Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Although I am cuban, I have not been the biggest fan of Eddy. However, it is nice to hear him validate something that I have been saying for a while. Namely that many people, the casual gamers, will use the Apple TV instead of buying PlayStation, XBOX or Wii. But I have gone further and stated that I believe those in between casual and hardcore are also migrating away from a dedicated game console. Even hardcore seem to be migrating to PCs. Bottom line, the hay days of consoles are coming to an end. Mind you, they will continue to be around, but as the iphone, ipad, and ATV eat into the bottom end and the PC on the upper end, the console is going to get squeezed into a niche. I gave them 5 years. that was about a year ago, so I am at 4. Let's say by 2020, dedicated consoles will be around but more of a niche thing than a mainstream thing.

I own both a PS3 and PS4, though I am by no means a hardcore gamer. I hardly ever play with them anymore because of the lack of games I actually like and because of the pain in the ass involved in operating those consoles.

Turning on a console takes several minutes, potentially followed by hours if it needs to download one or more software updates. While in use I need to open the sliding door on my media console because of the ridiculous amount of heat the devices generate. Games take way too long to load initially and when transitioning to different levels. The remotes are a pain in the ass to remember to charge, and they take too long to do so. It's also a pain to have to constantly switch the TV input between different sources.

In contrast, with the Apple TV 4 I can download and start playing a game in seconds. The device generates no discernible noise or heat, so no need to keep my media console opened. I can switch between different games, movies, and tv shows as quickly and easily as switching between apps on my iPhone.

So yeah, I definitely see the value of gaming on the new Apple TV.
 
Last edited:
Yes this!! I just said the same thing above in response to freediverx. I'm shocked it took so many posts for us to bring it up first. It would be a reverse AirPlay situation, but it's completely possible with third party apps right now so, easy for Apple to do it.

The TV UI is the dumbest thing I've ever seen. It's set up like a touch screen, in a grid that the remote has to navigate one by one. Imagine if you had to navigate your iPhone screen to select apps with the Home button, going line by line until you got to the app you wanted? The old Apple remote was actually easier to use than the new Siri remote, because you had a physical button that confirmed the step by step movement, with the slider (and is is the same problem I have with the remote app) I'm always guessing how far I'm moving, and have to pay careful attention to the screen. With the old remote if I new I needed to move over four icons, I just press the button 4 times.

This is long overdue, and at a minimum the mirrored screen remote is a must for the TV UI as it exists today. For those who want a dedicated remote, Apple should "dumb-down" the iPod Touch, or morph the iPod nano into a dedicated Siri remote with integrated screen mirror. And keep costs down by offering it as an optional remote purchased separately for those who prefer to use their iPhone or iPad.

I agree! However, if I remember right, you can tap (instead of swipe) on one side of the screen in the Remote.app to get the cursor to just move over one space. I thought that I read somewhere that the same is true for the new Apple TV Siri Remote, simply tap toward the edge of the glass. Correct me if I'm wrong. (I'm still using the ATV 3 as it does everything I need it to.)
 
OK. Great. But it wasn't. Yet everyone and his relatives keep on saying it should have been released with the tv4. But it wasn't. What good does it do to say it should have been released over and over and over again. My lord! Give it a rest already. There was a reason is wasn't. Stop complaining already and move on. The signal to noise ratio here keeps on getting lower and lower. Soon there won't be a single non complaining post to be found and the only people populating this forum will be the moaners and groaners.
The pot complaining about the kettle. Ironic.
 
Siri/Search on the new Apple TV is completely useless to me until it indexes/searches my Home Shared iTunes library of over 1,000 movies. 95% of the content I watch on the ATV is content I already own and have stored locally.

It seems ludicrous that if I ask it to play "Avengers", which is among my "Purchased" movies, Apple TV wants me to stream it over the internet rather than play it from the HD on my computer which is connected to the ATV. Apple is still under the delusion that everyone has fiber run to their homes and no data caps.

