Jarman74
Contributor
I’ve endured years of listless keynotes that could be easily reduced to a ten‑minute recap. This one, though, isn’t something Apple can shrug off with a slap on the wrist. They either deliver in full or they crash spectacularly.
That's a great improvement, I can almost read it.
Yeah! I like Stevey 🙂The name Siri is doomed. Apple should had changed that name.
Or, you know.I’ve endured years of listless keynotes that could be easily reduced to a ten‑minute recap. This one, though, isn’t something Apple can shrug off with a slap on the wrist. They either deliver in full or they crash spectacularly.
Add to that their Liquid Glass redesign, which was likely inspired by visionOS and Vision Pro and visionOS itself, their bet on VR. Which also did not have seem to have taken off as expected.This pressure is obviously due to the whole Apple Intelligence fiasco, but I would say there is an additional layer of pressure. Not only do they have to showcase a Siri which reliably aligns with modern users' expectations, but consumers and investors alike look to see how Apple strikes a balance of using AI within it's current strengths, being mindful of privacy and security, and not shoving it in the faces of those who want nothing to do with it. That will not be an easy balance to strike.
iOS 27 - Introducing Liquid Uranium Glass"All systems glow"
Sounds radioactive.
I bet the mood for the teams involved in the presentation is significantly different from pervious years...
In previous years, they would typically be focusing on showcasing their upcoming products from the position of a virtually unblemished brand. The pressure is to ensure the presentation goes well, but it's always easy to present impressive results. Today, I think they are — for the first time in many years — on the back foot, having to reassure both consumers and investors that they are still 'with it' and haven't completely lost the plot.
This pressure is obviously due to the whole Apple Intelligence fiasco, but I would say there is an additional layer of pressure. Not only do they have to showcase a Siri which reliably aligns with modern users' expectations, but consumers and investors alike look to see how Apple strikes a balance of using AI within it's current strengths, being mindful of privacy and security, and not shoving it in the faces of those who want nothing to do with it. That will not be an easy balance to strike.
The pressure is undoubtedly on.
- Previous pre-WWDC moods: Pressure to maintain the brand, peppered with excitement and pride as teams showcase their work.
- This year's pre-WWDC moods: Everyone is watching... Apple is not as untouchable as many previously thought, and the teams behind the presentation know that...
(I'm a corp comms specialist -- this is what I do for a living)
The name Siri is doomed. Apple should had changed that name.
Or, you know.
They present a series of updates that have some things that we care about and other things that we don’t, and the forums light up with complaints no matter what, while the regular consumers could care less and just continue buying iPhones.
You know, like the last… 20 years… Of WWDC.
Honestly, I don’t see that happening anymore.
If Apple fails this time, it’s hard to imagine the company staying in the AI race (assuming it ever truly joined it). There’s no ‘next year we’ll do better,’ no alternate path. I can’t even picture someone like Federighi sticking around for long - and it would be the worst possible debut for the new CEO.
But if Apple delivers on AI, it means it can still do more than merely catch up - and that would mean leading again. Which is why I don’t see any further middle ground.