Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This rumor could support the rumor of an iPad 2 with a Retina Display in September.

The September event could show the iPad 2 RD, an Apple TV 3 with 1080p (or a software update that unlocks 1080p functionality in the Apple TV 2) and 1080p rentals and purchases in iTunes.

My thoughts exactly. I can see Apple wanting to have everything HD capable in the fall. The iPad HD might be pricey, but it will deliver.

Funny though, I don't care much about HD movies but a double resolution iPad would be killer for my job.
 
You must enjoy speaking for other people. My 93" screen and 6.1 channel home-theater disagree with you. I don't want a disc format. If I use Blu-Ray at all, it's to convert it to a streaming format I can use off a menu-driven playback device and server storage system.


I prefer Blu-Ray on my 92" screen/6.1 channel system. Of course, you beat me by an inch, so maybe you're right. :)
 
This rumor could support the rumor of an iPad 2 with a Retina Display in September.

The September event could show the iPad 2 RD, an Apple TV 3 with 1080p (or a software update that unlocks 1080p functionality in the Apple TV 2) and 1080p rentals and purchases in iTunes.

knowing Apple it will require an Apple TV 3. I mean they can not just let people's older hardware get a real upgrade now can they. They want you to drop another 100.

The HD+ naming crap is well crap. 1080p is still HD. it is not HD+ It is just HD. HD+ to me is something greater than 1080p I figure at some point in the future we will be using it but sorry 1080p is not HD+
 
I DO want to nitpick. They said "three of the five LARGEST studios" (emphasis added), NOT "Major".

So your comment is irrelevant. The five largest studios are the five largest studios, it doesn't matter who is sixth.

They were paraphrasing AppleInsider:
...20th Century Fox was said to have arrived with encoding options for SD (480p), HD (720p), and a new, third format listed as HD+ (1080p). Similarly, a small number of upcoming releases from two of the other 'big 5' movie studios were submitted...

And the term "big 5" is incorrect. I am certain they meant the six majors.
 
It's not HD+. 1080P has been part of the HD standard for over a decade. Don't make it look like you're lagging digital content is somehow now better, you've only just now caught up to the competition.

What competition? Amazon has very few instant videos in HD and they are not 1080p, Google? Really you think they are stream movies in 1080p? I can't find anything other then SD on Youtube/movies (I checked all 6 movies Amazon has in HD and Youtube only offers them in "480".)

So, tell me, what competition are they catching up to?
 
...

knowing Apple it will require an Apple TV 3. I mean they can not just let people's older hardware get a real upgrade now can they. They want you to drop another 100.

The HD+ naming crap is well crap. 1080p is still HD. it is not HD+ It is just HD. HD+ to me is something greater than 1080p I figure at some point in the future we will be using it but sorry 1080p is not HD+

Is this "+" meaning, one of those marketing things so it only "sounds" like it's better than it actually is, or leaves question marks open for the future.?
 
Is this "+" meaning, one of those marketing things so it only "sounds" like it's better than it actually is?

oh I know the plus is from the dumb ass in marketing but does not change the fact that it is crap.

Marketing is the same reason we have fake G from T-Mobile and AT&T right now.
The only 2 companies that currently have a 4G network up and running in the US is Verizon and Sprint. AT&T and T-mobile run fake G.
 
If anything, HD+ should be 1440p. I hate when Apple tricks the public with terms like this. 1080p is nothing new or special.
 
Since TV is not my penis extension to the internet i'm happy with 720p downloads from iTunes. I'm not gay for inches and bitrates. DVD quality and up is fine by me as long as content itself is worth watching.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)

For iPad HD and Apple TV 3!
 
Unless these videos are encoded properly it's worthless.

Besides that, the prices on iTunes remain obscene.

Downloads should be much cheaper than discs.

But e-books follow the same logic: maintain a high price point, no matter what the per unit production and distribution cost is.
 
So basically, it looks like Apple are going to finally catch up with everyone else and attempt to tout it as the new innovative best thing since sliced bread. Sounds like something they like to do a lot. E.g 64-bit Snow Leopard.
 
What competition? Amazon has very few instant videos in HD and they are not 1080p, Google? Really you think they are stream movies in 1080p? I can't find anything other then SD on Youtube/movies (I checked all 6 movies Amazon has in HD and Youtube only offers them in "480".)

So, tell me, what competition are they catching up to?

So, as someone who either hasn't read the aforementioned posts or suffers from reading comprehension...

maybe this post about Zune Marketplace instant on 1080p streaming helps you understand
 
And where would this "competition" be that streams movies at 1080P through an online service that has the same library selection that iTunes does? (Hint: Vudu doesn't come close in terms of selection).

Its amazing how many negative people just crawl out of the woodwork anytime something new and interesting is announced.

Did you ever think maybe its not Apples choice? Perhaps its the IP holders who make the rules?

Who said Apple will offer all their movies in 1080p? Like the article says:

But that could begin to change later this year, as a handful of feature films being submitted to the iTunes store for a release in the September and October timeframe are being sent with documentation for an optional 1920x1080 resolution, according to people familiar with the matter.

That pretty much indicates that Apple's lineup of 1080p movies will be very limited, making them not any different from their competitors (apart from joining the game later).

What competition? Amazon has very few instant videos in HD and they are not 1080p, Google? Really you think they are stream movies in 1080p? I can't find anything other then SD on Youtube/movies (I checked all 6 movies Amazon has in HD and Youtube only offers them in "480".)

So, tell me, what competition are they catching up to?

VUDU for instance.
 
So I'm guessing they could use the new Time Capsule for buffering the iTunes movies, along with iCloud backups?
 
Wirelessly posted (Johnny iphone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8G4 Safari/6533.18.5)

Finally- and rofl at all the bluray sceptics who claimed there was virtually no difference between 720 vs 1080p! Even on a 55LED.

What I want now is for my TC to be able to stream my movies to an apple TV with 1080p vids without my mac.
 
Finally- and rofl at all the bluray sceptics who claimed there was virtually no difference between 720 vs 1080p! Even on a 55LED.

That would be funny if someone wenth through and pulled the skeptics and compared before and after comments.

TS3 dvd vs blu-ray is a world apart.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.