Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Any post is worthy of a downvote. Welcome to real life, where people are allowed to disagree with you AND they are allowed to express their disagreement with you.

It's not your decision. Apple has reporting requirements. And they actually MUST do right by the investors. By law, they must do the right thing for their investors.

Spending other people's money without their permission is actually THEFT. Don't do that.

Being from NL, you don't seem to know what a share buyback is. It is a legitimate business decision, and the best investments often buy back shares.

Eventually, it will be disclosed in Apple's corporate filings. But announcing it publicly could actually get them in trouble with the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission).

You don't know if that's true or not. Reality is different than your imagination. It's a lot more likely that Apple's legal counsel has counseled on this. For all you know, this kind of thing has to follow a corporate policy and procedure.

Announcing a figure that is seen as too high; that could cause a stock crash.

Also, Apple is due to report quarterly earnings in 21 days. It's possible that an announcement of any amount right now would confuse the public and the stock market.

There are probably a hundred good reasons for not announcing an amount, either at this time or ever.

Anybody can say what they believe. It's kind of rude to play "gatekeeper" and insist that somebody who just has an opinion needs to follow some form of penance or do some kind of "thing" to earn your approval for their opinion to be valid.

Now if you go after him on his failure of facts, that's different. I'll support you all day long if you can find a factual wrong thing he said, or if you can show that he's being hypocritical or encouraging a crime.

I've already covered this. There could be lots of reasons a company might not disclose "commitment levels". One of those reasons is that stockholders like me might not think it's fair for the company to make ANY commitment while constantly raising prices for their products and services.

As an investor, I have expectations that Apple would always do the right thing for apple, for its shareholders, and for its customers. If I disagree with donating to California relief efforts, then Apple is doing it without my consent.

Distasteful? You're not even from here. You probably don't even own any stock in the company. You wouldn't even have any standing to complain to the authorities about any company publicly traded on any of the US stock exchanges.

As I've said above, Apple does need to disclose. They just need to do it in the proper way and in the proper time. They are probably following their own legal team's advice on this.

Again, what I said above. Their decision is not yours. You're mad about something, but your opinion won't change Apple's behavior.


===================
Now here's my opinion:

As a stockholder and investor, I generally prefer companies to NOT be making contributions like this. But I'm not going to get my way either, because I'm not a majority shareholder. But I can always decide to sell my shares if I am very dissatisfied.

I'm not dissatisfied. As long as Apple is following the law wherever it operates, then I'm "mostly good". As long as Apple is doing a proper budget and has categories for philanthropic giving, I'm okay with that too. Sure, I'd rather they didn't, but again; not my decision.

Well, that's it. Have a great day!
By law, they’re required to buy off political candidates so that taxes will be so low that we can’t prevent fires and provide relief to fire victims through the government, and it’s the largest corporation in California that has the money to provide this relief, and nobody else, because that’s how they dealt the cards.
 
If we criticize companies for doing shady things, we should also acknowledge when they do good things. I think this is a good thing, I hope that it helps a lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mech986
As much as we complain about Tim Cook he actually donates to charities. Steve Jobs almost never if ever did.

This post is worthy of a downvote? Wow.
Steve Jobs kept his charity work private.

If your prime suspect for the $150 million anonymous donation to the Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of California, was anyone other than Steve Jobs, then you live in Gotham city and do not know Bruce Wayne is batman.

Also check out the subtopic "Philanthropy" in the link below.
 
Truly terrible! And the summer wildfire season hasn't even started!

When will the climate change deniers finally say "we were wrong"? These fires are not "natural". Earth's natural weather patterns are severely distorted, and this is the cost. It's happening, now. It's time for us humans to change our ways of life.
 
I just lost everything in the Eaton Fire. I’d say a great thing Apple could do - without much impact to their bottom line - is provide a discount to us to replace our devices. I’ve got a Mac mini, AirPods Max, and iMac I can show them on Find My in the disaster area:

IMG_2094.jpeg
 
Isn't Apple Fitness+ Studio located in L.A. ?
AFAIK one of their trainers (Josh) lost his home a few days ago.

I know it doesn't change anything, but I'm sending positive energy to anyone who's living in L.A. right now... this is absolutely crazy, and let's hope for the best after all of this is over...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.