Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
At the risk of this becoming political, the country is very stable outside of those two area and arguably relatively stable in those areas when you look over the last 100 years!


It's odd considering Israel's only 63 years old. Last I checked they became a statehood in May of 1948. Regardless, you can't argue that rockets flying into public transportation and all the other jewish/arab conflict tension doesn't exist, because it does and will continue to do so, unless both sides TRY to make an attempt to solve the problem.
 
I wonder when Apple will start offering its first laptop powered by the A-chip.

At some point I think it will start to happen. Just as when the PowerPC chip was replaced with Intel.

There is no reason why the Atom could not blow the gates off of the x86 if it was scaled to a VLIW architecture. You would lose all the power savings you get from the current architecture and you would need to code for explicitly parallel execution, however, I could see an easy x10 performance over x86. It would require someone like Intel or AMD to do the heavy lifting for the chip design.
 
This sounds so cool. I hope there is some software development in that center, then I would really want to move there.

Israel is a great place for start-ups, a great place for technology, and just a great place to live in.

Oded, Israel

Really, I have visited the Holy Land a few years ago, the news frontlines constantly rattle about how many bombings and people killed, which shopping center had an explosion. And armed snipers walking around is a norm. Where do you live that you call it safe :rolleyes:
 
What's interesting is there is more corporate blast back for locating in North Carolina or Israel, than Brazil or China.

If Russia ever gets a legitimate rule of law, look for Apple to move in fast.

In the mean time this is in a well developed industrial and intellectual area and just happens to be in the center of "Arabia". A true destination for many persons worldwide, second only to Mecca.

Hmmm. Apple store Mecca. It could happen! :D

Rocketman
 
Point of order: Is it acceptable to bring up points as to how politics relate to Apple business? I am not talking about taking a pro or con taking sides, just, "What happens if..." kind of stuff?

Edited to say, Donald Duck for president! :)

I think it's okay if it's related to Apple (e.g. What would happen to Apple's plant in case of war, i.e. how safe is the location etc - but the discussion should stay in that and not move to the actual war). However, posts that are only political (e.g. all these how Israel doesn't follow the human rights etc.) are not tolerated.
 
If Russia ever gets a legitimate rule of law, look for Apple to move in fast.
All the smart Russians have already moved to Israel (possibly the first time in history that people have pretended to be Jewish to escape persecution).
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

kps said:
Glad to know that Apple is investing in such a safe, stable part of the world.
Next thing you know they'll be building their head office on a major fault line.

And building it out of mainly glass!
 
Thrilled to hear Apple is getting on the Israeli bandwagon. Many hi-tech companies have offices in Israel and it is often referred to as the "Start Up Nation."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What will happen when Israel responds to Iran testing a nuke? how will the surrounding Islamic countries react to Israel's actions? What part of the country would make a good economic target? I am sure it would be a part with links to the United States.

War is never a good thing, and Israel is closer than they have been in many years.

The immediate concern isn't so much Iran testing a nuke as Israel deciding that they have a limited window to hit Iran before Iran's nuclear program becomes so advanced that Israel won't be able to stop it. The US really doesn't want Israel hitting Iran and Israel knows that there will be a huge price if they do, but let's suppose that this would actually happen. Then what?

Iran has very limited direct means of striking Israel. What they can do is they can get Hezbollah to create chaos in the north of Israel. If that happens, Israel will strike Iran from the ground and from the air and Hezbollah will launch a ton of rockets at Israeli cities and possibly strike Israeli or Jewish targets abroad. There may also be major problems for the US and its allies in the Persian Gulf (mass demonstrations in Bahrain, violence in Iraq, possibly naval confrontations in the Gulf itself) but we'll set that aside. Ultimately what will happen is that there will be a limited period of violence between Israel and Hezbollah which will result in significant casualties - most of which will be in Lebanon. But this conflict won't last long - maybe a month - before (a) Hezbollah's capacity to hit Israeli population centers is taken out or (b) the international community stops the fighting. The US will prevent the international community from stopping the conflict for as long as it can so that Israel can do as much damage to Hezbollah's infrastructure as possible, but a conventional conflict won't go on very long. There is very likely to be an uprising in Gaza, and Hamas will use the opportunity to do what damage it can, but ultimately Hamas can't really do that much outside of making life in Ashkelon and Sderot miserable. The West Bank is likely to stay quiet. Fatah and the Palestinian Authority have too much to lose from full-scale conflict with Israel. That means that the kind of suicide bombing against Israeli cities that we saw during the second intifada (bus bombings, that sort of thing) probably won't happen.

