The machinists are abroad because American companies focus on cheap over everything. Now it is those foreign manufacturers gaining all the manufacturing experience. Over time this increasing their capabilities and increases their quality (after all does anyone complain about the quality of Chinese made Apple computers) and increases the buying power of their local employees.
Meanwhile, in the US, manufacturing facilities close, employees are lost, manufacturing experience and knowledge fades away. Fewer people can actually afford the stuff that now has to be imported. Way to go!
Nothing you said is untrue. I don't disagree on any particular point, nor even your overall sentiment. I would like to continue your line of thought and extrapolate further.
Do/does the typical manufacturing worker really truly *want* to do the heavy work with the heavy toll it takes? What if, just maybe, they could have an opportunity to choose their own course? What if there was a circumstance where they can have a genuine strings-free option of:
A) the manufacturing job (which indeed likely is "all they know" because of their local community/family/historical experience; "my dad did this work and so must I, it's all I know"), OR...
B) a chance to specialize.. perhaps be the one to design and build the very manufacturing equipment itself.
Yes this is over-simplifying and somewhat reductive, but it brings forward something that wasn't widely available previously.
The threats of automation are upon us.. robots will take over the repetitive and easily-automated tasks. This has happened since Ford's assembly line methodology. Yes, being a heavy-equipment operator is important. Those folks build bridges and all of Manhattan. However, who builds and designs the heavy equipment in the first place? Robots can't design.
Instead of being on the "output" end, what if the worker could instead be on the "input" end?
Not everyone can be a machine designer, true. Many folks have an array of untapped potential. It just needs a chance to emerge... that's all.. a chance. It's within that brief moment, where the worker can decide between the two paths, because there is now a second path where one didn't exist (or didn't exist widely).
That's the core seed of "offshore manufacturing". If that term is unsavory, then replace it with a scenario you use every day:
* Wash your clothes by hand in a bucket every morning?, or
* toss them into a machine once a week so that robot does the work while we jabber on MR on Sunday mornings?
"But the machine was a manufacturing job in America!" True. However, it's a repetitive task that stamps out identical results in a given cycle. Back it up.. it had to first be designed and invented. Then the tooling equipment had to be made. THAT is where the real opportunity emerges.
"I yield back the remainder of my time."