He probably meant "meaningful" competition. I think it says a lot when you have to sell your product below cost just to clear inventory. In what bizarro world is it considered a viable business practice to ship at a loss just to achieve volume?
Clearly they can't compete with Apple on anything other than price points of the device and therefore go all in thinking they will win all the while Apple continues to make a profit at their continued expense. It's not a strategy to success, to subsidise your competitions profit by forsaking your own. Steve wouldn't have let that happen ...
It pays to be be positioned either high-end-volume or low-cost-volume, the middle is much tougher to compete in because you are fighting to fronts, the high-end and the low cost.
Apple is really only pitched against itself, it's the only true path.