Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is not a PR tour to explain this issue... Apple just had their WWDC event and as they do every year and engineers go out and speak with the media. They can't help if they're asked these stupid questions and feel a need to explain the what and why of it.

If you took the time and went back and looked, you would find that almost every major release of iOS and macOS have had some feature(s) that had a hardware threshold - meaning some older hardware was incapable of running the feature.

The fact of the matter is that almost everyone complaining about this issue HAVE NO IDEA what is needed to enable this type of multitasking. (This is not about Stage Manager - Apple could certainly make a UI that looks like Stage Manager but did not do the same thing.)
hey man - don't attack the messenger - I get it. Apple is a business, not a charity. Stuff gets old/outdated. They have to sell new stuff.
 
I argue with links and benchmarks, guys like you keep sharing your "feeling" without any links,benchmarks,figures. Continue your love with Apple, no point for me to continue to talk about the truth.

Anyway I have proved ipad pro 2020 which was still in Apple Store in April 2021 has enough cpu, ram, ssd speed to run full ipadOS 16. Apple just use programming to limit "pro updates" to M1 only and the real reason should be because of $$$ more profit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lihp8270
I argue with links and benchmarks, guys like you keep sharing your "feeling" without any links,benchmarks,figures. Continue your love with Apple, no point for me to continue to talk about the truth.

The fact you think this issue has anything to do with benchmarks shows how little you understand how things work.


Anyway I have proved ipad pro 2020 which was still in Apple Store in April 2021 has enough cpu, ram, ssd speed to run full ipadOS 16. Apple just use programming to limit "pro updates" to M1 only and the real reason should be because of $$$ more profit.

The only thing you proved is that you have no clue what you're talking about.
 
There is actually three software that can use fullscreen on most any iPad or iPhone and they are by no means slow!

* shiftscreen
* Citrix workspace
* jump desktop
 
He had clearly explained why full ipadOS 16 can be in older ipads especially pro 2020 and Apple does this should be for $$$.
 
Oh my gosh, the wailing and the gnashing of teeth and the rending of garments in this thread is hilarious.

Does Stage Manager seem like an interesting new take on multitasking? Sure. Is it required to be able to continue using your 2020 iPad Pro as you’ve always used it? No. Does iPadOS 16 make your 2020 iPad Pro unusable? No. Does iPadOS 16 skip your 2020 iPad Pro? No. Do new version of iOS and iPadOS always leave out a handful of features that don’t work well on older hardware? Hell yes. Every time.

Complaining that your 2020 iPad Pro (which was widely-known in 2020 as a minor spec bump whose primary marketable feature was a new camera array including a time-of-flight sensor for AR) doesn’t get one particular new feature, no matter how “cool” it may seem smacks of entitlement.

While it would have been nice for Apple to figure out a way to ship a stripped-down version of Stage Manager for older hardware, we don’t know that it would have been possible to match Apple’s expectations for the user experience while having the feature be any more effective than the existing multitasking paradigm. If it comes down to choosing between “not shipping the feature in older hardware at all” and “shipping a version so stripped-down that it doesn’t provide any material benefit to users,” I think Apple is well within its rights to choose the former.

I expect the delta between what the M-series iPads are capable of and what the A-series iPads are capable of to continue to grow. If you can’t handle having an iPad running an A-series chip, if you cannot live without Stage Manager and whatever future features come out, then by all means, sell your existing hardware and upgrade. Or just learn to live with it and realize that you’re not entitled to new features on your older hardware just because you think they’re cool.
 
If what Apple says is true… then either Stage Manager/iOS is running inflated inefficient code that needs proper optimisation… or the foundation of iOS is fundamentally flawed… I suspect it's the latter, since no other OS fails to multitask dozens upon dozens of open windows.
 
If what Apple says is true… then either Stage Manager/iOS is running inflated inefficient code that needs proper optimisation… or the foundation of iOS is fundamentally flawed… I suspect it's the latter, since no other OS fails to multitask dozens upon dozens of open windows.
Of course it’s a matter of how iOS was designed. I’d have to think there is a team somewhere in Apple trying to design a future operating system for their platforms from the ground up, because a lot of the issues we encounter in iOS and iPadOS today are the results of decisions made a decade and a half ago when iOS was in its infancy.

