Of course it does. It could be, just a keyboard, which it isn't.
Can we please not argue over terminology for something like that...
Of course it does. It could be, just a keyboard, which it isn't.
Can we please not argue over terminology for something like that...
I'm sorry? You are the one who objected to what I said, I then went on to explain my position.
Apple HAS BEEN obsessively meticulous in the past, but lately the pattern is exactly the opposite. More and more products with embarrassing issues.
I just don't want to see nitpicking over words that don't matter that much.
Then why did you nitpick over words that don't matter much.![]()
I'm notI don't care if it doubles as this and that or if it was designed to do both or whatever else.
yep, because different colored finishes are true hallmarks of an advance of technology, and what we all have been waiting for...
/s
You don't care? Then why did you post this?
https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/18180976/
This is hilarious simply because you started out by nitpicking, then when I explained myself, you go on to say that you do not want to see any nitpicking. It's hypocritical.
Can you please read my username and the username from that post? They don't match. Aka that's not me...
He (or she) is benji888. I am not.
IMO, this demonstrates Apple's lack of ideas now. Bigger/faster iPhones, smaller iPads, different colors, and now keyboards.
No more "Wow! I never even thought of that before" ideas, which is kind of sad.
Ooo Oooo Oooooo, but I'm waiting for the funky fresh wild gesticulations, twirling, tap dancing, beatboxing, camera angels showing a person writing a checkmark on the screen, and otherwise not saying a damn thing. Because Apple is all about showing how hip hop their iPad is.I'm waiting for those painful 'click' ads from Apple.
But does it click?![]()
and stop yourself appearing like an old fuddy-duddy
Microsoft just built a Smart Cover and slapped a keyboard on it. If apple takes it a step further and adds a new great feature, it's not copying. It's just friendly competition, and without competition, there's no innovation.
Whereas Microsoft markets a keyboard cover, some years after the first keyboard covers hit the market, and that's a 'wow! I never even thought of that' moment?
Apple (nor MSFT, nor Google) has never delivered such 'wow' moments on a regular cycle (despite what fans of each company might try to claim). Those moments are few and far between, for any of them. IMO, you're just holding Apple to a different (higher) set of expectations and standards.
It just said Apple has been considering a keyboard case, not that it was coming out. Apple prototypes many things that never see the light of day.
But if Apple did this I'd bet it would be better than Microsoft's implementation. Apple obsessive iterates before releasing things. They are not perfect but have a much better track record with hardware than anyone else.
Microsoft and Apple are competitors, no doubt, but the fact that they are both (along with Microsoft partner Nokia) two of the most aggressive at IP-related lawsuits against Android OEMs but have entered into a cross-licensing agreement with each other make me think that they both realize that Android is a bigger threat to each of them than each other is. If Surface gains significant market share, it will be at the expense of Android.
As for the Surface keyboard, it is one thing that Microsoft got right. They licensed Apple's Smart Cover and improved upon it. Apple may well have licensed the Surface keyboard with the intent of improving upon it, or they may have had the underlying patents already.
Whereas Microsoft markets a keyboard cover, some years after the first keyboard covers hit the market, and that's a 'wow! I never even thought of that' moment?![]()
Apple ... has never delivered such 'wow' moments on a regular cycle ... IMO, you're just holding Apple to a different (higher) set of expectations and standards.
I meant the years between the timeframes I mentioned. 2001 (iPod), 2007 (iPhone), 2008 (unibody MacBooks), and 2010 (iPad) were innovative. That leaves about 6 years without much innovation. What I'm saying is that people shouldn't expect a revolutionary product every year, and based on rumors, the pipeline looks good.
Nope I'm quite sober thanks. And Apple hasn't invited anything? What are you on about? Mad person.
You must be angry typing with those typos hahahaha.
Ah, I see sorry. So you are some kind of self assigned forum police, the irony of all this however is that we have now spent an entire page on a meta discussion about nitpicking, which you very much is a part of.![]()
So, looking up 'strawman fallacy' on wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man , it appears to me that you were incorrect when you used that term to describe the original comment.
Specifically, to be an example of the strawman fallacy, the author would need to have subverted an earlier proposition, and put forward his own similar proposition ( intending you to believe it the same as the original ) and then proved or refuted some statement about that proposition.
Check out that article, and I think you'll agree that there more to 'attacking the straw man' than just the use of stereotypes and exaggeration ( which is how I'd describe the original comment ).
I think you could have been more understanding, it is clear to me that the original author was expressing his opinion in a fun and enthusiastic manner, he didn't appear to be accusing any one single person of having those traits he despises, but merely annoyed at a attitude that he sees expressed in those mannerisms he describes.
"But if Apple did this I'd bet it would be better than Microsoft's implementation."
So typical - pooh-poohed when Microsoft puts it out BUT deemed brilliant when Apple takes it market.
The fanboyz rhetoric is tiresome, ain't it.