After wading through this thread I decided to check out the original document filed to the court about the galaxy.
Apple claims exactly 7 Designelements to be violated:
I'll try my best to translate this for those not speaking german:
(i) a rectangular Product with 4 evenly rounded edges
(ii) a flat clear surface covering the front of the product
(iii) the view of a metallic frame around the flat,clear surface
(iv) a display, which is centered below the clear surface
(v) under the clear surface there is a distinct, neutral boundry on all sides of the display
(vi) if the product is tured on, it shows colored icons on the display
Plus the Tab 10.1 copys the remarkable thin profile of the iPad
Now looking at this list and checking the original document that apple filed to protect its design (http://es.scribd.com/doc/61944044/Community-Design-000181607-0001) I would point out that neither the iPad nor the iPad 2 look very much like the "protected" design (just like the Tab 10.1 does not either) combining this with the broken german injunction system ...
but I'll let you be the judge if those claimed design elements are worthy of protection or maybe and just maybe they have been around for some time (even with tablets)
Image(1996)

Guess that device ticks pretty much every box. Still waiting for Samsung to launch that time-machine of theirs. It would be a GameChanger.
----------
Apple now owns the capacitive touchscreen. I learn something new here every day!![]()
Not only that, they "invented" it.