Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well, the Tandy is vintage, but Radio Shack is very much in business here in the US! They even sell and install Starlink, which for folks in the mountains here, is the only fast Internet access available.
Well I'll be. There is even one down the street from me that I don't even recall seeing. They did go bankrupt and got bought by General Wireless

 
  • Like
Reactions: vjl323
I'm getting old, I read that as Tandy display and though WTH, Radio Shack has been out of business for a very long time.

View attachment 2391999
My business partner and I ran a manufactures rep business with that machine for over two years (86-88). Order entry, commission reports, line card, correspondence. We had a separate fax machine, but sent faxes from it at some point. Geez, I’m not old, I’m ancient.
 
500 nits is fine for an M5 MacBook Air. It's not so fine for an M5 Max MacBook Pro, precisely because of HDR editing.
Completely agreed! After using vivid on my Pro Display XDR and benefiting from the improved visibility of the M4 iPad Pro’s display in brighter environments, I can’t go back to 500 nits as a maximum. Increases in brightness capability is not only beneficial for increased HDR impact (greater contrast ratio -> improved picture quality) but also is a quality of life improvement for using devices in suboptimal lighting conditions. Not everyone needs devices that can get that bright for their usage situations but for me it’s been very helpful and it’s just nice to have the option to turn things up to 11 if I need it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EugW
My business partner and I ran a manufactures rep business with that machine for over two years (86-88). Order entry, commission reports, line card, correspondence. We had a separate fax machine, but sent faxes from it at some point. Geez, I’m not old, I’m ancient.
VisiCalc FTW
 
Will this eventually allow OLED pixels to shine as bright as LED HDR? If we stack enough OLEDs or whatever.
 
Of course Apple spun this as if they invented this dual-layer solution, but obviously that's not the case. I know they are very hands-on and do contribute engineering, but was this actually an industry collaboration that no one company owns the rights to?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9081094
Curious on your estimate of TOTAL MBP buyers, how many do HDR video editing? More than 50%? Because otherwise you're just overcharging most of your customers by including tech that is for just a very small minority (who, TBH, probably use larger Pro monitors).
Uh, that argument doesn't make much sense. If you don't need it, then don't buy it. Apple shouldn't build a M5 Max MacBook Pro to cater to corporate executives who buy MacBook Pros to run MS Office. That's what the MacBook Air is for.

Of course Apple spun this as if they invented this dual-layer solution, but obviously that's not the case. I know they are very hands-on and do contribute engineering, but was this actually an industry collaboration that no one company owns the rights to?
I don't recall Apple claiming they invented this technology. Do you have a link? In fact, it's been around for a couple of years now, albeit in low volume.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zachchen1996
Uh, that argument doesn't make much sense. If you don't need it, then don't buy it. Apple shouldn't build a M5 Max MacBook Pro to cater to corporate executives who buy MacBook Pros to run MS Office. That's what the MacBook Air is for.


I don't recall Apple claiming they invented this technology. Do you have a link? In fact, it's been around for a couple of years now, albeit in low volume.
What doesn't make sense is your conclusion that only HDR video editors buy MBP's and if you don't do HDR video editing, get a MBA?
You truly think there is no other purpose for the performance a MBP offers over the MBA other than video editing? So my question goes unanswered -- what percentage of MBP buyers do HDR video editing (hint: it's not 100%).
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: zachchen1996
What doesn't make sense is your conclusion that only HDR video editors buy MBP's and if you don't do HDR video editing, get a MBA?
You truly think there is no other purpose for the performance a MBP offers over the MBA other than video editing? So my question goes unanswered -- what percentage of MBP buyers do HDR video editing (hint: it's not 100%).
Meh. Nobody ever has claimed high end MacBook Pro buyers are 100% video editors (although there are an awful lot of them). That's a straw man argument.

What should be pretty obvious to most people, the point I am making is that these screens truly are very nice, and have very good real world advantages, but are most advantageous for those who do HDR video editing, etc. In that context, Apple is building the high end models to benefit those high end users. However, if you don't want to spend the money on them, then you don't have to, because other very capable models are available. But there is nothing stopping you from buying it if you happen to want to for whatever reason.

BTW, for the record, I am not a video editor either, but I bought the iPad Pro M4 specifically because of the tandem OLED display. I don't need even M2 performance in my iPad Pro, but I bought the iPad Pro M4 because the screen is just so much nicer than the iPad Air's screen. It's not even in the same league.

