Apple Switching Back to NVIDIA for Next-Generation MacBook Pro Graphics Chips?

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
48,743
10,148





SemiAccurate reports that Apple will be transitioning back to NVIDIA from AMD as its graphics chip supplier for the next-generation MacBook Pro models offering discrete graphics. The move comes after Apple just recently completed a multi-year effort to switch its entire Mac lineup from NVIDIA to AMD.
Yes, your read that right, Nvidia has won the next round of Macs, likely starting with the Ivy Bridge models next spring. About three years after the decision to boot Nvidia out of the company was made, and two years after the first ATI/AMD Macs in recent memory hit the shelves, you will see Nvidia macs reappearing. I guess 'never' at Apple means single digit years.
The report notes that discrete graphics for notebooks are a shrinking market as notebooks become smaller and thinner and integrated graphics solutions from the likes of Intel and AMD continue to improve.

Graphics performance has indeed been an issue for Apple's smallest machines over the past several years as it has sought to balance both CPU and GPU performance. Licensing restrictions from Intel prevented third-party graphics manufacturers such as NVIDIA from building integrated graphics solutions for Intel's most recent processors, forcing Apple to choose between subpar integrated graphics from Intel and older Intel Core 2 Duo CPUs that could still be paired with third-party integrated graphics.

With Intel's integrated graphics improving significantly over the past year, Apple has finally been able to transition its small notebooks to all-Intel solutions, while its larger notebooks continue to offer switchable graphics using the integrated Intel and discrete AMD options. It now appears, however, that Apple will be moving back to NVIDIA for those discrete options.

As integrated graphics continues to improve, they may also eat into the discrete GPU market in larger machines. Apple is also said to be preparing to launch a thinner 15" notebook, although it is unclear at this time whether it will be positioned as a MacBook Pro revamp or a new MacBook Air size. There is no word yet on Apple's plans for the new machine's capabilities, but it seems reasonable that Apple may at some point begin transitioning larger machines in the thinner form factors that have proven very popular with consumers to integrated graphics alone.

The report from SemiAccurate does not address Apple's GPU plans for its desktop models, which also currently utilize AMD for their discrete graphics after also having been included in the recent transition from NVIDIA to AMD.

Article Link: Apple Switching Back to NVIDIA for Next-Generation MacBook Pro Graphics Chips?
 

AJH1993

macrumors regular
Oct 26, 2011
154
0
The nvidia GPU's in the i5 Macbook Pro (330M series) had some heat problems. One of my friends with this kind of Macbook Pro says his macbook will kernel panic if the GPU gets too hot.
 

Doctor Q

Administrator
Staff member
Sep 19, 2002
38,002
4,306
Los Angeles
For such a large company Apple can seem surprisingly light on its feet when it comes to changing suppliers.
 

ayeying

macrumors 601
Dec 5, 2007
4,547
11
Yay Area, CA
The nvidia GPU's in the i5 Macbook Pro (330M series) had some heat problems. One of my friends with this kind of Macbook Pro says his macbook will kernel panic if the GPU gets too hot.
I have that video card and I have a core i7 model. I never had a kernel panic nor ever did the GPU ever get above 85 deg C.
 

iMouse

macrumors 6502
Jul 23, 2002
252
17
Boardman, Ohio
Meh...

Who cares.

I see no benefits or drawbacks from the move if NVIDIA can continue to provide a reliable product. I cringe every time I see a pre-unibody MBP with a GeForce 8600...a ticking time bomb.

As for PhysX....yeah, whatever...or more like whenever.

When Intel gets over themselves and allows ATI and NVIDIA to design chipset/GPU combos for the Core i-series again, I'll be happy.
 
Last edited:

Hastings101

macrumors 68020
Jun 22, 2010
2,161
863
K
Darn, I liked Apple using ATI/AMD, I always have less problems with their graphics cards.
 

kingtj

macrumors 68030
Oct 23, 2003
2,593
738
Brunswick, MD
Yeah, I agree with the "meh" comment, more or less!

Bottom line is, give us a laptop with exceptionally good graphics performance and I'm happy!

It's been at least a decade since anyone really offered a discreet video card option besides either ATI or nVidia. With only those 2 players around, it's rather foolish to pretend one of them universally "sucks" and only products from the other one are "good". It's much more of a situation where both of them put out a lot of decent products and both of them occasionally screw up.

Apple is wise to remain flexible and pick whatever works best for their latest products from whoever will give them the better quantity pricing.

