Sounds like Apple needs to up their endpoint security game. I was working in less sensitive environments and people couldn’t -simply connect external harddisks or USB sticks.
Nah, it’s more that it would be almost impossible for the firm to claim that their design is a clean room design now because of the exfiltrated data. It’s a way of letting them stay in business, acknowledging that the design couldn’t really be clean room anymore, and still getting reimbursed by the firm’s profits from the stolen data.did anyone else think this was odd:
Damages and/or judicial relief.What do you think they are using the result of civil trial for ?
Qualcomm engineers are probably interns more than anything given the current state of their chips.while Apple builds a campus in San Diego CA whose sole purpose is to poach Qualcomm engineers
It sounds like Apple wants a reasonable royalty rate as compensation.Hope Rivos have deep pockets because if proven the compensation will be eyewatering.
That's very naive.But I think apple really out to take a look at themselves and their work environments when they continue to have an issue of high-level employees jumping ship and sabotaging the company. Happy employees that want for nothing don’t do this sort of thing.
Regardless this will effectively shut down the company. With the former engineers being held liable the company has lost any IP so backers will be hard to find as they’ll have to start from scratch, if they can, and whatever money they had will be zapped in legal fees win or lose.Those employees if proven are going to go to jail for a long time. Apple will make sure they end up in a Russian prison at this rate
Also Apple is being reasonable , they are not asking the company to be shut down , they are asking for royalties for using its tech
Sounds like Apple needs to up their endpoint security game. I was working in less sensitive environments and people couldn’t -simply connect external harddisks or USB sticks.
Sounds to be less about the employees, per se, and more about the IP they allegedly took with them. Two different issues.Hypocritical when, for example, Srouji is from Intel. Apple is just abusing its size to stunt competition and it's not even direct competition since it's RISC-V architecture vs ARM. FTC should investigate and put that demon Cook in prison.
nonsense, for one, a lot of the former Intel modem engineers were based in San Diego when Apple acquired them, and secondly, the "center" of the RF design world is in San Diego, so yes, a lot of different companies are based there and talent movement is a normal event ...while Apple builds a campus in San Diego CA whose sole purpose is to poach Qualcomm engineers
so it's ok to take trade secrets with you when you change companies? Think again ...Hypocritical when, for example, Srouji is from Intel. Apple is just abusing its size to stunt competition and it's not even direct competition since it's RISC-V architecture vs ARM. FTC should investigate and put that demon Cook in prison.
apple doesn't own a prison nor do they have jurisdiction, this is a civil matter and thus no criminal charges would be brought worth.Those employees if proven are going to go to jail for a long time. Apple will make sure they end up in a Russian prison at this rate
Also Apple is being reasonable , they are not asking the company to be shut down , they are asking for royalties for using its tech
while Apple builds a campus in San Diego CA whose sole purpose is to poach Qualcomm engineers
It could potentially lead to criminal investigations and criminal charges, so we can’t rule that out, but yes, as it stands, this is a civil action and not a criminal action, so there won’t be jail time from this. (Honestly, white collar crime is typically hard to get serious jail time for, if just because most white collar criminals likely couldn’t survive stints in anything but minimum security jail. It also helps that they’re not viewed as a violence risk, unlike, say, someone in jail for burglary and/or assault, let alone sexual assault or murder).apple doesn't own a prison nor do they have jurisdiction, this is a civil matter and thus no criminal charges would be brought worth.