Screenshot 2024-06-25 at 11.27.12 AM.png
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: zachchen1996
Apple could have put traditional 2.8K OLED panels in their MacBook Air series and no one would have complained (and most would say how great they look). They're cheap enough that Apple could have used them and NOT raised the price! And in the Air, no one is expecting "Pro" specs. Apple sticks with low-tech panels in the Air instead.

Low tech? They‘re one of the best displays you can put into such a machine. High res, plenty bright, great viewing angles and accurate colors. Most people are wowed by these panels.

Just think of the targeted audience: tech illiterate average joe and even more tech illiterate plain jane. Those buyers want a machine that does some web, office and photo editing and are willing to pay the Apple tax for it being nice and pretty to look at. Such buyers don’t give a crap about the latest panel tech.
 
Reduced power consumption and increased brightness are both good, obviously. But new tech (and double some components?) probably means increased cost, too... though it would hopefully come down over time.
There are already snapdragon elite laptops with this display. I believe dell has one and it’s cheaper than an M3 air.

 
Set the brightness to the maximum, and voilà : no more PWM
Totally true :—) I've been doing this with iPhones for as long as I can remember. I would only add that if screen gets too bright you can use an option to "Reduce White Point" and still get all the benefits for non-PWM usage.
 


OLED iPad Pro panel maker LG Display has begun mass producing the industry's first 13-inch tandem OLED panel designed for laptops, the Korean company announced this week.

lg-display-tandem-oled-laptop.jpg

LG Display supplies the majority of OLED panels for Apple's latest M4 iPad Pro models, which use a similar tandem structure. Tandem OLED panels combine two stacks of red, green, and blue (RGB) organic light emitting layers, which together offer better durability and performance compared to single-layer OLED panels such as the one used in Apple's iPhones.

LG has been developing the panels for the automotive industry since 2019, and says that efficiency gains mean they reduce power consumption by up to 40%, and enable up to three times the brightness. By designing the components and enhancing the structure of the 13-inch tandem OLED panel, LG Display says it has also been able to make it around 40% thinner and 28% lighter than existing OLED laptop screens, allowing for a sleek design and greater portability.

From LG Display's press release:
There are currently no Macs with OLED displays. However, according to a November 2023 report by analyst Jeff Pu of Haitong International Technology Research, Apple is actively developing an OLED screen for the ‌MacBook Air‌, although the release of an OLED MacBook Pro is expected to come first.

An earlier report by Bloomberg's Mark Gurman claimed that a new MacBook Pro with an OLED display could be the first touchscreen Mac in 2025. Notably LG Display says that it has also embedded a touch sensor inside its latest tandem OLED panels to improve touch performance.

Article Link: Apple Supplier Unveils 'Industry First' Tandem OLED Laptop Panel
A 14" MacBook Pro would need 3024-by-1964 so this development would need further development before Apple uses it for their MacBook Pro. I rather don't see it used in a 13" MacBook Air. And that uses 2560-by-1664 resolution.
 
I need this to be able to see why i've been suspended from the forum in the deepest black font possible.
 
Many or some?
Many.
And many people don't realize they are affected.

From what I’ve been able to read on the subject, the double OLED layers cut down on the PWM effect. I don’t know if it would solve the issue entirely but it is supposed to help.
That's good to hear. I hope it makes a major improvement, but my hope is slim.

I’ll put your complaint in with those claiming their Watch burns their skin and WiFi gives them headaches. A tiny minority trying to dictate how something is built.

I'm not understanding why you believe this might be helpful. This is one review showing that the latest iPad uses a very low frequency PWM frequency.

Set the brightness to the maximum, and voilà : no more PWM
In some cases that helps, but it does not disable PWM for Apple products because Apple's software 100% brightness is not the true hardware 100% brightness, therefore, PWM is always used at all brightnesses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saturn007
I'm not understanding why you believe this might be helpful. This is one review showing that the latest iPad uses a very low frequency PWM frequency.
Exactly. Don't get this one if you are PWM senstive. On the other hand I have a good experience with the M1 iPP.
 
Many or some?

This is the bastard about percentages and large numbers. Companies always say the same thing.

"This issue affects a small percentage of users."

Apple claims to have, what, around 900 million active users? 1% is 9 million people.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: zoga
Of course Apple spun this as if they invented this dual-layer solution, but obviously that's not the case. I know they are very hands-on and do contribute engineering, but was this actually an industry collaboration that no one company owns the rights to?
I am not sure Apple actually had anything to do with the development of this tech other than the fact that "Apple supplier" developed it (who also happens to be a supplier to multiple industries not just Apple). As I understand tandem OLED displays were originally developed for car displays (a year or two ago) and then adopted for tablets and laptops.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.