Ha, can't believe I missed that. Sounds like they outsourced the question writing to ChatGPT.What is the ByteDance Pro? After searching for it online, as far as I can tell it doesn’t exist.
Ha, can't believe I missed that. Sounds like they outsourced the question writing to ChatGPT.What is the ByteDance Pro? After searching for it online, as far as I can tell it doesn’t exist.
Makes no sense to send these surveys out to only some current Vision Pro users. They've proved they'll buy luxury garbage tech no matter the cost or compromise. Apple wanting to live in their echo chamber, apparently.
I wish this childish hate toward Apple would stop already. I'm sure there are better hobbies than spending hours expressing hate (mostly unwarranted) and nonsensical hyperbole toward Apple. Some obviously enjoy reading post after post of this, but I don't. I want valid information, and honest and useful discussion of issues with Apple and their products.Thank you for paying $3.5k to join our market research beta test. Now can we have some data too?
I agree as far as something that could explode in popularity. But the vision pro is still very useful as a way to test out ideas with a real world audience.I've said this for years — glasses are the only form factor that will get any real marketshare for face wearables. Anything else is a waste of time and resources. Whether Apple can compete in this space has yet to be seen, but it is the only way they'll have a chance.
I remember completing an Apple survey in 2006 or 2007 about my MacBook (the white plastic one) with questions about each of the ports, if I had used them, and how. I was still a new Apple customer, but surprised that "Steve" wanted to know how I was using the device.“We don’t know what we’re doing”
How can you draw a conclusion when you have absolutely no idea of why Apple did so. I'm quite sure that they have a valid reason that you are not aware of and don't want to consider.Makes no sense to send these surveys out to only some current Vision Pro users.
Thanks so much for insulting me. You have NO idea of what my motivations were in purchasing the device. Generalizing hate like this doesn't help anyone except those that practice schadenfreude.They've proved they'll buy luxury garbage tech no matter the cost or compromise. Apple wanting to live in their echo chamber, apparently.
Those would have to be approved for use while driving first, which would also have them limit the available functions, so that people don’t start swiping Tinder while driving.If they could make me a set of glasses that worked with Apple CarPlay, to show my speed, directions, potential hazards etc, I would buy it tomorrow. Not all vehicles have a head up display, so this could be a big selling point for wearables.
Thanks so much for insulting me. You have NO idea of what my motivations were in purchasing the device. Generalizing hate like this doesn't help anyone except those that practice schadenfreude.
It's not accepting all kinds of prescriptions that's the killer feature, it's self correcting lenses that would be (cut out the middle man), chuck in AR & it's a winner.As annoyed as I am by Tim Cook’s latest move to strip AR from Apple Glasses in order to ship sooner, they’re still a product I would buy almost immediately. If they replace AirPods, and have a super high quality camera on board, and leverage iPhone for heavy lifting, and have all day battery life, and accept all kinds of prescriptions…they are a no brainer to replace my current glasses.
It still going to need AR in order to convince non-glasses wearers to jump in, but for now there are plenty of us looking to upgrade the thing we already wear to something with more utility.
I absolutely agree.I've said this for years — glasses are the only form factor that will get any real marketshare for face wearables. Anything else is a waste of time and resources. Whether Apple can compete in this space has yet to be seen, but it is the only way they'll have a chance.
Unfortunately I’m no longer a child (and I don’t think childish), nor do I hate Apple. On the contrary, I have been using their products since I first purchased an Apple IIe second hand in 1985.I wish this childish hate toward Apple would stop already. I'm sure there are better hobbies than spending hours expressing hate (mostly unwarranted) and nonsensical hyperbole toward Apple. Some obviously enjoy reading post after post of this, but I don't. I want valid information, and honest and useful discussion of issues with Apple and their products.
(I make abundant use of the ignore file, but the 1000 name limit is not enough).
Ignorance has spoken… let’s move on.Makes no sense to send these surveys out to only some current Vision Pro users. They've proved they'll buy luxury garbage tech no matter the cost or compromise. Apple wanting to live in their echo chamber, apparently.
Wow. We sure disagree. Basic smart marketing research by one of the world's most successful tech companies is not "We don’t know what we’re doing.” It is simply basic smart marketing research.“We don’t know what we’re doing”
I think a cheaper model will actually arrive this year, in the form of the currently shipping M2 based model being offered as the entry level (at say $2,500), and the new M5 powered model taking the current $3,500 model price point. The M5 they could offer improved storage & battery life as well to differentiate.
Eventually with the “Vision Air” the price will be down to $1,999 (“deluxe” plastic, no “eye-sight” external display), and the pro probably slots in at $2,999 with better resolution as well.
I dont get the reference in the last sentence of the article referring to future models having “Mac grade processor” ????? The Vision Pro is already using a Mac grade processor?