I'm in the same boat (well, not with 1,000 movies, but still lots), and this limitation just reflects how poorly thought out the AppleTV experience/ecosystem is. The entire purpose of this device is to aggregate entertainment through one channel (and give Apple a cut of the revenue of purchases), but if it doesn't incorporate all my content, it is already failing. Can you imagine if iTunes didn't allow you to add your own CDs? Of course not - it never would have survived, so why make it difficult for me to use my own videos?

Another poorly thought out piece is the unneccesary limitations that were put on the controllers so that all games can use what most people agree is not a good remote control. Can you imagine if iTunes only played genres of music that sounded good with their built in speakers? Of course not, so why place these artificial limitations on AppleTV?

I look at the xbox and see people connecting their cable box to it, and watching Netflix, and playing games from Windows, and it makes me wonder how can Apple be getting this so wrong? We can all agree that the inclusion of apps was a good choice, and I'm not about to jump ship from my Apple ecosystem just yet, but I see other companies innovating and solving the problems I have with living room technology, and it makes me wonder if I shouldn't start hedging my bets a little.
 
I'm sorry son, but you can't have every imaginable thing all at once right now.
I think it's that Apple has established a precedent of their own on quality. Apple has long made every effort to have everything perfected, or at least within reason. He'll look at their promotional videos on products, hardware and software, look at the precision that went into the iPhone 5 build, the Apple Watch, the Mac Pro. This is a company with resources, both funds and man power. This isn't a garage outfit pulling bob to help thread a screw to fit this motherboard. There are literally independent teams that are coordinating with other teams for each product, both hardware and software. It has been reported that sometimes the software teams will put help out other teams in crunch time to ensure a product is released on time, (OS X help iOS and vice versa).

In the end Apple, Steve Jobs created this reality distortion that really worked because things that were to work together harmoniously were put out together. There weren't lapses in 'it just works'. The new Apple TV didn't have app remote support until yesterday, that's over a month lapse. Really not what we have come to expect from Apple HQ.

Not here to bash or defend; just to clarify that unfortunately Apple is losing its balance. For a more extreme analogy, it's like Apple releasing the Apple Watch in April, but the bands in June. Not very Apple like right?
 
It's a beautiful world where people who see the appeal of using an app on their iOS device which has its own display, and those who think that such an app is completely superfluous can live together in perfect harmony, each respecting the other's unique preferences.

The Remote app doesn't make use of your phone's display. It just turns it into a blank trackpad.

I'm not disrespecting others' preferences. I'm just trying to understand them.
 
I'm understanding Apple less and less these days. Sometimes they kill off beloved products because of their devotion to focusing only on the few things that matter most. And other times, we get news like this.

Given that Apple TV 4 owners already have Siri functionality in their remote, and given that Apple (finally!) updated tvOS to work with the Remote app, why on earth should Apple be wasting so much energy (conceivably for another six months plus) to add Siri functionality to said Remote app, which the vast majority of users only need for typing an occasional password?

Eddy, how about an ETA on that Universal Search API Apple promised months ago?
I dislike the remote (don't use it) and now that the app will have Siri, I'll definitely use that just for Siri inquiries. Pretty simple.
 
Bull. Siri on my iPhone works just fine with Apple Music. You are seriously delusional if you think that for every single language Siri supports, there are adjustments for every single country where Siri use is enabled.

With Apple Music, Siri is referencing an online index of available content. There is no online Siri index of the media you have stored on your computer at home. Additionally, some (most?) people don't do a very good job of managing the meta data for movies and tv shows on their computers. Unless this data is available and formatted in an Apple-friendly format, browsing this content would look like crap on the Apple TV's interface. Finally, when you watch your own content locally, Apple can't charge you for it. So they put all their efforts into features that will nudge you towards buying or renting content from iTunes or their business partners.
 