There will always be the "edge cases" (such as users spending 90% of their time in a specific graphics app that happens to be better optimized for drivers from one of these two manufacturers). For *them*, they might have a valid reason to prefer or avoid a new Apple portable using only nVidia chipsets. For everyone else, I think it's a relative non-issue.
 

mabaker

macrumors 65816
Jan 19, 2008
1,117
288
NVIDIA's Cuda + i7 = heaven.

NVIDIA is still supporting their CUDA drivers for Mac OS X, you have to download them separately, tho. Valid even for the m9400.
 

besweeeet

macrumors member
Sep 11, 2011
43
0
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)

NVIDIA GPUs are faster and more power efficient. What's not to like? And the grammar errors from the source are kinda weird...
 

CJM

macrumors 65816
May 7, 2005
1,364
625
U.K.
Apple are switching because nVidia no doubt showed off their new tech and vendors are impressed by it.
 

commander.data

macrumors 65816
Nov 10, 2006
1,014
104
Apple always switch back and forth between AMD and nVidia every 2 generations or so, so this is hardly unexpected. The current impediment with nVidia GPUs is that they only support 2 displays, compared to AMD Thunderbolt Macs which can drive 3 displays. Intel is also adding 3 display support to Ivy Bridge. Presumably, nVidia is adding >2 display support in their next gen parts which make them more viable.
 

ZipZap

macrumors 603
Dec 14, 2007
5,503
910
Apple knows that there are only two major discrete GPU vendors. I really do not understand the "never again" attitude only to need come crawling back.

Charlie gets hits regardless.
Perhaps because it was a "chip on Steves shoulder" decision and with him gone, we'll begin to see more unbiased decisions.
 

Torrijos

macrumors 6502
Jan 10, 2006
381
17
Here I was dreaming of Apple creating their own CPU/GPU design based on ARM A15 & A9 and PowerVR series 6 for discrete graphic performance but more importantly openCL optimization.

OpenGL has lost the PC crowd to directX due to the high end gaming market, so OpenGL is only important for Apple and the Pro market (CAD/CAO mainly), and Apple has been neglecting its drivers for years.

Intel integrated graphics too are behind on the OpenGL specification and until Ivy Bridge no openCL support either.

Anyway, Nvidia has to be pretty desperate right now, big chuncks of its market will one day or another be replaced by integrated designs, and while AMD still has its CPU business Nvidia mobile designs have flopped until now.
 

Eidorian

macrumors Penryn
Mar 23, 2005
29,085
290
Indianapolis
Apple are switching because nVidia no doubt showed off their new tech and vendors are impressed by it.
The first few batches of 28 nm GPUs appear to be mobile and midrange. Still, I have a feeling we are going to end up with 40 nm, optimized relabels even well into Ivy Bridge's release.
 

69650

Suspended
Mar 23, 2006
3,367
1,877
England
I don't know why Apple doesn't just buy AMD and design their own chips like they do with the ARM chips. It seems to work well with the iPad/iPhone. The market cap for AMD is approx $4bn compared to Intel's market cap of $125bn.
 

Naimfan

Suspended
Jan 15, 2003
4,669
2,012
I don't care who the graphics vendor is - all I care about is a laptop that can do what I need it to. And the current 13" with integrated Intel HD3000 graphics is just fine. Note that I don't do anything graphics intensive, but the overwhelming majority of people don't either.

If nVidia graphics chips run cooler/with less power draw, Apple switching back to them supports the idea that Apple is looking to thin the next MBP.

----------

Apple knows that there are only two major discrete GPU vendors. I really do not understand the "never again" attitude only to need come crawling back.
Apple "crawling back?"

:rolleyes:

Do you REALLY believe that corporations like Apple and nVidia think that way? Especially when Apple could quite literally write a check and buy nVidia.
 

notjustjay

macrumors 603
Sep 19, 2003
6,050
157
Canada, eh?
Apple "crawling back?"

:rolleyes:

Do you REALLY believe that corporations like Apple and nVidia think that way? Especially when Apple could quite literally write a check and buy nVidia.
Yeah. All this colorful language ("crawling back", "never again", etc.) may be appropriate for personal relationships and politics but in business, you use whatever makes the most business sense.

Frankly I don't care who makes what as long as it works well.
 

xraydoc

macrumors demi-god
Oct 9, 2005
7,698
1,860
192.168.1.1
So I guess we're stuck with integrated graphics on the smaller models (11", 13") for the foreseeable future, eh?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.