Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Feels like Apple couldn't get together an improved display in time, so just got one out of the iMac parts bin, and put some new sheet metal on it.
 
Feels like Apple couldn't get together an improved display in time, so just got one out of the iMac parts bin, and put some new sheet metal on it.
I think it’s a bit more complicated than that. And when you say ‘in time’, why would they need to release a product specifically to what competitor in what time frame?
 
So $2000 for. Monitor that you could go out and pay $499 for from LG that does everything you want it to from Apple for $2000? Do you like getting ripped off? Ohhhhh and it comes with HDR
You wanna link me to where you found a $499 27”, 5K, mini-LED monitor from LG? Bonus points if it has speakers / camera / microphone built-in and doesn’t look like ****.
 
Well, I mean it’s not 5K, so for anyone that has 5K as a required spec, it wouldn’t cut it.
Which is sort of my point for the people complaining about the price of the Studio Display. Most monitors in this ~$1500 price range are still just 4K, even if they’re 27” or 32”, because PC OEMs don’t take the hard road of making the things that Apple makes. Users here need to decide if they want Apple to make displays or not. Apple isn’t making a $400 display, so if a $400 display is the benchmark around here there are a whole bunch of forum posters who are going to need to get over themselves. Won’t happen, but it needs to.
 
Eh? Which competition? Please send me some links of competing 5K 27“ displays with speakers and a web camera.

I think that it's a bit fallacious to systematically ask for exactly the same specs for what constitutes "competition".
Otherwise I'd be able to present a trapezoidal B&W floor standing display as something without peers... even though the specs may not suit a lot of use cases.

The reality is that users will make compromises between varying specs and show more or less elasticity for each sort of specifications depending on their application.

I'm personally rather drawn into displays for visual applications (photo, video, graphical applications), and for what I do 4K vs. 5K is an acceptable compromise if it nets me benefits Apple's Studio Display can't provide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chancha
Apple conned everyone the display is old tech it’s mega over priced for what it is, get the Mateview it’s so cheap and better

Unfortunately this has been the trend for a while now at Apple. Even the XDR display is way overpriced for what you actually get.
 
The Apple Studio Display's main draw is that it features a collection of USPs that you won't find anywhere else. If you happen to be attracted by all these USPs at once it might be a very interesting purchase. My guess here is that these people aren't that numerous.

Unfortunately the display itself other than its resolution is quite uninteresting. You won't find something "better" elsewhere in every way, but you'll find plenty of alternatives that may be more or less better suited to the task you'll use it for. I would actually argue that for some of the "creatives" Apple seemed to market the Studio combo to, the Studio Display isn't a great buy in 2022.

All of the following provide better specs in one or multiple ways over the Studio Display (and worse in others), for a similar-ish or cheaper price (well TBD for one of them, but given what the price the TVs using the same panel will be at...) :
(that one should quell the idea that the XDR's backlighting is anything to write home about in 2022, although I'm quite skeptical about the algorithm)

Displays are about to experience a transition just as significant as what happened with higher PPI displays, and I'm personally a little bit disappointed to see that Apple wasn't able to be as agressive in that regard with their dedicated display as with their mobile devices. It seems that LG's new IPS black technology is fairly inexpensive to implement, at the very least I'd have liked to see that.

More worrisome to me is that at this price I'd expect low tolerances and great screen uniformity from a standard IPS display, and yet I'm fairly certain that QC won't be any better than the LG's or the iMac's : https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/202...e-monitor-where-5k-doesnt-describe-the-price/

Not being a gamer, super fast refresh rates don't interest me at all. Being a photographer and content creator, resolution and color accuracy greatly interests me.

The displays you mentioned do not meet my needs.

How about listing some displays that are better suited for my and many others' needs with better resolution and color accuracy, at a price lower or the same as Apple's?
 
I think it’s a bit more complicated than that. And when you say ‘in time’, why would they need to release a product specifically to what competitor in what time frame?
In that the Studio Mac is supposedly intended to replace the higher end iMacs (and up), Apple needed a display to go with the Studio Mac.
Unless they give up and tell us just to go buy a third party display (or the $6000 XDR).

Feels like they have basically recycled the panel from the 27" iMac, with no meaningful display improvements.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NightOne
Unfortunately this has been the trend for a while now at Apple. Even the XDR display is way overpriced for what you actually get.
So if the price point doesn’t meet the standards of what you’re looking for, then why don’t you shop a cheaper display then? Clearly this price point isn’t intended for you, and/or it’s above a price range that you possibly can’t afford.
 
Surely you must know that plugs can fail for a variety of reasons. The plug should be user replaceable for that reason alone.
Gee, I would just cut the power cord where it has failed and solder in the new plug or wire and away we go. I have a degree in electronic engineering, but my kids can replace a wired power cord. However, I have never had a power plug/cord on any computer I have ever owned fail, never, ever. Unless it is my MacBook Pro, I don't plug or unplug my computer, monitors, peripherals unless I am replacing them.

I have lived in the same house for 40 years, my office at home has been in the same room, same location in the room, same custom desk, for 39 of the 40 years, so when I say I have not unplugged my displays, I have taken the display out of the box, plugged it into my UPS and that's it. My current setup is a 2012 MacPro which is going to be replaced next week with a Mac Studio Ultra, my displays are a 27" LCD and a 30" Cinema display the 30" is going to be retired and replaced with a Studio 27" I just replaced by 2012 MacPro 15" with a MacBook Pro M1 Max. All my computers are purchased maxed out so I don't need to replace them for at least 5 years. I was lucky and got 10 years out of my last computer purchases. I will admit that I have an unusually stable environment. But I just don't see that have a fixed power cord is a deal breaker for most people with any decktop system they are after all designed not to be portable.
 
