Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Expensive gimmick. Outside of field service as a business application (which Microsoft do a good job of) I can’t see any practical application.
Really? I think it has huge potential eventually if it's priced well and isn't marketed like a gimmick or just for gaming or something. There are very few limitations to the value of this technology over time if well implemented.

Use it on museum tours. Instantly view information about a creator without having to look at your phone. Want to see other work by the same person? Sure. Side by side? You got it. Want to compare a different artist? Sure thing. Maybe you'd like to see the art you're looking at as it was originally displayed when it was created. You can do that too.

Same thing for an archaeological site. Built right, you could view crumbling ruins with an overlay of how they'd have originally appeared - and be able to walk around in them. Or as a tool for modern archaeologists to revisit a dig layer by layer. That could be invaluable to the (inherently destructive) science.

Remodeling your home? Walk around and preview your changes in real time, exactly as they'd appear when completed. Don't like what you see? Change it. Want to buy or build a house? Take a walkthrough without having to travel to it or have it built first.

Use it to make your computer monitor as large or as small as you want for whatever you're doing.

More medical and mental health treatments may be adaptable to the technology (some ar/vr is already used in the medical field, but there's room for expansion). Give a hospital bound person the ability to attend a family function almost as if they were actually there.

Sit in on lectures and labs with top experts in whatever field you want to learn about without the inherent depersonalization of staring at a fixed screen.

Far more realistic technical & engineering training opportunities, the ability to "travel" anywhere in the world and engage in any activity instantly, fitness and sports training, sculpt, re-engineer a part of a machine virtually, situate your product in a home or business. Preview a hike on an unfamiliar trail. Visit and walk around a destination before you arrive. Pick which beach you like best before you go on vacation - by virtually standing on it and taking a look around.

Some of this can already be done in an extremely limited manner on the flat screen of a computer or phone, ar/vr glasses have the potential to take that to a new level. Other things simply can't be replicated on a "flat" device or are extremely awkward or dangerous in ways the ar/vr glasses could help resolve.
 
Well if it's THAT heavy, it better come with a belt. I wasn't thinking of a big block banging against your chest... more like something evenly distributed around your neck that wouldn't swing around. I really wasn't expecting anyone to do a design like this, but it sounds better to me than a waist battery on a long cord.

I just know that wired headphones going to a phone or iPod are pretty annoying, and Apple has moved away from that... so them doing a waist battery just sounds bizarre to me.
You may be right. I guess we will know soon enough.
 
I criticized the first Apple Watch. Years later, I think the Series 7 and 8 are fantastic, it’s now my go-to watch.

Learned my lesson. I’ll hold judgement until they’ve released and updated this headset.
Series 4 was the real breakthrough IMO
I've had series 6 for the last 2 years, apart from always, not that much better, I'm now getting series 8 and sure, it will be better, but series 4 is when the Apple Watch arrived.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
Really? I think it has huge potential eventually if it's priced well and isn't marketed like a gimmick or just for gaming or something. There are very few limitations to the value of this technology over time if well implemented.

Use it on museum tours. Instantly view information about a creator without having to look at your phone. Want to see other work by the same person? Sure. Side by side? You got it. Want to compare a different artist? Sure thing. Maybe you'd like to see the art you're looking at as it was originally displayed when it was created. You can do that too.

Same thing for an archaeological site. Built right, you could view crumbling ruins with an overlay of how they'd have originally appeared - and be able to walk around in them. Or as a tool for modern archaeologists to revisit a dig layer by layer. That could be invaluable to the (inherently destructive) science.

Remodeling your home? Walk around and preview your changes in real time, exactly as they'd appear when completed. Don't like what you see? Change it. Want to buy or build a house? Take a walkthrough without having to travel to it or have it built first.

Use it to make your computer monitor as large or as small as you want for whatever you're doing.

More medical and mental health treatments may be adaptable to the technology (some ar/vr is already used in the medical field, but there's room for expansion). Give a hospital bound person the ability to attend a family function almost as if they were actually there.

Sit in on lectures and labs with top experts in whatever field you want to learn about without the inherent depersonalization of staring at a fixed screen.

Far more realistic technical & engineering training opportunities, the ability to "travel" anywhere in the world and engage in any activity instantly, fitness and sports training, sculpt, re-engineer a part of a machine virtually, situate your product in a home or business. Preview a hike on an unfamiliar trail. Visit and walk around a destination before you arrive. Pick which beach you like best before you go on vacation - by virtually standing on it and taking a look around.

Some of this can already be done in an extremely limited manner on the flat screen of a computer or phone, ar/vr glasses have the potential to take that to a new level. Other things simply can't be replicated on a "flat" device or are extremely awkward or dangerous in ways the ar/vr glasses could help resolve.
Cheap holidays as well 😊
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tdude96
Dear Tim,

I’d like to develop an app for your goggles. I have a great idea but need $$
Call me?
 
I'll believe it when I see it.

Of course using it for the first time can have a "wow" factor; I don't think many people thought the user experience was going to be terrible all around.

But it won't be a success if there aren't any "killer apps". It remains to be seen how useful it actually is. That will determine whether it's worth the price, whether it will truly be "game changer", and whether it could (potentially) replace other products in someone's workflow or daily usage. It can still "blow away" and be a gimmick. Other headsets were received with similar initial fanfare, but little long-term adoption. It has to not be a gimmick to be a success.
 
Apple = no future, unable to make bold decision, unable to look forward, still Mac, iPhones, watches, nothing new. nothing Bold crypto, cars, financial, zero afraid to mess with the status quo, they are going to pay the consequences anyway because the regulator they are already looking at Apple and the investors as a cash cow to milk.
 
  • Disagree
  • Haha
Reactions: mhnd and Tagbert
excited for the next era of Apple
I seriously doubt it will be $3k, my guess is that number was leaked on purpose to make it sound like a bargain at “just $1999”.

Either way, I can’t wait to see it. First gen Apple products may not be the best value, but they’re always beautiful and well built :apple:
People forget that Apple released a personal computer named Lisa one year before the Macintosh. It was $10,000 the equivalent of $30,000 in today’s money. Lisa introduced many of the advancements that went into the Mac. The Mac made them more affordable.
 
Here's a little secret...
You don't have to buy it.
I'm not buying it, most people are not buying it.
Apple knows this, they only expect to sell about a million units in the first full year.
For reference, the iPhone sold its first million units in two and a half months, the iPad took... less than a weekend to sell 3 million.
This is going to be a very low volume product.
Closest thing it can be compared to is like the 2019 Mac Pro, extremely low volume, extremely expensive but has its supporters.
And as stated in the article, smaller lighter cheeper and faster versions in the next 5 years are inevitable.
You'll probably be able to get some form of this product for 1/3 of its original price in two to three years, so...
Sales are literally the least important part of this first generation.
Apple only hoped to sell a million iPhones per year.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.