I have used them, they are worthless for any real work. Please refrain from insulting me, attacking me, or claiming falsehoods about me when you haven't a clue. Thanks.
I totally agree!
Actually a few months ago I was a few meters from buying a "netBook", I was assuming that if my old iBook G4 was still fast enough for basic tasks (battery completely dead and screen as some problems do...) a new "shiny" netbook would do what i needed from a portable. (didn't expected to run Photoshop or "heavy softwares on it)
I tried a Acer Aspire something with windows Xp and the result were so terrible that I had to keep myself from tossing it out of the window.
Then I tried a Asus (don't remember which model but quite new in april) with Ubuntu that a friend of mine was saying great things about, only reaction was a big laugh and wouldn't suggest it even to a 5 years old children.
My solution was work on iPhone when out for 2 months more, save money and get an awesome and not so much bigger MBP 13".
But don't now if OSX can do miracles on this machines as it seems by some of the posts, never tried a "hackintosh", maybe it's just Windows the problem.
What i want to say is that, many of us "hating" netbooks have tried and seen what they can do, and simply that is not what I mean for working! Or at least if you can work with such delays and wait time in wich the computer hangs and you have to cross your fingers, it simply means that you can afford working much less then me, and especially are way more patient...
We are here beacouse we use Macs, and we have been spoiled by a great study around user experience, so those slow and crappy typewriters (AKA netbooks) aren't good enough. Apple would NEVER release something with such a terrible experience as the netbooks I tried gave, and if they where to, it would mean that Jobs and all the good people at apple aren't there anymore. (only exception to this was my Performa 6200 wich was total crap.... Jobs wasn't there then do...)
Ps. sorry for the english...