Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Private businesses can require you to do what they want. Don't like wearing a mask inside a Costco? Solution is simple. Don't shop there. Your rights are not being infringed upon.
Two different categories of "requirements". Government requirements have constitutional bounds (theoretically). Private businesses are not, however, given unlimited power. They are required to serve some customers that they may not wish to (such as protected classes under Title VII). So, being a private company is not a license to discriminate at will. Yes, mask requirements may be something that drives customers to either patronize or not patronize an establishment.

The interesting thing now is the hipocrisy. Last year, when mask mandates were criticized as over-conservative by some, the answer from corporations was "We're following CDC guidelines, we're following science, if you don't want to comply, you're a radical, unscientific anti-masker!" Now, CDC says no mask required, but suddenly the corporations don't want to follow science. Now they say "Wellllll, that may be what CDC says, but we want to be extra safe" Wait a minute, it was all about the science when it suited you, now the science says you're loony and you want to disavow the science. Convenient.
 
you are required a license and insurance to operate a vehicle. it is not a right but a privilege. if you break the law, your privilege gets taken away. you also can't drive your car wherever you want. and you also can't drive cars that don't meet smog checks in certain states. there are all kinds of government restrictions in your little example.
um. do you understand the science of risk assessment? Absolutely nothing to do with any of that. The argument is whether the government can require you to live risk-free. If so, they can order you to wear a mask forever, never drive or ride in an automobile, never go on a hike in a remote area, never go outside during a thunderstorm, etc. etc. Has nothing to do with training or licensing or insurance. lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
This is absolutely wrong.

It's supposed to protect you from serious effects and hospitalization. Which it absolutely does.

But you can (and it HAS been shown in multiple instances) still pass it along to other people. (Besides, what does 95% efficacy mean to you, anyway?)
So we need to wear masks for indefinitely longer because the vaccine isn’t greater than 95% effective. Absurd.
 
I believe that the flu "disappeared" not because of masks but more probably because our new friend supersedes the flu. Many if not most C19 cases and deaths occurred in folks who were susceptible to flu. C19 is more contagious and beat out the flu.
I’m a pharmacist at a children’s hospital. We normally dispense tamiflu all the time. All winter. Every year. Tons of Tamiflu. This year? I haven’t dispensed a single course of therapy. I realize my story is just anecdotal, but still.

I read somewhere that our masks and distancing really helped the flu be an non issue this year. Would be great if that happened every year.
 
You understood the OP wrong. After being vaccinated you can still get a mild form of Covid and infect other people. If they are not already vaccinated they can die from it.
No, I understood just fine... the quote was "But you can (and it HAS been shown in multiple instances) still pass it along to other people."

No, you can't pass it along to other people. It has been shown in literally zero instances. Literally. The word literal being applied in its true form. You can't transmit the infection unless you HAVE the infection, actively. As I, you were immunocompromised and the antibodies failed and the virus evaded them. If your body has lopped off all its legs and is in the process of killing it, it isn't being transmitted. Dr Walensky at the CDC said as much, though the following day other researches said she spoke too broadly and that they're "still researching" the claim. But all evidence available says it's impossible. It's been 2 months since then... and now guidance is that vaccinated people are able to resume lives as normal......... because they can't find evidence of vaccinated individuals transmitting it...................
 
At this point, considering I have not had even a stupid cold this whole year of COVID because people were actually wearing masks and washing their hands more often, I will forever wear a mask indoors in public places. Don’t know about you, but I like not being sick. I’m fine to be the weird person with the N95 at the supermarket or on an airplane and not get sick. Survival of the fittest has become survival of the smartest. Whatever…
In Asian countries like South Korea and Japan it is not that of an uncommon practice... either for when feeling under the weather, when the air pollution is above perfect levels, etc.
Here in Canada I live close by a convenience store ran by an Asian family (at least over here that’s an actual stereotype as it’s incredibly common) and the cashiers (random member) more often than not use gloves and masks, years before COVID. It could also have been germaphobic behavior but it isn’t, when I see them outside for a smoke or just some random day they just don’t use them (again pre covid).

Maybe these couple of years ends up normalizing this. Myself I don’t find weird the masks anymore... the very first few weeks though, heck yes, it felt so foreign.

+1 on not having gotten sick: since I try to work from home 99.99% of the time, only go out for a daily run far from people and use masks otherwise I haven’t gotten not even a runny nose since this all started. Would rather keep it that way too if possible.
 
