Yes device by device, then total first product verification. Ugh.If it’s anything like the problems that occur at my work when our CNC Network goes down then I will say it will be more like a week, and that’s if they know for certain how to fix it.
Yes device by device, then total first product verification. Ugh.If it’s anything like the problems that occur at my work when our CNC Network goes down then I will say it will be more like a week, and that’s if they know for certain how to fix it.
You are always a confident person.![]()
placing blame for the virus attack on a variant of the 2017 WannaCry ransomware.
These SCADA networks need to be better protected. I've seen so many that are simply routeable subnets from the internal subnets.
Article states it was from "misoperation" during software installation. How can you attribute this to a competitor doing something?
“We are surprised and shocked,” Wei told reporters. “We have installed tens of thousands of tools before, and this is the first time this happened.”
Never said it wasn't a competitor. I'm saying that's not the only possible source.Because TMSC said it was a variant of the Wanacry virus which means that it is deliberate. You can not accidentally do something in software and then you end up with a virus that takes down nearly all your machines. Not unless there is something deliberate there.
An employee might have clicked on a file they should not have done and accidentally run the virus. That would account for the misoperation part. But nothing in the story accounts for how the virus got there in the first place.
The fact that the tool that was likely infected came from a unidentified source means it could thus be some nefarious actor or competitor.
An unidentified vendor? More like an "unidentified ex-vendor".
Samsung needed more production.
Wait and see what effects come from this. I read elsewhere TMSC has been making the A12 CPU for quite a while at this point - so Apple should already have a bunch of the CPU's on hand for the new iPhones.
How would “misoperation” cause such a catastrophic virus???These SCADA networks need to be better protected. I've seen so many that are simply routeable subnets from the internal subnets.
Article states it was from "misoperation" during software installation. How can you attribute this to a competitor doing something?
Maybe executing a binary that is infected?Probably Samsung and or Qualcomm.
[doublepost=1533594335][/doublepost]
How would “misoperation” cause such a catastrophic virus???