They do care, because they all pay $99 per year to stay in the App Store.
or maybe the developer is busy writing so many other apps, he or she can't get to their own? Stop complaining. You probably know nothing about software development.Good. Apps that haven't been updated in years should no longer be on the App Store. It's obvious the developer doesn't care about the app anymore.
I don't really know what you mean.MR: where the user base hits 15 and stays there.
Apps only need to support the last two iOS releases which will soon be iOS9 and iOS10, so I would say two years.If an app hasn't been updated for a year, it needs to go. That would clear out a sh*t ton of useless crap.
agreed. there is a huge amount of effort involved in building apps.They do care, because they all pay $99 per year to stay in the App Store.
They should also immediately remove all apps that are web wrappers. Particularlly prevalent for forum apps.
This was inevitable because there is no way to charge for updates. Also, developers have been pulling apps because they don't make money and support costs are too expensive. Apple needs to open up the platform so developers can sell directly to customers using whatever business model makes sense for their products. They of course can keep their own App Store but iOS device owners could then have the choice to buy elsewhere - this would be proper competition.
.. but this puts Apple on thin ice because there hasn't been a way update apps for older devices e.g. iPhone 3G and 3Gs etc...due to minimum system support in Xcode. This has been blatant anti-trust. Why does Apple have the right to declare an old device useless and prevent supporting apps on them? Does Chevrolet or Ford have the right to prevent old car model owners from keeping their cars on the road?
It's as good as it can be without human curation or some kickass machine learning.And fix search while you're there Apple!
They do care, because they all pay $99 per year to stay in the App Store.
.. but this puts Apple on thin ice because there hasn't been a way update apps for older devices e.g. iPhone 3G and 3Gs etc...due to minimum system support in Xcode. This has been blatant anti-trust. Why does Apple have the right to declare an old device useless and prevent supporting apps on them? Does Chevrolet or Ford have the right to prevent old car model owners from keeping their cars on the road?
or maybe the developer is busy writing so many other apps, he or she can't get to their own? Stop complaining. You probably know nothing about software development.
I didn't want to justify those old apps because their developers pay the fees every year, but a developer that really doesn't care about their apps anymore doesn't pay these fees. That's what I wanted to say with that. It is absolutely justified and about time to delete those old and abandoned apps if they are not compatible with any current iOS or device.
There is a *lot* of abandonware out there. Good to see Apple doing something about that.