If you’re looking for problems, anyone making any conclusions or proclamations about the field of experimental microbiology is fundamentally stupid.

This includes everyone worried about adverse reactions to treatment, AND everyone worried about getting COVID-19.

The viral ID methods, and even the research equipment are “experimental”. None of this is hard science, there’s a huge margin of error in any viral ID.

The mask people listened to the advice of epidemiologists about a field they aren’t even involved in, and that’s highly contested and theoretical on its own. That’s a 100% clown move. They heard thunder and ran for a priest, instead of a meteorologist.
Well, remember that with global warming, we started to revere the meteorologist as nearly a deity unto his or her own greatness and all-knowingness. This is why people believe global warming claims from a group that can't even tell me if it's going to rain this afternoon.
The sociology studies of all this should be pretty interesting, many of the political left who have doggedly ridiculed the religious right, behaved the exact same way, turning to irrational fear and superstition at the mere mention of the unknown. The only difference is with the right, they wear their magic panties underneath the clothing.
omg, that's hilarious and I don't know why!
If anyone ever made a derisive comment to me about wearing a mask there would be a confrontation. Just because I’m willing to wear a mask doesn’t make me a pacifist.
No it doesn't, and you would be welcome at my house, as long as you unmasked long enough for initial identification for all the security cameras. Don't worry, my cameras are fast and you won't be crowded by any covid-positive people when you temporarily unmask. :)📸
He was right - learn the science. A vaccine is designed to prevent you from catching the disease caused by the virus. The vaccine arms your body with the antibodies in advance so when that one little virus strand shows up in your body and tries to attach its receptor to your cells it finds itself muzzled with an antibody that fits like a glove over the receptor and makes it incapable of infecting your cells. Even if the virus gets a few cells and reproduces in tiny quantities dodging the antibodies at first your body will have antibodies in your blood stream to prevent further infection or virus reproduction leaving the virus to die in your blood and get filtered by your kidneys.

hence you don’t get the disease and are never infectious. Folks with weaker immune systems may find that their body stops producing the antibodies and when the virus shows up those people’s immune system then kick in and “remember” which antibody to create and though they do get sick it is never that bad since their body’s reaction is much faster than somebody who was never exposed. BUT this is not how vaccine’s are made to work. They are not made to make it so you are less sick, but a byproduct of when somebody’s immune system is more lax is that vaccine has already trained the immune system on what to do. This is when they record a “failure” of the vaccine to work (efficacy rate measures how often it succeeds)

So in summary, vaccines work by preventing infection. When vaccines are not effective they still provide the backup/fallback of making it so you don’t get very sick from the virus.

Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are both over 90% effective. So 9 out of 10 vaccinated with those will NEVER get infected. Never catch COVID-19 disease from the virus. The 1 out of 10 who can still get sick if exposed to will have a mild case of COVID-19. If enough people get vaccinated then we get herd immunity. And the virus finds it has to do the equivalent of winning the lottery to spread within a population with herd immunity.
Thank you BC2009!

Ladies and Gentlemen:

THIS is what I learned in high school in the 1970s, later confirmed in my basic college biology required coursework in the early 1980s. I ended up going into IT, but I still paid attention in biology! Seriously, were some of you asleep or texting during school, and now just making things up because you don't really know how biology works? Or weren't you taught these things in your government school in the first place? Asking for a friend...
Then you are willing to present an electronic vaccination "passport" as proof when asked at a store/facility?
Maybe, if I don't have to give my name. After all, an ApplePay purchase doesn't give my name or credit card # to that same retailer, but it can STILL authorize payment. So let's do something like THAT, alright?
Thanks for the “dramatic” language. The simple truth it is a private company and private property. Don’t like the rules, don’t enter. But also all the tards and no vaxers will just come in without a mask anyway spreading pandemic Willy nilly. Now if they just exposed themselves and were the only ones to die and didn’t use insurance benefits and hospital space -who cares, but that is not the case, sadly

so if anyone chooses to still wear a mask and any company chooses to continue to provide safety. Good for them. It’s called freedom.
You kind of had me in your first sentence, but your enflaming use of "tards" and "no vaxers" lost me all over again.

"Can't we all just get along?" - Rodney King
no it's not and stop spreading misinformation.
He's re-iterating the high school biology you skipped or were sleeping through.

