Aww man iMac just got updated not too long ago and they're getting one again? It's no justice to macbooks!
I see a few problems with a touchscreen computer.
1. Valuable screen space would be taken up by the keyboard popping up all the time. So many more spelling mistakes would be made. Also the majority of keyboard users are probably still use to a tactile device and a screen keyboard would lose all that input.
2. If the screen was also to replace the mouse, the mouse pointer is more accurate for certain circumstances such as cad and painting. Your finger does not beat a mouse pointer.
3. The Mac is slowly pushing more into the games market with companies like Steam and Blizzard leading the way. A proper keyboard would be a necessity for this area.
I can see the advantages of going completely touchscreen, but I think it would be better for Apple as a company to develop the iPad down that path. Use it as the guinea pig of future touchscreen technology. If the iPad eventually becomes an iMac then so be it but don't discontinue the current keyboard/mouse layout. It would be technological suicide at this stage.
Bottom line, if Apple releases a iMac that is Touchscreen only with no external keyboard or mouse option, then I guess it will be back to Windows and a PC for me, and I would hate that to happen.
Since I've had a Windows 7 multi-touch laptop for more than a year, I think that the answer is really simple -
most of the time, the touch screen augments the keyboard & mouse - it doesn't replace them
It becomes 2nd nature. If a web page has a "Submit" button, you simply touch it. If there's a text box that needs input - touch the text box, type the data, then touch "submit".
Nothing requires you to use touch, but often touching the screen is faster and more intuitive than moving your hand to the mouse (or touch panel), moving the cursor to the target, then clicking somewhere on something to move focus, then typing.
I see a few problems with a touchscreen computer.
1. Valuable screen space would be taken up by the keyboard popping up all the time. So many more spelling mistakes would be made. Also the majority of keyboard users are probably still use to a tactile device and a screen keyboard would lose all that input.
2. If the screen was also to replace the mouse, the mouse pointer is more accurate for certain circumstances such as cad and painting. Your finger does not beat a mouse pointer.
3. The Mac is slowly pushing more into the games market with companies like Steam and Blizzard leading the way. A proper keyboard would be a necessity for this area.
Bottom line, if Apple releases a iMac that is Touchscreen only with no external keyboard or mouse option, then I guess it will be back to Windows and a PC for me, and I would hate that to happen.
the touchscreen iMac is just an excuse for them to jack prices up and then not have to include a mouse or keyboard with it and then charge extra for those
Attention Complaint
What are wrong with you? One day you will realize yourself that you are foolish and agree that Apple are in right direct.
Think about past in 80's Apple start use Mouse. Most user said, what junk pieces of mouse? when they are use keyboard with fill your memory to remember varies command key.
Now everyone will say that can't imagine how will run computer without mouse. Touchscreen will be huge benefit for everyone. Let think yourself... when you sit on computer and want show your photo album on screen. Your hand point on photo to explain the detail then your band go back on mouse to click for next photo. It will repeat. Or probably easy to do when you point on screen the house, mountain, whatever something on photo and you want zoom in then you do with your two finger, then want o go next photo then your finger move left or right, just same to iphone, ipad. That is amazing thing make life easier.
Another example, you go ATM to withdrawal the cash. Would you do keyword and metal chain link to mouse It will take longer processing to complete. - OR - do on touchscreen and get cash quickly and go.
Again, I don't believe that mouse will be gone anytime. At point that touchscreen will bring bright future such play card game, draw, flip phto, and many more. I strong agree with apple that move brilliant direct.
Christopher Layton
BRICK Marketplace
www.brickmarketplace.com
Yeah, the smudging and (especially) the ergonmics (or lack thereof) is what kills this concept, which doesn't mean that people won't buy just because it's new and they can (e.g., I bought the magic trackpad and have hardly used it since the first day). Imagine dragging a file from the upper left corner of the screen to the trash on a 27" one of these things, and then multiply this kind of motion by 1000 a day![]()
No touchscreens for desktop computers. It's just silly!
Agreed. Its like there's this 'sense' by some people (Steve Jobs?) that there 'must' be somthing better than a mouse, since it was 'invented' 4 decades ago. Thats so OLD. But then, we've been using steering wheels in the cars we drive, and that was a control method designed centuries ago! Its not like we're also sitting here thinking there 'must' be a better, more modern way to control our cars. Why do we insist on thinking that way with our computers. Maybe, just maybe, the mouse IS the best way to do it?
Have you never watched Minority Report or Avatar? Its the future right at your fingertips!![]()
First of all, you're right. Steering wheels have been the standard for over a century in cars, but that's because better technologies weren't yet invented. But they will be.
Second, while we used steering wheels to navigate cars, it took a long time before car manufacturers started thinking to utilize the steering wheel to hold other key functions, such as radio, bluetooth and cruise control buttons.
So, you're the kind of guy who believes we can reinvent the wheel into something better ?
Sometimes, things are just right from the get go. There's no reason to mess with a good thing.
Those don't "use the steering wheel". There's no steering gestures. They are just conveniently placed under your thumb rather than on the console. You make it sound like it's such a big revolution, when in fact it's just a side effect of the safety moms "don't take your hands off the wheel!" lobbies.
I see a few problems with a touchscreen computer.
1. Valuable screen space would be taken up by the keyboard popping up all the time. So many more spelling mistakes would be made. Also the majority of keyboard users are probably still use to a tactile device and a screen keyboard would lose all that input.
2. If the screen was also to replace the mouse, the mouse pointer is more accurate for certain circumstances such as cad and painting. Your finger does not beat a mouse pointer.
3. The Mac is slowly pushing more into the games market with companies like Steam and Blizzard leading the way. A proper keyboard would be a necessity for this area.
I can see the advantages of going completely touchscreen, but I think it would be better for Apple as a company to develop the iPad down that path. Use it as the guinea pig of future touchscreen technology. If the iPad eventually becomes an iMac then so be it but don't discontinue the current keyboard/mouse layout. It would be technological suicide at this stage.
Bottom line, if Apple releases a iMac that is Touchscreen only with no external keyboard or mouse option, then I guess it will be back to Windows and a PC for me, and I would hate that to happen.
Aww man iMac just got updated not too long ago and they're getting one again? It's no justice to macbooks!
Because, for starters, I can move a cursor across two displays by moving a mouse by an inch or two while my arms are supported on a desk... for many hours on end. The mouse, trackball, touchpad are levers of sorts.
I wouldn't necessarily oppose touchscreen Macs. I just fail to see how they would be easy to use for a day of work as they're currently proposed.
I don't think that Apple would introduce a mac that is touchscreen only - not only would it make no sense, but - as is clearly illustrated in the patent - there would be no need for the articulated stand affording two viewing positions. Apple had a keyboard for the iPad at launch, there's no way they wouldn't do the same with a touch screen mac.
It's not about an all or nothing approach, and that's where many critics of this idea fall down in their criticism.
So it's a good thing to spin an analog device around three times in order to back into a parking space? Your shortsightedness is nothing if not consistent.
There are already cars on the market that will park themselves. The "good thing" that you are so fond of will someday be replaced.
It wasn't a revolution. It was an evolution. My point was just to illustrate that thinking out of the box sometimes evolves technology. At other times it launches it forward at light speed. You're likely too young to remember when headlight dimmer switches were on the floor of the car. Now they all reside on the steering column. Technology changes
I dream of the day that my keyboard is a second, touch-enabled display that has the ability to redraw itself for different input modes.