Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Maybe. Do Humanities students and people who run Office care?

As a lawyer who runs Office day in and day out, I am highly offended.

But then again, this is coming from someone who up until recently had a 2014 MacBook Air that ran this high-end track-changes Word workflow beautifully.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thewap
they have been thinking really hard how to increase the current reasonable Mac Mini price - a silly "Pro" moniker should achieve that goal. Even the latest MBP definitely doesn't deserver "Pro" moniker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Todhunter
so i'll jump into the speculation train...

im guessing those new mac mini's will essentially be macbook pros in a new shell. the 'pro' segment will be nothing more than available external expansion (external gpu's, drives, etc).

if they were smart, theyd find a way to cram a desktop i5 or i7 into that box, offer user upgradeable memory and a pcie ssd. i doubt they will, as they have long since left the 'user upgradeable' market for NO reason other than to line their pockets.

i'll definitely be interested in what they come up with. i could use a new one around here.
 
they have been thinking really hard how to increase the current reasonable Mac Mini price - a silly "Pro" moniker should achieve that goal. Even the latest MBP definitely doesn't deserver "Pro" moniker.

Here comes the "MacBook Pro is not for Pros" song. Brought to you by the PlayStation 4 Pro and Nike Pro leggings.
[doublepost=1534806157][/doublepost]
so i'll jump into the speculation train...

im guessing those new mac mini's will essentially be macbook pros in a new shell. the 'pro' segment will be nothing more than available external expansion (external gpu's, drives, etc).

if they were smart, theyd find a way to cram a desktop i5 or i7 into that box, offer user upgradeable memory and a pcie ssd. i doubt they will, as they have long since left the 'user upgradeable' market for NO reason other than to line their pockets.

i'll definitely be interested in what they come up with. i could use a new one around here.

You take that little box, throw whatever Coffee Lake is around, change the case a little bit so people know it's new, ???, profit. It amazes me that they haven't done it sooner.
 
Think a Retina MacBook that is low performance but has a fan, so people can do actual sustained work/ Watch Netflix on it.

Then think it will have basic graphics and performance so Apple can still charge you $1299 for the nTB MBP.

Positive note - I think that this is the notebook that will make USB-C go mainstream.


Wait, what? So I can't watch Netflix on my 2016 12" MacBook now?

News to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brendu
I had this crazy theory that what Apple meant by modular for the Mac Pro was starting off with a Mac Mini-like base. I wonder if this is what that is or something else entirely. Basically you would have a base "box" which is the processor, RAM, and logic board. It would have Intel integrated graphics and an small SSD blade so it could run on it's own. Then you can stack components on top of this: GPU(s), SSDs, HDDs, capture cards and similar components for both video/audio production. It could all connect with a series of Thunderbolt 4 connectors (perhaps a variant that allows the components to stack together like lego bricks. The thing I'm not sure about is how the power supply would work, such as needing a larger one with multiple GPUs. I'm also not sure about whether Thunderbolt 4 would be fast enough for professional, highest-end GPU work. Isn't it supposed to be around 100Gbps? Perhaps the reason it has taken this long is they've been working with Intel on that standard (or building their own?).

It could start with a six core processor and 256GB or maybe 512GB SSD and you built it up from there. Starting at $1499. Add on bits as you like. I'm also not sure if they would allow CPU upgrades. Surely a modular machine would have a RAM access door.

I was thinking the same thing! I was hoping more for a Intel NUC unit. I’m really not into LEGO blocks if that’s the direction for a workstation.

I guess we’ll need to wait.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macduke
Except most of those iPhone models are just leaving a previous years model in the lineup to meet various price points. I think the 8 and 8 Plus exist because Apple couldn’t make enough OLED/Face ID models. My guess is this year there is no new iPhone with Touch ID.
iPhone SE - smallest and cheapest, but older tech and still no 3D Touch and Touch ID instead of Face ID; iPhone 9 - larger but worse screen than the iPhone X (second gen), different color options, lower price; Phone X (2nd generation) - smaller but better screen than the iPhone 9, different color options, higher price; iPhone X Plus - bigger screen than the iPhone 9, same color options as the iPhone X (2nd generation), higher price. And to confuse you even further, maybe you'd like a cheaper but older iPhone 7, iPhone 7 Plus, iPhone 8, or iPhone 8 Plus instead - just get used to Touch ID instead of Face ID.

That honestly doesn't seem much better to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Todhunter
So the Mini won't be a consumer model anymore? That would suck!
They can add a Pro model, which would be great, but they need to keep the lower priced units otherwise sayonara Apple for me
 
  • Like
Reactions: nt5672
Just curious. What do you guys using the Mac mini for?