This will likely cause some kerfuffles/scuffles in stores.
Maybe it's time we had some kerfuffles. People should note, however; that if they're gonna dance the kerfuffle dance with an unwilling partner, then they need to be mentally, emotionally, and spiritually prepared to dance to the unwilling partner's music.

Put another way: "No means no"
Which is why surgeons wear masks when the OR and have done so for generations. Would you really want one to go without masks when they take you into the OR.

Personally, I'm fighting the 5th cancer and will be wearing masks when ever I go to a store, It's not rocket science. Patients going to Chemo all wear a mask, as do the medical professional personnel working in the chemo rooms.
In your case, you should continue to do what your doctors tell you to do. None of this discussion is meant to imply or state that you should disobey the advice of your medical experts.
There is also the problem with the annual flu issues. Last year has been very mild because people were wearing masks, but 61000 died in '17 - '18, and over 800,000 were hospitalized. Masks are going to be attractive to older folks as well as all people who are fragile - and their families.
I don't think anybody can say with certainty that lower flu rates were due to mask-wearing, yet you've made that assumption.

Maybe the fact that I spent all last summer working only in my home office, garden, and kitchen was more causal than any mask-wearing I might have done in my, what, bi-weekly visits to the pharmacy, grocery store, or ... hmmm, grocery store?
I went to Japan a few years ago for work. I was impressed that at the airport they take your temperature and give you a free mask right as soon as you get off the plane (if you're sick).

Imo that's doing something right. Here, we have our sick leave rolled up in PTO so no one takes sick leave - and gets the whole office sick over and over.
Not every place. My company offers up to 40 hours of sick leave. It gets re-stocked to 40 hours every January 1st. After that, a person could elect to burn vacation time or apply for medical leave.
The point of getting a vaccine is to protect yourself and eventually protect others once herd immunity is achieved. The point of wearing a mask is to protect others until herd immunity is achieved.
But I don't think it does protect others. I've never SEEN so much face-and-mask-touching going on since the masks!

A million years from now, a future civilization will be contemplating the demise of our civilization, and they'll learn that we poisoned ourselves with our own masks, not unlike some ancient civilizations who made their utensils and drinking vessels from lead or other heavy metals. Yum yum!
I have my CDC card. Just curious, when should we stop wearing masks? or do you want everyone to live in fear the rest of their lives and wear masks and hazmat suits?
Those are not the only two options. But I share your frustration!
They did, they specifically stated those who were fully vaccinated. They did not state “liars” in any guideline whatsoever
This is a good point to note.
Unfortunately you are wrong and I really hope no one gets sick or worse because of your carelessness.
Again, he was giving you that high school biology lecture that you zoned out on because you were texting your friends. Or sleeping.
The amount of correct information one has regarding COVID seems to be inversely proportional to the amount of posts they make about COVID.
People: Get the vaccine. Keep wearing masks as requested. It's not hard. We're almost through, thankfully because as dumb as we are we are the richest nation. Look, New Zealand gave you Lord Of The Rings the movies. You like New Zealand. Be like New Zealand.
LOL, point taken!

But our patience will wear thin. Remember, I can walk out of an office in NYC and get a sausage with onions and peppers RIGHT THERE ON THE STREET within 5 minutes or less.

Oh wait, that was before we killed New York City.
how about not dying?
Again, it's not that kind of choice.
you should stop wearing masks when about 75% of your population is vaccinated.

the best thing you can do to have things go back to normal is to try to convince anyone you know that doesn’t want to get vaccinated for whatever reason to do so
Now THIS I can agree with.
No it does not educate yourself. The vaccine will not protect you from getting the virus.
Wow, is the whole world anti-high school biology?
Perhaps people who can’t be bothered to wear a mask or get a vaccine should opt to stay home?
Thank you for conflating the language. I'm anti-mask, but that's not the same as "can't be bothered to wear a mask". I wear a mask if legally required to do so. I will also wear a mask if requested by a business, at least I will for several more weeks and maybe even a month or two. But my patience has a limit, and I'm all out of patience for government wonks and people named Dr. Fauci.

There are millions like me, who express disagreement, but are constantly being gaslit to mean that we "can't be bothered to wear a mask". This is unfair and it feels like you don't appreciate the efforts that I/we already HAVE gone to in order to accommodate unreasonable diktats.