But it’s also a gross oversimplification to suggest that “iOS is fundamentally flawed … since no other OS fails to multitask dozens upon dozens of open windows.”
 
There is actually three software that can use fullscreen on most any iPad or iPhone and they are by no means slow!

* shiftscreen
* Citrix workspace
* jump desktop
Shift screen is just running webkit . It isn't leveraging IO, Metal GPU, or using video codecs.
Tell me when Shiftscreen can run LumaFusion editing 4k video on an external display while Affinity Photo is juggling a 30 layer 600 MB .psd file. All of which will exert more than 5GB of ram each and go to swap.

And this isn't a pie-in-the-sky use case. Editing images for titles for a 4K social media video is a valid use case for a M1 pro iPad.
 
This failure to see any form of context, in this discussion… in most discussions in the past 5 years, is frankly embarrassing for humanity as a whole.

Nobody owes you anything. Other people know things you don’t. It’s not all about you. There is no big plan. It is what it is. Get over it.
 
I all y'all whiners should return your iPads and get Galaxy devices. Easy peasy. I'm sure Tim Cook will be broken-hearted that y'all don't love him anymore.

They'll never do that. That would require mustering up a wee bit of courage and conviction.

Much easier to engage in some righteous faux outrage for some attention (that's otherwise lacking), and, to feel better inside.
 

Apple says that its new iPad Pro is “more powerful than most Windows PC laptops”​

By Ben Rogerson ( Computer Music , Future Music ) published March 18, 2020
11- and 12.9-inch models promise the highest performance yet seen in an iPad

YOU ARE TELLING ME THAT MY IPAD PRO 2020 cannot run stage manager. I am being lied to by Apple and the fanboys in this rumors forum is touting the company line. Please stop protecting Apple or call out them for their lies. If my 2020 is faster than a PC which actually runs windows, then don't say it can't run Stage Manager. Please stop the lies.


So whenever Apple claims like it just did that the M2 is 20% faster than M1 I am going to remember this 2020 claim - that the 2020 iPad Pro is faster than many pc laptops. Yet, can't run stage manager. Yet those PC laptops had multitasking down better than what stage manager will deliver. I agree with other comments that PC gets much more done with supposedly inferior hardware so the M1 requirement is a red herring. The real issue is with the software design. What if I solder on a PC chip to my iPad Pro - can I then be allowed to run stage manager? (its a joke but you see my point)
 
So iOS 9 was good enough for iPhone 4S but Stage Manager will not deliver a good experience in non-M1 iPads. Apple stop with the cringe please
 
Shift screen is just running webkit . It isn't leveraging IO, Metal GPU, or using video codecs.
Tell me when Shiftscreen can run LumaFusion editing 4k video on an external display while Affinity Photo is juggling a 30 layer 600 MB .psd file. All of which will exert more than 5GB of ram each and go to swap.

And this isn't a pie-in-the-sky use case. Editing images for titles for a 4K social media video is a valid use case for a M1 pro iPad.
A bit wrong there as I was merely pointing to the ability to run fullscreen nothing more nothing less.

I know shiftscreen is a browser. But Citrix and Jump Desktop uses HW acc for remote control.
 
But Citrix and Jump Desktop uses HW acc for remote control.
Again, very lightweight tasks. It is just rendering to a framebuffer and not even 30 fps as it is polling from a remote desktop. Even a 2GB Raspberry PI can do that. An iPhone have been doing that for a few years now.
 
Anyway I have proved ipad pro 2020 which was still in Apple Store in April 2021 has enough cpu, ram, ssd speed to run full ipadOS 16. Apple just use programming to limit "pro updates" to M1 only and the real reason should be because of $$$ more profit.
The RAM on the 2020 iPad Pro is only 6 GB. The minimum RAM in an M1 iPad Pro is 8 GB, with 16 GB in the high-end models. The SSD is much faster in the M1 models.
By asking for Stage Manager on your iPad, you're asking for sucky performance, poor battery life, decreased life expectancy of the SSD, and apps crashing in the middle of your work.
Some people have hearkened back to the days of physical disk drives, to suggest SSD speed doesn't matter, but they forget just how intolerable virtual memory swapping was. And in a battery operated device with the efficiency of an iPad, you do not want to see swapping occur with any regularity.
 