Been thinking a lot lately about all the complaints I see here... some valid, some very narrow and self serving. But also been thinking about the competition these days... MS seems to be getting their act together... Google of course continues to speed along in service development and Amazon seems to be leveraging Prime accounts like crazy to make them the media and purchasing hub.

With that all said... everyone seems to be nipping at Apple's heals and although I think Apple has made some very good decisions over the Tim Cook days, I do think they need to start getting more aggressive in certain areas... even if that means buying their way in with the billions they have in cash. AppleTV needs to have the most kick-butt programing package out there and there has to be games with more substance and stickiness. Apple needs some original programing... Netflix is killing this one right now. Siri needs to get smarter faster. Apple Continuity needs to get easier and promoted more so that iDevices and Macs are 100% seamless in data sharing and function sharing. And lastly, I think Apple should get more aggressive on the specs for Macs... time to notch it up in the spec department and trim back some on the margins in order to add value.

Note... price for me is not the issue. I don't mind paying for products that last, and products that exceed my expectations... but otherwise, it really seems like it's time for some "wow" factor and time for Apple to really get aggressive or they will become the new, Ballmer days Microsoft.

My thoughts and rants are done now. :) Yippee for a new AppleTV app coming!
 
Yes this!! I just said the same thing above in response to freediverx. I'm shocked it took so many posts for us to bring it up first. It would be a reverse AirPlay situation, but it's completely possible with third party apps right now so, easy for Apple to do it.

The TV UI is the dumbest thing I've ever seen. It's set up like a touch screen, in a grid that the remote has to navigate one by one. Imagine if you had to navigate your iPhone screen to select apps with the Home button, going line by line until you got to the app you wanted? The old Apple remote was actually easier to use than the new Siri remote, because you had a physical button that confirmed the step by step movement, with the slider (and is is the same problem I have with the remote app) I'm always guessing how far I'm moving, and have to pay careful attention to the screen. With the old remote if I new I needed to move over four icons, I just press the button 4 times.

This is long overdue, and at a minimum the mirrored screen remote is a must for the TV UI as it exists today. For those who want a dedicated remote, Apple should "dumb-down" the iPod Touch, or morph the iPod nano into a dedicated Siri remote with integrated screen mirror. And keep costs down by offering it as an optional remote purchased separately for those who prefer to use their iPhone or iPad.

I never knew it until recently, but you can tap the trackpad (top, bottom, left, right) to work the same as the old remote. My roommate prefers that while I prefer to swipe.
 
I always appreciate the extremist excuses my fellow Apple consumers will make for Apple.

But Apple is not exactly a tiny company lacking human or cash resources. It wouldn't take "everyone" to make anything happen at Apple. And (IMO) 3.5 years is a LONG TIME for even a relative tiny subset of "everyone" to get something as commonly used as the remote app updated for the launch of the "4."

Apple has positioned itself as a "just works" company. Some of us expect them to deliver on that. And it's not "just works*" where the asterisk means "after 5 software updates in coming months"- it's "just works" right out of the box.

So again, I appreciate the spin but this seems like a detail that should have been ready at launch (IMO). We Apple consumers should not feel like beta testers for fairly mainstream parts of the "just works" experience.

While I share your frustration, it's important to note that Apple is not organized like other companies. They do not have separate, self-contained product teams, each with its own designers, developers, testers, etc. They have unified teams for those functions, and they prioritize and schedule when those teams will be working on specific products. So when it's all hands on deck for an iOS or iPhone release, nobody is working on anything else.
 
I'm in the same boat (well, not with 1,000 movies, but still lots), and this limitation just reflects how poorly thought out the AppleTV experience/ecosystem is. The entire purpose of this device is to aggregate entertainment through one channel (and give Apple a cut of the revenue of purchases), but if it doesn't incorporate all my content, it is already failing. Can you imagine if iTunes didn't allow you to add your own CDs? Of course not - it never would have survived, so why make it difficult for me to use my own videos?