Misuse of the language is insulting and quite frankly, it's tearing us apart, so please stop it!
Private businesses can require you to do what they want. Don't like wearing a mask inside a Costco? Solution is simple. Don't shop there. Your rights are not being infringed upon.
You're right about all this, of course. But why does it feel that you're beating people over the head with it?
Yeah, preach brother! Why does the government force me to wear pants or underwear when I go outside my house? It’s ridiculous! I should be able to go anywhere in America I want to without any pants on, whether that’s a crowded grocery store, an elementary school, or even the library! It’s a free country and this is oppression!!!
I declare this week to be "No Pants for People Named "uller6" week"! You should definitely pick your biggest errand day and do ALL of your errands sans pants. Make up a nice name tag too, because if everybody knows your name, then they won't arrest you for breaking the law. Probably.

😉

I’m a pharmacist at a children’s hospital. We normally dispense tamiflu all the time. All winter. Every year. Tons of Tamiflu. This year? I haven’t dispensed a single course of therapy. I realize my story is just anecdotal, but still.

I read somewhere that our masks and distancing really helped the flu be an non issue this year. Would be great if that happened every year.
I think it was the distancing. No evidence that the masks have any effect if everybody's in their own room attending work or school on zoom anyway, right?
 
I hope everyone commenting and reading this have been vaccinated; if not what are you waiting for?
Here waiting for Canada and its helicopter-parent-like government... for all the flak people here say and throw to the US, well goddamn, don’t think we are doing any better. These couple of years it was the sport of opinionated people to mock the US handling of COVID, well, show them wrong then, when it’s time to take action and show how it can be done better then it doesn’t happen.

Got an appointment to take it in about two weeks (which was given to me weeks ago), hope it goes through. The follow up shot can be many weeks (or even over a month and a half) later after the first one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: windowsblowsass
Removing the requirement for masks now doesn’t mean they weren’t valuable in the past and doesn’t mean they won’t be needed again in the future. For everyone saying masks were theater and didn’t work, you‘re substituting politics for science.

I've got no problem with Apple requiring masks. They have no way to determine who is vaccinated and who isn't and don't want to have people getting sick in their stores, good for them.

As for the rest of the country, I’ve got mixed feelings at this point. I tend to believe that we should do all we can to beat this virus into the ground while we have the opportunity but, at least in the US, we seem to have more vaccine supply than demand and there’s only so much I’m willing to do to protect people against their own ignorance.


I start all of my thinking about mask wearing from the simple premise that it's the mildest of inconveniences to endure for the sake of public safety. I'm vaccinated and I wasn't in a risk group to begin with, so people can put away their "fear" rhetoric. This is about public safety for me, not personal safety. I'd have preferred to see us prioritize opening activities first and reducing mask wearing later.

I wish I knew more about the deliberations at CDC before rolling out the new guidelines, but they seem to be based on evidence that vaccinated people are both less likely to develop life threatening symptoms and less likely to asymptomatically spread the disease.

I see no evidence that they thought about how to verify who is vaccinated and not. To a certain extent, that's not really their job. They're not an enforcement agency. It's up to the states, local jurisdictions and, in this case, private businesses to make that decision. Still, they must have known that this would apply pressure on enforcement agencies to roll back masking. I find it rather strange how this was released with immediate effect without any local agencies being aware it was coming.


Once we knew we had a working vaccine, I was in favor of locking down hard while we got it distributed because it seemed any new infection and death from that point forward was essentially preventable. I felt that policy should be held until we got the logistics resolved and we got the vaccine to everyone who wanted it.

Now it seems we're getting close to where everyone who is eligible and wants it has it or can get it nearly on demand.


So the question for me is about who's still not eligible. Young kids are one category, and that's a concern for me. Infants are particularly vulnerable, it sounds. It seems we're still learning how the virus affects children (and anyone screaming "it's like a mild flu" needs to do some digging because while it seems younger people are less likely to get the grown-up symptoms they do seem to be susceptible to longer term ailments).

I'm pretty sure that most vulnerable populations are eligible, the one exception I'd heard is that it's not clear how well the vaccine works in immunocompromised patients.

I would have liked to see us do more to protect those demographics by ensuring younger children are eligible and maybe getting the overall vaccination numbers a bit higher before we just flung the doors open to the disease again.