So let's say that all of this happens. Worst comes to worst much of the country shuts down for a month and then things get back to normal. If you're building an R&D center its a problem but it isn't the kind of fear that makes you close up shop.
 
I get the tech reasons for opening the R&D center. I'm just curious why Apple hasn't already established a presence in the country- there's no iTunes store or official Apple retail presence. The only ways to get your Apple products repaired in Israel are through authorized 3rd parties. Because of this, very very few people in Israel use Apple products.
 
Are they trying to get huge damage claims once this thing is swallowed by "random" attack from nearby communities?
Nothing against Israel but that is one damn weird place to build. And have been there twice. Nice place overall just not what you can call stable.
 
a Very smart move, Apple will just achieve from that better knowledge. and I don't see really how politices and war is related here. Israel is way more safe than NYC in my opinion, and you don't always have to listen to what you hear on the news.
 
I wonder how many of those making politicized posts actually know that a fairly decent portion of technological achievements (including Intel's Core Duo and Sandy-Bridge architectures) was developed in Israel.
-that Israel is among the top countries in the world in areas of Natural sciences, Engineering, Medicine and Research
-that it has one of the highest percentages of scientists and of registered patents per capita in the world
-that it is consistently ranked as one of the most innovative countries in the world
-that its universities and research institutions are consistently ranked among the top in the world


World Economic Forum said:
[Israel]’s main strengths remain its world-class capacity for innovation (6th), which rests on highly innovative businesses that benefit from the presence of the world’s best research institutions, geared toward the needs of the business sector. The excellent innovation capacity.. ..is reflected in the country’s high number of patents (4th). Its favorable financial environment (10th), particularly the solid availability of venture capital (2nd), has further contributed to making Israel an innovation powerhouse...
WEF Global competitiveness report 2011-2012

I, personally, think it'll be enormously beneficial to Apple to have an R&D center there and I hope it'll help them innovate in microprocessor space.
 
A friend of mine who is a VP at IBM was freaking out a few years ago during the last lebanon conflict. Apparently 80% of their R&D capacity was shut down.

That being said, he also credits the israeli R&D facilities with nearly all recent tech innovations, and says that if a company wants to remain competitive, they have to bite the (mostly metaphorical) bullet, and take the risk. There is no more innovative place than Israel.
 
I utterly agree with you

Very dissapointing if true. Not gonna say I'll boycott Apple if this happens (I won't) but I'd feel much less enthusiastic about my purchases. I'd prefer large companies not directly support and build facilities in countries actively occupying, oppressing, and committing grotesque human rights abuses towards millions of people, therefore legitimizing this criminal behavior.

I think my current apple gear might be the last from apple:(
 
Im not sure if apple should develop anything in Israel based off the conflicts in that area, I'm just thinking that even though that company is based there moving the company and building a center in a country with less tensions might be a better idea.

Like Korea maybe? ;)
 
Good. Loss of habitat is the #1 most destructive force in our country.

Much rather they tear up someone else's countryside instead.

See? There's an upside to everything.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

Send US jobs to Israel. Cool.

It makes sense, our tax dollars already go there, why not our jobs too.
 
Very dissapointing if true. Not gonna say I'll boycott Apple if this happens (I won't) but I'd feel much less enthusiastic about my purchases. I'd prefer large companies not directly support and build facilities in countries actively occupying, oppressing, and committing grotesque human rights abuses towards millions of people, therefore legitimizing this criminal behavior.

Seriously? Why was this post voted down? Any of the downvoters care to shed some light?
 
What happens if total warfare with the surrounding countries breaks out? It's not like it has not happened before, It's not like tensions are not currently at an all time high.

What will they do when Iran tests it's first nuclear bomb? What will the surrounding countries do in retaliation?

First point: It's unlikely that total warfare will break out again. It's been proven that insurgent forces are able to tie Israel down much more ably with greater human cost. Jordan and Egypt have peace agreements, and Syria/Lebanon have their own troubles at the moment.

If Iran tests their bomb, we'll have more than just Apple to worry about. I put my faith into the Mossad, though...


It's odd considering Israel's only 63 years old. Last I checked they became a statehood in May of 1948.
That's true, but I was looking further than just the past 63 years. Instability is pretty much that region of the world's namesake. Look at the Arab riots in the early thirties, or the British mandates in the early 1900s, or the Ottoman Empire's total lack of control for a hundred years before that...
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

Great move. Israel has a very deep talent pool and an excellent innovative track record in high tech (among other things). Good things will come of this.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.