Because there's no money in that for Apple. And Apple seems more than ever before to be chasing revenue & profits more than anything else. At least we used to have the illusion that ideas like "just works" and "customer experience" were above revenue & profit chasing. Increasingly now (IMO anyway), it feels more and more like the accountants are dominating the decision-making. It's the only way I can rationalize some of the larger decisions.

Nothing wrong with a corporation trying to maximize profits- that's normal. Apple has simply done a good job historically of making us think they are different than normal corporations. Whether they are- or were- I don't know. It simply seems or feels like Apple is becoming more about shareholders than customers than at any time before (IMO).
 
While I share your frustration, it's important to note that Apple is not organized like other companies. They do not have separate, self-contained product teams, each with its own designers, developers, testers, etc. They have unified teams for those functions, and they prioritize and schedule when those teams will be working on specific products. So when it's all hands on deck for an iOS or iPhone release, nobody is working on anything else.

Again, appreciate the spin on behalf of Apple. In the 3.5 years between "all hands on deck" iOS or iPhone releases, it seems there should have been enough time for the remote app to get updated for the brand new :apple:TV4. If "all hands on deck" have been continuously "on deck" for all 3.5 years, it seems like Apple needs to loosen up the purse strings and get more talent on hand to deliver on more than any one thing at any one time.
 
I use the remote app on my iPad. I use it because its faster than the linear browsing on the Apple TV itself. Like scrolling through movies or music. Also, when browsing on the remote app, movies in my library show up with artwork. Its just a much more pleasant way to browse a large library. I just got an Apple TV4 and the touchpad remote is horrendous! Steve Jobs would never have allowed that to happen. Remember when Apple's mantra was the you don't need instructions to use their products because its intuitive? I don't think that's the case anymore.

Based on the responses I've seen so far, it seems that the devotion to the Remote app is coming from folks that use their Apple TV primarily to stream locally hosted content from their iOS devices, rather than using the Remote app to control the Apple TV directly. That makes more sense to me now.

BTW, this may not be helpful for you if you dislike the Apple TV UI so much, but there's a way you can access your Home Sharing content on your Apple TV 4 using a slick user interface instead of the crappy list-based one Apple provides.

Get Plex. You install it on your Mac and it can access your iTunes media library as well as any specific folders containing movies, tv shows etc. Their Apple TV app is awesome, plus the service lets you access your home content form your iOS devices even when you're away from home.

If not for the Plex app, I would have returned the new Apple TV.

screen-shot-2015-11-02-at-21-53-43.png


156989.png
 
Siri/Search on the new Apple TV is completely useless to me until it indexes/searches my Home Shared iTunes library of over 1,000 movies. 95% of the content I watch on the ATV is content I already own and have stored locally.

It seems ludicrous that if I ask it to play "Avengers", which is among my "Purchased" movies, Apple TV wants me to stream it over the internet rather than play it from the HD on my computer which is connected to the ATV. Apple is still under the delusion that everyone has fiber run to their homes and no data caps.
I was hoping that the new Apple TV would be more of a media server then another Internet streaming device. Not to be. Sounds like your situation needs a good media sever and thus the Apple TV fails. May I suggest a media sever like Plex that just may solve your issues.
 
The Remote app doesn't make use of your phone's display. It just turns it into a blank trackpad.

I'm not disrespecting others' preferences. I'm just trying to understand them.

You can hide the swipable screen and have a directory of music, tv,and movies and select it from there. As long as it's iTunes media you can operate it without swiping.
 
What about pairing an apple keyboard to this thing.. When will that be enabled.. Tired of sliding back and forth to enter text and passwords... At least the remote app gives me keyboard on my iphone. maybe bluetooth connect keyboard to phone and then use remote app...

Isn't a dedicated keyboard a bit of overkill just to enter passwords occasionally?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.