Really? Around here construction costs for a cheaply built home are closer to $250/foot. I would think that in the Bay Area costs are easily as much or more.
I suppose if you build a house with no basement and no furnace, costs are lower, like in Florida. But $170/foot? Really? Wow.
I truly understand how much cash on hand Apple deals with but HOW do you get two BILLION dollars over budget?![]()
I'm confused why $2 billion is a big deal to Apple when they are trying to create the best campus possible. They have more money on hand than the US government and would make that money back relatively quick. Oh well, it's their money, do as they please.
I'd like to see Apple give incentives to workers who bike. It'd cut down on traffic, parking lots and long term maintenance costs. The weather is temperate for most of the year.
That sounds more like delaying costs than cutting costs.
I truly understand how much cash on hand Apple deals with but HOW do you get two BILLION dollars over budget?![]()
You can easily build a high-level, nicely trimmed 3500 sqft house in Ohio (and most of the midwest) for $450,000 (~$128/sqft). That includes full basement, hardwood floors, etc.
Urban planner here. Sidewalks need to be wider.
If they built in Nevada or Texas they would save $2 billion easy. I'm sure they got tax breaks, but nothing near what other states would give. There's states that would actually 'pay' Apple to build that monstrosity.
I guess it's a good thing none of the geniuses in this thread will ever have to worry about working for Apple, then, since this building is such an apparent disaster. Not that anyone here knows anything about architecture or running billion dollar corporations.
Urban planner here. Sidewalks need to be wider.
I truly understand how much cash on hand Apple deals with but HOW do you get two BILLION dollars over budget?![]()
Around here, $450k buys you a crappy older ranch house, or a 2 bedroom condo.
I'm confused why $2 billion is a big deal to Apple when they are trying to create the best campus possible. They have more money on hand than the US government and would make that money back relatively quick. Oh well, it's their money, do as they please.
Even more confusing to me is why Apple has no problem pouring money into a building while letting pro apps and computers grow obsolete. How much would it cost to hire a few dozen more programmers and engineers to develop new versions of Aperture and the Mac Pro?
I used to think of Apple as a company that sunk their profits back into R&D as an investment in the company's future. Maybe that was just Jobs's RDF?
And you probably think we in the middle of the country are the idiots.
And you probably think we in the middle of the country are the idiots.