Every year the stock manipulators spread false rumors of production cuts and production difficulties. Every single year. And every year everyone falls for it.
What's most amazing is that some people seem to think that this is out of greed, that by making fewer iPhones available this somehow increases demand. They can't get it into their thick skulls that if you don't have enough products, you can't sell as many products as you could otherwise.
[doublepost=1528618535][/doublepost]
I know what it requires - did you even read my question?
What I'm saying is that they market it as a "new phone every year" however, those that bought the iPhone X on launch day will theoretically never be able to get a new phone at launch again (assuming Apple goes back to the traditional late September launch period) unless they pay the additional 2 months of payments. Which basically means you're paying for two months of a phone that you're not using effectively increasing the cost of your new phone.
What's the problem with not getting a new phone on launch date? Are people so obsessive that they need to buy at launch date? If anyone has problems waiting two months for a new phone, then they should seek medical treatment.
[doublepost=1528618817][/doublepost]
10-bit color "capture & display" is the ONLY new feature / capability that will prompt the masses to Upgrade ... and AAPL very-likely knows this ... as such, if they are reducing their Orders, then 10-bit color support is very-likely NOT being added later this year
"The masses" don't even know what "10 bit color capture and display" is supposed to mean.
[doublepost=1528619031][/doublepost]
I don’t see Apple giving up millions of dollars for loyalty. Either someone will need to compress their 12 month obligation into a shorter time period (effectively raising the per month fee) or wait. Apple won’t give up that much money just for goodwill. Now I can see them adding the overage onto the monthly payments instead of making people pay it upfront. That would solve the problem without them losing out on millions.
Every iPhone X that gets upgraded to an iPhone X+ means Apple has one phone in their hands that they need to sell as refurbished to make up the difference between cost of the iPhone and 12 monthly payments.
[doublepost=1528619317][/doublepost]
Yes, it would, and suppliers protect themselves from substantial changes to supply orders with contractual penalties should they occur.
I can really see Apple agreeing to a contract with penalties for reducing orders
Apple isn't saying "we order 60 million parts for this year" and then later saying "sorry, we need only 40 million, shame that you built 60". They say "we order 5 million for this month", and then "another five million that month", and then "this month it's only 3 million".
[doublepost=1528619421][/doublepost]
Yes Apple is at risk of imminent collapse. We’ve been hearing that one for the past 5 years. Reality is they are reporting their highest profits ever. This is click bait but probably an attempt to depress the stock value which is good for buyers.
Youngster. The first time that I heard of Apple's imminent collapse was about 1982 or 1983.
[doublepost=1528619839][/doublepost]
Best selling because of the higher cost to the consumers, but it’s not the best selling in volume.
Best selling in volume.