Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I thought you could only successfully sue a company when the trademark is infringed upon in the same market as the original trademark?

“According to Phone Radar (via The Verge), KON believes Apple's new logo is a violation of Chinese copyright law”

Oh the irony of Chinese copyright law.

That's generally the rule under US trademark law. Not idea if that's how Chinese law analyzes it though.
If I recall correctly there is a company in China that was ruled to be allowed to use the "iPhone" name as long as it's not associated with Apple. Seems like this can fall under something similar where Apple could use the logo/image as long as it's not associated with the clothing retailer.
 
A Chinese company is suddenly concerned about intellectual property protection. Ironic.

China is the last place that should talk about fair business practices... the fact you need to hand over your IPO for market access is just unfathomable. It destroys the very thing that stimulates people to share ideas and make companies such as Apple.

So, because the government is corrupt and the copy right laws in the country show little to no respect to foreign companies the businesses in that country should just go without any protection at all? Don't be a hypocrite... No, I don't think damages should be payed, but I can see why the company would want the logo changed. Like someone else said: I see that hat, I think "Apple Store". Cases like that are exactly why trademark protection exists...
 
I thought you could only successfully sue a company when the trademark is infringed upon in the same market as the original trademark?
I believe China's copyright laws are a little different and they don't make this distinction, which would mean Apple would clearly be in violation here, as while there are some differences, the logos are indeed very similar.

Additionally, even if it did have to be in the same market, I could see a case being made that if the clothing company wanted to create an App and put it in the app store it could cause confusion for consumers. And I think that would be a very legitimate case to be made.
 
Apple has been using the logo way longer than that. Check out this screenshot of MacOS 10.0, from 2001 (notice the "Applications" icon):

desktop.jpg


The recent change is a natural evolution of that design. There's no way they should win.

That isn't even looking like theirs.
 
Apple has been using the logo way longer than that. Check out this screenshot of MacOS 10.0, from 2001 (notice the "Applications" icon):

desktop.jpg


For more information: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_OS_X_10.0

The Applications icon from OSX 10.0 is very different to the icon Apple use now for the AppStore icon - in OSX 10.0 it is clearly a paintbrush and a pencil resting on a ruler. Whereas the new AppStore icon is 3 interconnected lines - no pencil or paintbrush.

The recently updated AppStore icon has lot more in common with the Kon logo, in my opinion...
 
I believe China's copyright laws are a little different and they don't make this distinction, which would mean Apple would clearly be in violation here, as while there are some differences, the logos are indeed very similar.

Additionally, even if it did have to be in the same market, I could see a case being made that if the clothing company wanted to create an App and put it in the app store it could cause confusion for consumers. And I think that would be a very legitimate case to be made.
https://www.theverge.com/2016/5/3/1...an-use-the-name-iphone-for-non-apple-products
 
LMAO

I lived in China off and on for about 15 years.
The best case of Chinese intellectual property rip off I saw was the car company Land Wind. Land Rover / Jaguar took them to court in Beijing and were basically laughed out of court. I wouldn't be surprised if Apple ends up apologizing for hurting the companies feelings lol
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.