I imagine what we might find in the US from this point forward is that the overall case numbers continue to decline, but the demographic makeup of those numbers shifts such that it declines more quickly for the traditionally vulnerable but decreases more slowly among young people and the immunocompromised.
 
I'm sure the CDC took liars into account when coming up with their guidance. They're not idiots and realize some people will lie.
I'm not sure they did or should. The CDC is a medical organization, not an enforcement organization. What they've said, effectively, is that vaccinated people don't need to wear masks which seems to be true based on the current science.

They've also said "Prevention measures are still recommended for unvaccinated people.".

They haven't given any recommendation on how to enforce compliance by the non-vaccinated, and haven't provided any evidence that their recommendations are safe in mixed populations among the vaccinated and lying-non-vaccincated.

A reasonable response to this recommendation by states would have been, "The CDC has just confirmed that vaccinated individuals are safe without masks, so once we have sufficient vaccination rates in our state we will drop our mask mandate."

Dropping the mask mandate before the vaccinated population is sufficiently high, and without a reliable means to distinguish vaccinated from non-vaccinated, appears to be a political decision, not a scientific one.
 
I'm not sure they did or should. The CDC is a medical organization, not an enforcement organization. What they've said, effectively, is that vaccinated people don't need to wear masks which seems to be true based on the current science.

They've also said "Prevention measures are still recommended for unvaccinated people.".

They haven't given any recommendation on how to enforce compliance by the non-vaccinated, and haven't provided any evidence that their recommendations are safe in mixed populations among the vaccinated and lying-non-vaccincated.

A reasonable response to this recommendation by states would have been, "The CDC has just confirmed that vaccinated individuals are safe without masks, so once we have sufficient vaccination rates in our state we will drop our mask mandate."

Dropping the mask mandate before the vaccinated population is sufficiently high, and without a reliable means to distinguish vaccinated from non-vaccinated, appears to be a political decision, not a scientific one.

I don’t even know if it’s true. In Australia we don’t have community transmission as a general rule but the security guards on quarantine hotels keep getting sick despite being vaccinated. Sure they’re not getting very sick but it doesn’t appear to be fool proof.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
I don’t even know if it’s true. In Australia we don’t have community transmission as a general rule but the security guards on quarantine hotels keep getting sick despite being vaccinated. Sure they’re not getting very sick but it doesn’t appear to be fool proof.
The mask is only mildly beneficial when worn by the guard. The mask is more important to be worn by someone infected (symptomatic or not).
 
The mask is only mildly beneficial when worn by the guard. The mask is more important to be worn by someone infected (symptomatic or not).

Yes of course but vaccinated guards are catching it and then passing it on to people outside of quarantine so the idea masks aren’t needed with vaccinations seems to have a few holes in it.
 
Yes of course but vaccinated guards are catching it and then passing it on to people outside of quarantine so the idea masks aren’t needed with vaccinations seems to have a few holes in it.
Ah, sorry, I get your point.

The US CDC guidelines do have these clauses:

"Fully vaccinated people should also continue to wear a well-fitted mask in correctional facilities and homeless shelters."​

and

"Exceptions where testing (but not quarantine) is still recommended following an exposure to someone with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 include:​
- Fully vaccinated residents and employees of correctional and detention facilities and homeless shelters."​

Which I think recognizes situations similar to your quarantine hotels.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
How do you know if the customer that enters your store is vaccinated or not? CDC recommendation doesn't address this, so this is why Apple is still requiring masks for now, which makes sense for the safety of those who are still not vaccinated.
I hear you… but do you hear yourself? I’m not being snarky, I’m serious.

Anti-Maskers were ridiculed for not following CDC guidelines. And I feel there was certainly justification to ridicule them. Just wear a mask. However, now CDC guidelines lay out new guidelines which allows vaccinated people to go maskless. Not following that guideline is just as extreme as the anti maskers were before. If folks want to tout guidlines, follow them for both directions.

You point out a difficulty in identifying vaccinated people - okay. But we don’t punish everyone because some people might* break the rules. Sorry. It just doesn’t work like that. Folks in the US (and I know that is an extreme privilege) have had access to the vaccine for up to 6 months now. Some less, depending on age, I know, but never the less. If you are concerned, get vaccinated. You shouldn’t be worried about getting it from the hypothetical person who didn’t get a vaccine and chose not to wear a mask.

all this said, Apple is a private company and can ask you to wear flip flops for all I care…
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.