You are not understanding the concept of the kindle or possibly the Apple tablet "free 3G" connectivity.
The 3G service is not incorporated into the price of the device, it is incorporated into the content. So every download from the app store, music store, movie store, etc will have a small transmission fee payment sent to the service provider that Apple partners with.
The Kindle has Whispernet which is provided by Sprint. Sprint gets a payment every time someone purchases an ebook.
The Apple tablet will be a content device, the price of 3G connectivity will be built into the content price. If you download a movie via the tablet 3G then part of the purchase price will go to Apple and part of the purchase price will go to Verizon.
Most likely this type of connectivity will be limited. To have full connectivity you will need to access the internet via WiFi or tethering to a 3G phone.
Just saw this on reddit, not sure how legitimate it is...
Far too industrial in design.
I could believe it might be how Apples tested the hardware and software, but I cannot believe that is the shipping form factor.
VOIP is already somewhat there (there's several VOIP apps already).
But if the revolution you seek involves a significant drop in costs to make 3G-like calls via a 3G connection, I wouldn't hold my breath. That's exactly what AT&T, Verizon, etc do NOT want, which is why this Tablet is not going to end up with some kind of 3G special plan priced well below current 3G plans. They are not going to want this Tablet to end up being the best deal in the U.S. for making fully mobile (3G) calls- VOIP or otherwise.
I can imagine a Tethering deal for existing iPhone people, but I could also see that becoming hack-city, meaning it would quickly be hacked for all devices (laptops, etc) tethered use.
More likely, I imagine a dedicated SIM with either:
Note that both have a cost, though the former would be just a one-time cost, while the latter amps up the monthly revenue stream for AT&T. On the flipside, the former limits usage to one device or the other at any given time, while the latter would make both devices (3G access) usable at the same time. Along with an option for no 3G functionality (wifi/wimax only), I very much suspect something like these options for existing iPhone people that want to add a Tablet.
- a one-time setup fee for iPhone people to link the Tablet to their iPhone contract deal (use one or use the other but not both at the same time), or
- a modest extra monthly fee to add this to your existing iPhone contract (comparable to adding a second phone to a cell phone contract)
But I see no possibilities for consumers to score a big win via 3G VOIP at the expense of the monopoly Goliaths of AT&T, Verizon, etc. They know very clearly where their bread is buttered.
Not legitimate at all. There is NO WAY that this ugly pile of crap came out of Apple.Just saw this on reddit, not sure how legitimate it is.
I can't believe the level of conversation and language in this thread.
All the hardware rumors don't really interest me. I just don't think it's very important.
The software is what will make or break this device. I hope Apple can lauch it with an excellent suite of apps with functionality that is intuitive and impossible to attain on other devices.
Pass. I see no use for this device for my needs. It doesn't do anything my phone or laptop can't do. I am sure it will find it's niche.
Let me apologise in advance for this, but I really hate the concept that a device that doesn't run 'basic mac '(i.e. OS X) desktop applications is a toy.
Why, in the name of all that's holy, would you want to run a desktop application on a 10" screen that's controlled with your finger? It doesn't make any sense, applications MUST be built around the OS and input methods available on a platofrm, it's why Windows Tablets are all crap (and trust me, that's from experience) - it's a compromise that brings no benefits for the user and almost always results in a worse experience that a mouse and keyboard that the app was designed for.
Now, on the concept of it being a 'toy' - bollocks quite frankly. Is it a device for professionals? No, but again no 10" touchscreen device is going to be, the format has built in limitations. If you want to run apps like that for the love of god buy a laptop with a nice big screen, keyboard and mouse/trackpad. However if you're a normal home user that browses the web, watches movies and creates content with stuff like iPhoto and iMovie instead of Photoshop and Premier then it could be perfect. Make the apps super simple with enough functionality to produce good results and target it at home users. Give it enough local storage to not need a host PC to sync with. Make it trivial to find apps, music, movies and publications. Make it instant-on and require virtually zero maintenance. Hey presto, the first true consumer computer.
like maybe a skill testing question....such as 1+1 or somthing.
Not legitimate at all. There is NO WAY that this ugly pile of crap came out of Apple.
On this week's MacBreak Weekly, Leo and the gang were discussing this. Alex Lindsay said he thinks that the bandwidth cost of downloading whatever content would be included in the price of that content. So a couple of cents or whatever would go to the provider each time you downloaded something. This precludes, of course, the ability to send and receive data for regular surfing, email, etc., which would require WiFi.
Just speculation, but a cool model. Is this what the Kindle does?
Built in connectivity (ala Kindle) had better be there. The last thing I need is yet another $60 a month data plan. I have enough of those already.
If you expect free 3G, you'll be sorely disappointed.
Bingo! MacBook Air without a fold-out keyboard!
Same here. I don't want 3G on my Tablet! I want Wi-Fi only. I have an iPhone if I need to look something up while walking through the park.
You know what Apple's solution will be for the ear bud problems? Simply stop including them with ipods, iphones, etc. To Apple, most people probably use their own preferred headphones anyway, so why loose profit share by including better/more expensive headphones? Those who really want Apple branded headphones that are of decent quality can spend 80 bucks on the Apple in-ear phones.
Obviously I am with you - I do think Apple should be including better quality headsets, but from a cost/benefit perspective, I wouldn't be surprised if Apple completely drops the headphones in future consumer devices.
I do not think it means what you think it means...... and for the americans who don't understand the word "Bollocks", in the sentence above it means what a load of old s..t.![]()
Wikipedia said:Bollocks is a word of Anglo-Saxon origin, meaning "testicles". The word is often used figuratively in British English slang, as a noun to mean "nonsense", an expletive following a minor accident or misfortune, or an adjective to mean "poor quality" or "useless". Similarly, the common phrases "Bollocks to this!" or "That's a load of old bollocks" generally indicate contempt for a certain task, subject or opinion. Conversely, the word also figures in idiomatic phrases such as "the dog's bollocks" and "top bollock(s)", which usually refer to something which is admired, approved of or well-respected.
You realize that engineers, when we are testing our system designs, build prototypes that look nothing at all like the final design, right?
You are not understanding the concept of the kindle or possibly the Apple tablet "free 3G" connectivity.
The 3G service is not incorporated into the price of the device, it is incorporated into the content. So every download from the app store, music store, movie store, etc will have a small transmission fee payment sent to the service provider that Apple partners with.
If there is a subsidised price I'm curious what will happen here in the UK. We have now got 3 different providers, O2, Vodafone and Orange, plus Tesco Mobile who run on the back of O2.
Their prices are all almost identical, there is absolutely no competition. Would more than likely be the same for the slate/pad or whatever it will be called.![]()