Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Because you think 20MP quality in 7mm thick module is possible... Go read your physics book and come back to me.

There are already 16MP and 20MP sensors in cell phones and the 6+ already beats them. Because 8MP is adapted to the size of the sensor you can put in there with a thickness X.

Apple could go slightly bigger, but that would mean adding 1-2mm to the thickness of the module. They'd have to make the phone thicker at the top than bottom for that.
----------



Oh, really, they can bypass physics too? They can invent light from thin air?

----------



All reviews say different. You better google more and better.

I have not seen any reviewer taking a picture like what I said. You can try it by yourself. Try take a picture of someone with bright background light.
 
I dont think apple will jump from 8MP to 21MP. They are slow in terms of câmera improvements. Next Iphone will be like the Samsung S4 13MP then 16MP and then 21MP In 2017 lol


Why on earth would they go to 16MP, let alone 21MP. At most they'd go to 12MP if they can keep the picture quality up. Not sure if its even possible.
 
hate to break it to you, but the next-gen iPhone has already been in process, and isn't likely to use any new chips just announced. apple doesnt usually turn on a dime, and rarely w/ a brand new component.

Hate to break it to you, but Apple probably doesn't learn about new chips that its suppliers have been working on by reading about the announcement on MacRumors.
 
I have not seen any reviewer taking a picture like what I said. You can try it by yourself. Try take a picture of someone with bright background light.

Seriously, I'm tired, there are litterally 100 reviews that says the opposite of what you say. Talking to you is useless if your not able to go look for them.
 
Hate to break it to you, but Apple probably doesn't learn about new chips that its suppliers have been working on by reading about the announcement on MacRumors.

Its probable that Apple will use all those same techs... But in a smaller sensor. I think they'll possibly to to 10MP next. They have enough volume that sony can custom make one for them ;-). But I wouldn't bet big money on Apple going bigger. They"ll only do it if it objectively improves the photo.
 
Just ftr, I still don't want a larger iPhone. 5/4S for me. But I'm also still on iOS 6...

Actually, I'm with you on that. I prefer the size of the iPhone 4, but did upgrade to the 5s. I'm personally not a fan of the size of the 6, though I can see why lots of people love it.
 
Apple is going to release this with the iPhone 8 arn't they... Samsung, quick, do something to get Apple to have to release it with the 6s!
 
So, its Apple's fault, the IOS camera is hinded when they use the same parts.

I wouldn't be surprised on that one.

Apple first leaves photographers in the dark on desktop..... so it's understandable.

Plus, it would force those customers to buy a actually camera, and not just use the phone in your pocket (if Apple only allowed 16Megapixels in an iPhone 5s,6 and/or 6 Plus)


Hello 10-20MB file sizes *waves*
 
Okay Apple, time to fill those iMac 5k Retina screens, don't you think?

Wishlist bulletpoint.

Glassed Silver:mac

PS: Yes, MP matter. Anyone who wants to crop a part of an image and not be left with a forum avatar pictures sized thumbnail will agree.

Where does this come from? Not that long ago people were using single digit MP DSLRs to make poster size prints. What are you cropping? A single grain of sand from a photo of a beach? This sounds like CSI level megacrop.

The reason smartphone photos don't crop well isn't the MP, it's the lack of fine detail due to the strained optics.
 
I don't care at all about megapixels. Who wants huge file sizes on a phone at this point? I'll take 21 megapixels in a 4-5 years when storage increases again, upload speeds increase (for cloud storage) and the sensors and lenses get better. Apple has been incredibly smart thus far in keeping the camera at 8 MP and focusing on improving the sensors and the lens. Let's hope they keep it that way.
 
Apple never gave a number for low light sensitivity. In 2011 I used iPhones 4 to take some indoor pictures. Outside is sunshine. The people's faces are comparatively dark. When I turn the focus on the faces, I can make the faces brighter and clear to see. Today with the new iPhones it seems I can not make this kind shots.

I have not seen any reviewer taking a picture like what I said. You can try it by yourself. Try take a picture of someone with bright background light.

This has nothing to do with low light. (actually every review, even the one you posted, shows, that the 5, but especially 5s improved low light performance).

It has do to with dynamic range (backlit situations are to much for every sensor out there) and metering. Meter for the head and let the highlights blow. this way you get the facial expression but everything around it is just white
 
hate to break it to you, but the next-gen iPhone has already been in process, and isn't likely to use any new chips just announced. apple doesnt usually turn on a dime, and rarely w/ a brand new component.

I like to break it to you that future Macs which will include the Broadwell chips are also already in R&D, even if they are not yet currently produced, with or without prototype confirmation. The MBA '13 was not released long after the Haswell introduction and camera elements are not too hard to include f you know what you're dealing with.
 
PS: Yes, MP matter. Anyone who wants to crop a part of an image and not be left with a forum avatar pictures sized thumbnail will agree.

Funny people's still talking about MP, or any photo attributes, as a stand-alone quality these days. Matter to who? Does iPhone tiny len can resolve 21 M. resolution?
 
It highlights this article's relevance to Apple considering this is an Apple blog.

Sonny is also a competitor. Let's not forget also that even Ivy mentioned that the 'inspiration' behind the iconic iPhone 4 / 5 designs is Sony
 
Presumably a 21-megapixel sensor would create better quality 10-megapixel images than a 10-megapixel sensor. The same thing for 4k down to 1080p.

Very poor assumption.

A 21megapixel sensor, has much smaller pixels than a 10megapixel sensor. Meaning much less surface area per pixel for light. Meaning more noise.

An increase in MP while maintaining approximate sensor size typically decreases quality.
 
If Apple do add a 4K camera to the iPhone, will they up the 5GB of storage we get with iCloud, so we can store the videos there?
 
At 16 or 21 MP images, Apple better have some sort of 256GB iPhone / iPad model somewhere in R&D to ensure there is enough space on the devices for those file sizes!

Nope. They want you to pay for iCloud. If apple cared about your device filling up with crap they wouldn't sell a 16GB model at all.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.