Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This will be a windfall for my consulting business. I've developed several apps for companies that never bothered to update them - but will now be forced to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macsba
They do care, because they all pay $99 per year to stay in the App Store.

I wouldn't bet on that.
Some apps hasn't been updated in 3 to 4 years.
Many are so outdated that they aren't compatible with the present iOS and crashes.
Many of those app aren't even free. The dev took the money and ran.
 
Good. Apps that haven't been updated in years should no longer be on the App Store. It's obvious the developer doesn't care about the app anymore.
or maybe the developer is busy writing so many other apps, he or she can't get to their own? Stop complaining. You probably know nothing about software development.
 
Translation: All 32 bit apps will be deleted from the store and from the user purchases and the app store will be like the Apple Store app and no longer work with iOS 8 and earlier but require iOS9 64 bit devices from now on. AKA Must purchase new iPhone. (They will say that the user must maintain their own copy of apps that were purchased from now on.)
 
I'm just waiting for the update that keeps me from running apps that I purchased but are outdated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adam9c1
No No No.
Don't remove aps.

FIX the search.

Don't show me 30 games but no IT related apps.

Help me search through previous purchases and put them in categories.
 
They should also immediately remove all apps that are web wrappers. Particularlly prevalent for forum apps.

You don't have to download or use any app you don't like. For many sites these web wrapper apps offer better usability than the actual site. I don't see any reason they can't stay as MANY find them useful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kiro
Wow this is just what the indie Devs needed. I've been asking for these two things for years and years on these forums and other Dev forums. This might save the indie Dev (not that there are many left). Wow thank you apple!!!!
 
.. but this puts Apple on thin ice because there hasn't been a way update apps for older devices e.g. iPhone 3G and 3Gs etc...due to minimum system support in Xcode. This has been blatant anti-trust. Why does Apple have the right to declare an old device useless and prevent supporting apps on them? Does Chevrolet or Ford have the right to prevent old car model owners from keeping their cars on the road?
 
This was inevitable because there is no way to charge for updates. Also, developers have been pulling apps because they don't make money and support costs are too expensive. Apple needs to open up the platform so developers can sell directly to customers using whatever business model makes sense for their products. They of course can keep their own App Store but iOS device owners could then have the choice to buy elsewhere - this would be proper competition.

Hahahahahahah! Never going to happen. The current model makes Apple far too much money. It also keeps iOS from being filled with exploits that Android has to constantly deal with. In addition, it makes the app store experience far easier for users as there is just a single market place to get apps and stay up to date.
 
There goes all those apps called "Pull my finger" & "Flappy Bird" and all those flashlight and compass apps.
I wonder if they will pull any apps that compete with their own apps like browsers and word processors?
 
.. but this puts Apple on thin ice because there hasn't been a way update apps for older devices e.g. iPhone 3G and 3Gs etc...due to minimum system support in Xcode. This has been blatant anti-trust. Why does Apple have the right to declare an old device useless and prevent supporting apps on them? Does Chevrolet or Ford have the right to prevent old car model owners from keeping their cars on the road?

Your comparison makes no sense and it's in no way an anti-trust violation.

There are very few 3G and 3GS devices still in use and even fewer developers interested in keeping their software alive on them. You can't be using an electronic device that's almost 10 years old and expect current support for it. That's just silly.
 
I'm just wondering how this will affect outdated apps u've purchased... I'm guess they'll be removed from purchase list..

I'd like to know how far back Apple will go with the term "outdated" apps exactly, and while u could say non-functional,, that may not apply to everyone..... as it would vary from iOS versions...

Comments.. just because an app has 0 comments doesn't mean it should be removed.. I wonder how far Apple will go with all of this,.

Can see this a good idea, but just one way i see Apple is forcing everyone to stay "almost up to date"

Many users would still have 3Gs's out there for instance... so they would feel the pain if they can longer download that app they purchased while it was on the app store.
 
.. but this puts Apple on thin ice because there hasn't been a way update apps for older devices e.g. iPhone 3G and 3Gs etc...due to minimum system support in Xcode. This has been blatant anti-trust. Why does Apple have the right to declare an old device useless and prevent supporting apps on them? Does Chevrolet or Ford have the right to prevent old car model owners from keeping their cars on the road?

False equivalency. As those devices gets older and Apple no longer supports them and - more importantly - the apps aren't being updated because they don't work with the latest OS, it is irresponsible of Apple to keep them available for purchase and download. They are likely to get complaints, especially when people with older devices shell out money, only to find out later that they just won't work on their older IOS devices.

Apple has every right - and I would suggest a responsibility - to get rid of them so people don't get burned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: M. Gustave
I didn't want to justify those old apps because their developers pay the fees every year, but a developer that really doesn't care about their apps anymore doesn't pay these fees. That's what I wanted to say with that. It is absolutely justified and about time to delete those old and abandoned apps if they are not compatible with any current iOS or device.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wolfshades
or maybe the developer is busy writing so many other apps, he or she can't get to their own? Stop complaining. You probably know nothing about software development.

If the developer not going to support an old app it should not be on app store.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wolfshades
On the most part, this is good news. However, some older apps have certain functionality that can't be found in other apps. I guess if something hasn't been updated since 2010, I get it, but if it's only a few years old and with no developer love, it still may be useful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tooloud10
I didn't want to justify those old apps because their developers pay the fees every year, but a developer that really doesn't care about their apps anymore doesn't pay these fees. That's what I wanted to say with that. It is absolutely justified and about time to delete those old and abandoned apps if they are not compatible with any current iOS or device.

It would be easier if a developer could delete the apps themselves or remove them from sale. I would love to delete apps that I have not been able to update in years rather than wait for Apple to do so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wolfshades
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.