Last edited:
🎻 🎻

I'm not criticising people for being upset: it's the usual MR-style lack of reasoning and critical thinking i.e. the automatic assumption that something Apple does that people don't like / even slightly disadvantages them is being done for malicious commercial reasons / just to spite people. One thing to think about: do you really think that no-one working at Apple will have (or will have family members or friends with) older devices? Why would they want to wreck their own / family / friends experience by deliberately making those devices work worse? Doesn't make sense, but every iOS / macOS / iPadOS update we get "they're deliberately making older devices run slower to make people upgrade".

p.s. the previous-generation iPad Pros were sold up until May 2021, so the youngest of those (unless bought from a reseller after Apple stopped selling them) would be over a year old now. That doesn't meet any reasonable definition of "brand new".


We'll have none of your reasoned argument here! Torch-wielding mobs only!

No where, literally no where did I say it was for "malicious reasons". You claim no one is using their critical thinking skills but it seems like you're the one having issues in that camp.

Apple screwed up, simple as that and those of us who can't use one of the best features of the OS for devices not even a year old have every right to be angry.

If you don't like it, don't bother commenting. Simple.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Loismustdie1
Again, very lightweight tasks. It is just rendering to a framebuffer and not even 30 fps as it is polling from a remote desktop. Even a 2GB Raspberry PI can do that. An iPhone have been doing that for a few years now.
Yes that is exactly why ipad should be able to do it to!!!!

it is still fullscreen, which I was referring to. I never talked multitasking or demanding apps. You are wrong about iPhone the. It still has black bars like ipad.
 
Last edited:
Then TWEAK THE THING until you're satisfied!!!

You roll out a whole bunch of things that stutter, crash, and burst into flames, and now suddenly you care about customer experience?
Ah yes, I definitely remember all the iPhones, iPads, and MacBooks that burst into flames /s

Jesus Christ. I hope all the salty commenters here are able to get the support they need for the debilitating trauma this announcement has caused. Instead of getting a new iPad, might I recommend investing in an emotional support animal?
 
So you look at product specs and believe that More RAM = More Performance, eh? Figured so.

This is not a "tiny new feature". Stage Manager is essentially keeping several apps running in the foreground at once vs. just one at a time as we've always had. This is essentially a multi-foreground feature, supporting up to four foreground apps at a single time, and bringing another four apps "to the stage" instantly requires a lot of fast processing. Not to mention the support for an entire second screen with the same features again.

So no, it's not a tiny new feature. It's a massive new way of interacting with apps.
I won’t buy their explanation that A12X is not performant enough to handle stage manager’s simultaneous multi-window multitasking, when my Windows laptop with i7-7700HQ which is a slower CPU compared to A12X handled much more intense multitasking without breaking a sweat.

Task prioritization has been here since forever, even Windows OS or Windows programs knows to put program’s thread at higher priority when user is actively interacting with the program, and put their thread at lower priority when user isn’t actively interacting.
 
He had clearly explained why full ipadOS 16 can be in older ipads especially pro 2020 and Apple does this should be for $$$.
Seeing the examples of a more limited Stage Manager for use with older recent iPads makes sense. Even if you have place some limits with the model effected, Apple needs to be expanding the Stage Manager usability, instead of producing one coded example that only fits in a specific SoC vs RAM match. Boggles the mind that a A15 could not run Stage Manger floating windows in a limited fashion in place of 2 applications side by side. I really dislike the side by side as it currently implemented, and IPadOS 16 really fails on improving it for non M1 iPads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JKAussieSkater
Ah yes, I definitely remember all the iPhones, iPads, and MacBooks that burst into flames /s

Jesus Christ. I hope all the salty commenters here are able to get the support they need for the debilitating trauma this announcement has caused. Instead of getting a new iPad, might I recommend investing in an emotional support animal?

How can anyone afford an emotional support animal when they have to update their ipad pros every year? :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.