No problems yet with my air 2 hard to believe its almost 2 years old, maybe ill wait til 2018 to update. Ill see what the next ones have however. Can we have matte black please? 
same here I was going to replace my kids iPad mini 2 - their apple care ran out and the A7 is showing its age but I will hold up - at a minimum the mini 4 will likely drop in price when the 'pro' ones are released.i guess i won't get a new iPad this Christmas, I will wait until the spring to update my iPad Air (1), typical Apple, selling old devices during the holiday season, then cash in on the new ones early the following year(that business model works for them though $$$)
There always (except for the very beginning) have been two models per size. We are having five models right now.Within the supposed "Pro" line, that would be true. But the existence of a "Pro" series implies the existence of another ("consumer") series as well. So that suggests more than 3 models - maybe 6.
It's really amazing how many people get their panties into a bunch over a name.There's no need for a Pro designation (or Air) in the iPad lineup anymore. Just offer 3 standard sizes and be done with it.
if you mean more sales no - if you mean more revenue then yes - the 'pro' models will all run $ 100 more expensive.And this is going to turn the iPad sales around ?
So what exactly about today makes it better for Apple to release multiple mediocre products instead of one great product? The market is more diverse so let's serve them all poorly instead of picking one audience to serve well? I guess you can take in more total profit that way, but I feel like the long term cost to the Apple brand will be too high. I can't even whole-heartedly recommend Apple to friends and family any more, and even if I tried, it's really difficult to explain which product is right and which to stay away from.
If they're all "Pro" models, then shouldn't they just be called "iPad"? Pro is supposed to distinguish the model over a lesser model of the same generation.
I have to disagree.
A streamlined product line made sense when Apple had limited resources and couldn't afford to engage on too many fronts. So it was better off focusing all its resources on making one great product than 2 mediocre ones.
Apple today is a lot richer, has a lot more resources at its disposal, and serves a way wider clientele. I don't think Apple can cater to so diverse a customer base with just 1 or 2 iPad variants.
3 variants of iPhones and iPads sound about right.
Fragmented? The end result will be three harmonized models, differentiated by screen size.
BTW, it was Jobs who introduced the concept at Apple of Good, Better, Best - establishing three base price points for different models within the same family (though performance was often the differentiator).
I can see the iPad taking lineup cues from the MacBook where more powerful Pencil enabled iPad Pros would be slated for work while lower powered iPads would be for general use. The Pro line would suit the larger and medium screen where the smaller screen of an iPad Mini does not at all seem suited to pro use.
I'd have the lineup look like this:
iPad Pro (A10x, True tone display, Pencil)
12.9" (128GB, 256GB)
9.7" (128GB, 256GB)
iPad (A10)
9.7" (64GB, 128GB)
7.9" (64GB, 128GB)
I will never buy an iPad without a real operating system. iOS works great on my 6S Plus, which is essentially a small tablet. iOS just won't suffice for something as expensive as an iPad.
Within the supposed "Pro" line, that would be true. But the existence of a "Pro" series implies the existence of another ("consumer") series as well. So that suggests more than 3 models - maybe 6.
There's no need for a Pro designation (or Air) in the iPad lineup anymore. Just offer 3 standard sizes and be done with it.
Glad for the mini, though increasing the price in a time when demand is less doesn't seem like the right strategy.
Isn't the iPad Pro basically the same price (within ~$50) as the iPhone?
Agreed, when everything is pro is anything actually pro?If they're all "Pro" models, then shouldn't they just be called "iPad"? Pro is supposed to distinguish the model over a lesser model of the same generation.
iPad Pro is already light years ahead of all the competition. I definitely can't wait to see what Apple has planned for us next with these next generation iPads.
You are not alone. Many people don't understand that Apple has changed its naming convention for iPads to have major revisions and minor revisions comparable to software. Major revisions indicate significant change in design... iPad, iPad Air, iPad Pro.I'm really not a fan of the whole "Pro" designation that Apple is using for these. Just call it the iPad and the iPad S. There is nothing pro about simply bumping the specs slightly.
3 variants of iPhones and iPads sound about right.
variants in size - yes.
variants in spec between those sizes - v frustrating.
so the most insignificant update will have the 10" tablet
[doublepost=1475500181][/doublepost]
no,the 9.7 will be the next 10"
iPad Mini 5 (7.9 inch)
iPad Air 3 (9.7 inch)
iPad Pro 2 (12.9 inch)
This is how to name your product line, Apple. I'd be happy to take over for whatever marketing guy thought it was a good idea to not name the iPad Pro 9.7 the iPad Air 3. Yeah you might get a slight sales bump in the short run because "Pro" sounds cool and you can raise the price or whatever, but it makes it more confusing going forward.
If they have the "courage" to remove the headphone jack on iPhone 7, why don't they have the "courage" to make an iPad called the iPad Air 3 at 32 GB of storage and the $600 price point to streamline the naming scheme for future use? It's obvious that that $500 price point was difficult to stick to for them (what with iPad releases being slower than iPhone releases). Is the Smart Connector and Apple Pencil support really enough to say "well, it's officially pro now, no other thing to name it."
Still not sure why Apple's naming scheme is so out of whack for iPads and MacBooks.