I use mine for home theater. I have it hooked to my home theater receiver through HDMI. I listen to music through it and also watch movies and other shows through Plex. I guess you can say I could use Apple TV for that but the Mac Mini gives me a little bit more flexibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nt5672
Finally a pro focused Mac Mini. I hope that means a dedicated GPU. Please don't make it palm-sized or super-thin at the cost of terrible heat performance. In a desktop machine, performance should be prioritized over thinness. It's going to be portable in a backpack either way.

I really don't see the point in putting a dedicated GPU in a Mac Mini enclosure. Shoving high powered (non-upgradeable) GPU soldered to the logic board is just going to exacerbate the heat problems, and lead to the thermal throttling we've already seen in the MacBook Pro lineup. The Mac Mini is ripe for pairing with an eGPU, since it needs hooking up to an external display anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: frou and nt5672
At Apple, everything i$ pro now!

$pecialized model$ with low entry $pec$ to force our customer$ to $pend money on upgrade$ and to lock them into our $ervices revenue

tim-cook-arms-event.png
 
The original Mac Mini's purpose was to bring Windows users into the fold. They really don't need to that these days. If the Mac Mini will be more of a "pro" device then what markets are trying to entice? They have the Macbook Pro and the iMac/iMac Pro. Where would a higher spec Mac Mini fit in?

I always wanted a headless iMac spec device which I could hook up my own monitor. I doubt Apple wants to have a device for the small minority I'm in. I wonder who the new Mac Mini will be targetted towards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Todhunter
The original Mac Mini's purpose was to bring Windows users into the fold. They really don't need to that these days. If the Mac Mini will be more of a "pro" device then what markets are trying to entice? They have the Macbook Pro and the iMac/iMac Pro. Where would a higher spec Mac Mini fit in?

I always wanted a headless iMac spec device which I could hook up my own monitor. I doubt Apple wants to have a device for the small minority I'm in. I wonder who the new Mac Mini will be targetted towards.

I see a corporate market for these Mac Minis - i.e. regular office stuff not requiring an iMac.
 
The poor Mac mini everyone wants to talk about it BUT Apple. We will probably get an updated 2018 Mac Mini with 3 yr old technology inside. Lol
 
Keep in mind that the spectacular "El Capitan" G3 and G4 Towers, plus the Cheese Grater G5 and Mac Pro Towers were designed by Jony Ive, too...

Back in the Gx days, he had some guidance, not so much these days. Recent Mac Pro's don't get me started, I can sure afford them, but there is no logical reason to pay that much for the given performance unless your company mandates it.
 
I better check my sources. I thought Apple and Intel still had control over qualifying Thunderbolt 3 devices before sale to make sure they met compatibility.

Intel announced last year that they were going to release the Thunderbolt protocol under a nonexclusive, royalty-free license - https://newsroom.intel.com/editorials/envision-world-thunderbolt-3-everywhere/ - but I have yet to see a press release announcing that it has been published and where developers can go to sign up. I do not trust Intel to follow through on this one at all. Not with AMD breathing down their neck, CPU-wise. They have 3 more months, so they aren't liars yet.

Intel was supposed to be at 10nm two years ago, now we're looking at Q3 or Q4 of 2019, so I will stick with 2020 at the absolute earliest for this to happen, if ever. Once I see it in the ARK - https://ark.intel.com - I'll believe it happened.
in my office one staff using acer with usb c bu think it's usb 3.1 gen 1 not gen 2. I read somewhere in web saying
"So i checked the specs and i find that this laptop has a USB 3.1 (Type-C) port, and it is a USB 3.1 Gen1 port, which means this port can transfer data up to 5Gbps. But a USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C port will not support video out. If you want to use our product(USB-C to Hdmi Adapter) you will need a USB 3.1 Gen2Type-C port or a thunderbolt3 port to get video out."

My Imac 2017 connected to hdmi monitor via usb-c.Never think it all about gen2. But my startup external hardisk western digital is usb 3.1gen2
 
HTPC - if a new Mac mini isn’t released, I’ll be endeavoring to move out of the Mac ecosystem.
I use mine for the same thing, except I swapped the HDD for SSD, New Ram, New Fan. It basically runs good enough for my needs, but I can't do much outside of steaming 1080p. I might be picking up the new mini if it remains in a reasonable price point.

Edit: Meant to add If the new one comes with no way of replacing parts or the ram is soldered, it's a hard skip for me. I will basically take it as apple flipping me off.
 
If the Mini-Pro has some level of user-serviceable acess to drives and memory I'm all for it.

I would also take the guts of an iMac Pro sans the cost of the monitor. I have monitors a plenty and if would be far better deskspace wise in my Windows developing (Mac porting) buisness.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.