard time adjusting to the touchbar. I'm an old guy, I can remember the physical buttons but not the ever changing bar. Okay, I can get a utility or compromise and get used to it. I also had problems with the trackpad. No palm rejection but just normal click and drag type of operations. Fiddled with the settings but still not like the 2013 15" I was trying to replace. Okay, I'll compromise and try to adjust.

Then I thought wait? $3500 and I would have make compromises to fit my needs? For $3500? I couldn't take it and returned it. I am an enthusiast, not using it for making income. I felt if I had to make adjustments in how I did things I could do that in Windows and save a bunch. I have not bought anything yet. I hope I could see a larger screen (14 or 15") maybe in an Macbook or Air config with F keys and a reasonable sized trackpad for my usage.

But I really am wanting a 15" "Non Pro" machine for $1500 or less. $2K at the most maybe.
 
Difference is, you had to pay up-front years ago. Now they're partnered with CC companies that'll let you purchase at zero interest for up to 18 months. Take those customers out of the equation, and I wonder how many people are actually purchasing phones, tablets, desktops, etc outright?

Great point. Massively overlooked IMO.
 
I agree with this. I am puzzled as to why people continue to buy a new smartphone. It was somewhat understandable when the carrier was subsidizing it but now that that is no longer the case.

Just depends on the individual. Some people see the value and have the means to afford it. I upgrade ever year because the cost is very minimal compared to how I use my iPhone. I upgrade by iPad every year as well because it's my main computer and I want to take advantage of the updates and features. The cost for me is about $200 per year.
 
Apple needs to create their own chips and control their own release schedule. The more I think about their relationship with Intel, the less it makes sense.

This has nothing to do with Intel. Most of Apple's computer (except currently the MBpro) aren't even using the latest generation chips from intel. Bringing that up in this thread discussing why Apple's computers are seeing declining numbers is a deflection to the problem that Apple's computer lineup is seeing less people who find value in it, While the competition seems to not be having as much problems.

Don't be that guy.

Apple has seen it's slowest quarter in Mac Sales since 2010... that's NOTHING to do with intel
 
The price of Pro Macs has risen considerably over the last couple of years vs similar or higher specification windows notepads. One of our all Mac clients recently bought 3 HP Zbooks for the same price as one of the MacBook Pros they get for the design team. They are trialling performance of Adobe etc in an effort to lessen the hardware costs as they have dozens of now aging MacBook Pro and iMacs in the studio which require replacing soon.
 
Apple needs to create their own chips and control their own release schedule. The more I think about their relationship with Intel, the less it makes sense.
Intel cannot be to blame for the lack of updates to the Mac Pro. Nor can they be blamed for the lack of updates to the Mac Mini. It's not that new technology is elusive. It's that Apple has chosen not to use it.
 
Seems mac buyers appear to be "holding the line" until  brings the needed updates.

I have a 2013 Mac Pro and 2011 rMBP and have been slowly weening myself over to Windows, trying to do more and more work on my (outdated, yet more graphics powerful) gaming pc and surface pro. I much prefer macOS as my primary system, but if the new Mac Pro's don't turn out to be all that, I'm going to jump ship. So far with Apple taking years to come out with a new one and using the term "modular" instead of simply "upgrade-able", I'm beginning to assume a shiny new custom Windows PC will be in my future.

Sucks because I just can't find a terminal application as good as iTerm 2 on Windows (mobaXterm is pretty good, but not as good), and I'm still pretty dependent upon Messages. Oh well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
They are focussing on driving increased revenue through higher average profit per unit on the iPhone and trying to push customers towards their service offers.

The results suggest this is working.

As I said elsewhere, my view is this is a short term strategy, but you can't deny that right now, it's working.

So why would they worry about the Mac in that context?

It's working to drive short term profit exactly.

iPhone is losing market share (while making more profit than ever) but as RIM, Nokia, Motorola, etc all discovered, it is a very fickle business, everyone wants the "cool" phones that everyone else has. If Apple slips too far, all the me too people will want a different phone.

I believe they're deliberately driving customers away from mac, expecting them to buy iPad pros and be locked tightly into the Apple service ecosystem. Timmy has said as much several times. The problem with that is they're driving all the power users away from Apple entirely. And that's cheapening the impression of Apple from the halo effect. And all the power users are the ones friends and family come to for buying advice.

And of course the iPad Pro is still just a very limited content consumption device built from the ground up to fuel demand for Apple services. And Apple seems to have no plans to change it.

So I think these short term profits are at the expense of destroying Apple's long-term viability. Just like the sculley years.

Of course Timmy will bail out at the peak while claiming to have been the greatest CEO in history. The board and major shareholders will have made fortunes off Apple. And the only people left to mourn the desiccated corpse of what once was Apple will be the former fans.
 
What's the new display technology that will allow such a radical change in form factor as CRT -> LCD?

Same as the new USB-C technology that requires a dongle so that everyone can use the old USB technology instead of just leaving the ports there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tf_dc
Very little in the Mac lineup is current, most Macs now lack feature parity with competing brands, very few people seem to like the recent MB/MBP keyboards, and Macs have become quite expensive relative to their competition. It’s not hard to see the problem.

I still very much enjoy my 2017 iMac, but I probably won’t choose a Mac for my next laptop. For my needs at least, the competition now offers more of what I need/want. And I’m a guy that has been using Macs since the 80’s, wears an Apple Watch, etc.
 
Intel cannot be to blame for the lack of updates to the Mac Pro. Nor can they be blamed for the lack of updates to the Mac Mini. It's not that new technology is elusive. It's that Apple has chosen not to use it.

Fair points, definitely not all situations, but I still feel Apple will be better suited having more control over their chips, the design, the requirements around it, and their release schedule. You see consistency and steady progression in their A series chips. This is something that could benefit their Mac line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
Your argument makes no sense... there has been a lot of growth in the Mac ecosystem since 2009... that is way more than one average replacement cycle.

BTW, I would be happy if the Mac Pro went backward in aesthetics... I really like the cheesegrater... but I will still buy another Mac... just have not decided which one yet (I prefer headless, the market prefers headed).


No sense? Well, imagine if a 2019 Camry looked just like a 2009 Camry except had a better motor. Would you be in that much of a hurry to buy one? Not saying you wouldn't buy one at all, but if you're gonna spend that kind of money, it would be nice to not be looking at the same thing.
 
Not surprising since they are outdated and expensive for as old of hardware as was on them through the quarter. Hopefully Apple is able to completely refresh the lineup soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.