Not being a gamer, super fast refresh rates don't interest me at all.

Me neither.

Being a photographer and content creator, resolution and color accuracy greatly interests me.

The displays you mentioned do not meet my needs.

How about coming up with some displays that are better suited for my and many others' needs with better resolution and color accuracy, at a price lower or the same as Apple's?

Some of the displays mentioned in the list above have better colour coverage than Apple's, and some will have better QC/uniformity.

I work in that field as well and the Studio Display doesn't provide me with anything that would improve my capacity to produce something (and not anything that I couldn't get my hands on years ago).
 
What if you want to route the cable through a hole in a desk as part of cabling management?

Actually, I've just realised this might not be an issue unless you're in the UK where our plugs are pretty wide and unfriendly for doing just that.

But also, what if you want a longer cable? Or your cable gets damaged?
See my other reply about a damage cable, but cables generally don't just fail on their own. Most of the time they fail because some yahoo is yanking on the wire to remove the plug from the socket. If you grasp the plug to remove it from the socket, generally that keeps the power cable from getting damage. Now if you get a real powerful power surge, a direct hit by lightening, it would be possible that the plug would get welded to the power outlet, but if that happens you are going to have more problems then a damaged power cable.
 
Gee, I would just cut the power cord where it has failed and solder in the new plug or wire and away we go. I have a degree in electronic engineering, but my kids can replace a wired power cord. However, I have never had a power plug/cord on any computer I have ever owned fail, never, ever. Unless it is my MacBook Pro, I don't plug or unplug my computer, monitors, peripherals unless I am replacing them.

I have lived in the same house for 40 years, my office at home has been in the same room, same location in the room, same custom desk, for 39 of the 40 years, so when I say I have not unplugged my displays, I have taken the display out of the box, plugged it into my UPS and that's it. My current setup is a 2012 MacPro which is going to be replaced next week with a Mac Studio Ultra, my displays are a 27" LCD and a 30" Cinema display the 30" is going to be retired and replaced with a Studio 27" I just replaced by 2012 MacPro 15" with a MacBook Pro M1 Max. All my computers are purchased maxed out so I don't need to replace them for at least 5 years. I was lucky and got 10 years out of my last computer purchases. I will admit that I have an unusually stable environment. But I just don't see that have a fixed power cord is a deal breaker for most people with any decktop system they are after all designed not to be portable.
Cool. Good thing everyone has your exact experiences!!!

Seriously though, it's ok to admit it is a mistake to not have a removable power cord.
 
This is only really a problem for folks not looking to buy it, though, so it makes sense that Apple focuses only on those that actually might buy it.

Wut? How? There are plenty of folks who may want a stand and then want to switch to VESA mount down the line, or vice versa…
 
  • Like
Reactions: NightOne
Sure I’ll get slated here but the only reason people are complaining is because this is expensive. Then people get triggered about all their stuff being expensive.

When time has a monetary assignment to it, the amount of time their stuff saves offsets the cost massively. The value for money function of it is higher than the other alternatives by an order of magnitude.

If you’re not making money with it then you’re probably not aware of this relationship or it doesn’t factor into your spending decisions. Which is fine. You probably don’t need it. You just want it and it’s painful if you reach out for it.

Just remember the influencers like iJustine are about making money too.

Also worth noting that the depreciation and asset value of a purchase should be factored in. Apple is excellent there.

The problem with the price comes in when they tell me this is the only product between a low level 24" iMac and and upcoming Mac Pro as they discontinue our 27" iMacs.

Studio not for us? Fine. Tell what is? 24" iMac = No , Mac Mini = No, Studio = No, and Mac Pro = No

So if you want us to buy more than we need then come in at a better price point.

If the M1 Max studio came in at $1299 and the display at $999 (and maybe even $1299) then 27" iMac users who want to upgrade would be ordering like crazy. That extra $1000-$1300 though is what drives them off. Especially true when the out of the box device would be upgraded by most 27" iMac users - storage and memory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macsteve27
I thought you can get these changed at an Apple Store?

Presumably the camera is the exact same one as in other devices, so image quality must be down to software which will get fixed?

MR has highlighted two reviews which praise the speakers. The Six Colors one is disappointed by the speakers. Reviews are subjective, we all have to remember that.

There's lots of options out there at different price points with different features, this is just another one of those options which has pros & cons when compared with others.
Nope, it’s locked in at purchase on these new displays according to Apple’s site.

You pretty much have to pick the VESA option if you ever want any flexibility later
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
I can remember defending the "Apple tax" back when the products they released had the quality to back up the sometimes outrageously overpriced hardware. I think those days have passed, I think Apple is just getting more and more greedy with the Mac.
This has been happening over the last 5-6 years. Culminating in the outrageous pricing we see today across all the products.

Before they were genuinely great products worth paying that bit extra for.

Recently many of the products don’t have the features you’d expect for that price.

The XDR display is not even distinguishable from an iMac 5K display. I compared them side by side in the store and I could not see where that £4600 price tag came from.
 
Jobs wanted the original Mac to be $1995 but sugar water Sculley insisted it be $2495 and the board sided with Sculley

We know the rest of the history from there
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.