Seems kind of low, I gotta believe Apple isn't happy about that, they've used to and prefer to be at the top of the heap. Given how many billions they poured into Apple TV +, and below most (all?) of their primary competition, means they have their work cut out
Yeah, interesting chart but borderline nonsensical when you start to really look at it. Between number 5 and the "Apple TV app" having its own entry I'm not really sure what they're measuring, how they are doing it, and why.
I think that's a fair score.
It's less a reflection of the quality that Apple has provided (The software is, far and away some of the best on the market), and more for the fact that, for all smart television's strengths, it's still fundamentally flawed.
To get the most out of Apple TV, you need to be tied in quite tight to the Apple eco-system to enjoy all the base features. I can only speak about the situation here in the U.K, but Android penetration is strong because Apple products are seen as more luxury items and are generally more expensive, even given the inclusion of VAT. Apple TV and streaming simply aren't in the same language here; there are more people likely to use 'Netflix' as a reference for such.
Second, as with other similar products, Apple TV really doesn't 'solve' anything. It simply aggregates a selection of other services that you still need to pay for; and unless you're willing to spend a lot of money to subscribe to all these services, there's no sure-fire way to actually pick up the remote and access a film/TV show that you pick from the top of your head, as Apple's marketing would suggest.
Lastly, the branding is a messy. What is Apple TV? Is it hardware? A macOS/iOS app? An app on the Apple TV hardware? Why aren't the services on the Apple TV hardware the same as on iOS/Mac?
So unless you want the convenience of a more modern U.I, I don't always see such a great distinction between this setup and a cable subscription; or indeed simply purchasing the films/TV shows digitally from iTunes et al.
I think Disney have things spot on at the moment. They waited for the market to mature and played their cards right - the service already feels like it's been out for longer than it has. The content is highly unlikely to disappear after a certain time, and because it's studio driven, it's much easier to know where a particular movie/TV show will be.
Of course, it’s so new there’s not a lot of content. Lots of cool projects coming up though.
The score isn’t a reflection of Apple TV, it’s a reflection of Apple TV + (Apple’s Netflix competitor).I think that's a fair score.
It's less a reflection of the quality that Apple has provided (The software is, far and away some of the best on the market), and more for the fact that, for all smart television's strengths, it's still fundamentally flawed.
To get the most out of Apple TV, you need to be tied in quite tight to the Apple eco-system to enjoy all the base features. I can only speak about the situation here in the U.K, but Android penetration is strong because Apple products are seen as more luxury items and are generally more expensive, even given the inclusion of VAT. Apple TV and streaming simply aren't in the same language here; there are more people likely to use 'Netflix' as a reference for such.
Second, as with other similar products, Apple TV really doesn't 'solve' anything. It simply aggregates a selection of other services that you still need to pay for; and unless you're willing to spend a lot of money to subscribe to all these services, there's no sure-fire way to actually pick up the remote and access a film/TV show that you pick from the top of your head, as Apple's marketing would suggest.
Lastly, the branding is a messy. What is Apple TV? Is it hardware? A macOS/iOS app? An app on the Apple TV hardware? Why aren't the services on the Apple TV hardware the same as on iOS/Mac?
So unless you want the convenience of a more modern U.I, I don't always see such a great distinction between this setup and a cable subscription; or indeed simply purchasing the films/TV shows digitally from iTunes et al.
I think Disney have things spot on at the moment. They waited for the market to mature and played their cards right - the service already feels like it's been out for longer than it has. The content is highly unlikely to disappear after a certain time, and because it's studio driven, it's much easier to know where a particular movie/TV show will be.
I think branding is an issue. Ask an average person what Apple TV+ is and they have no idea it even exists let alone has original content.
Do I know how it shoud‘ve been branded and packaged? No... but I don’t get paid to do those things. Lol
It's free for a reason....it sucks. Thsrs without even getting into the hardware audio formats issues with Hulu. Alot of audio only plays in 2.0.“Value”... for most, it’s basically free.
In 2020 I have watched more stuff on TV+ than Netflix, just finished Defending Jacob. Best so far: Servant.
The thing that’s still missing is one mega-hit like The Mandalorian, but Apple has the resources and the will to make it happen, imo.
I think the Mandalorian is actually utterly mediocre. If it wasn't Star Wars and didn't have a cute gimmick I don't think it would have attracted any attention at all.“Value”... for most, it’s basically free.
In 2020 I have watched more stuff on TV+ than Netflix, just finished Defending Jacob. Best so far: Servant.
The thing that’s still missing is one mega-hit like The Mandalorian, but Apple has the resources and the will to make it happen, imo.
If you haven't watched a second, how can you say it's "crap" content?Crap content. Got a year free with my new SE and haven't watched a second.
Indeed, I don't really get the rankings.“Value”... for most, it’s basically free.
In 2020 I have watched more stuff on TV+ than Netflix, just finished Defending Jacob. Best so far: Servant.
The thing that’s still missing is one mega-hit like The Mandalorian, but Apple has the resources and the will to make it happen, imo.
This is a pointless comparison. There is no SIGNIFICANT difference among any of these; they are essentially all tied for first.
Apple TV+ is considered to be "below average" for both value and original programming when it comes to customer satisfaction, according to new data shared today by the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI).
Apple debuted in the 2019-20 U.S. annual index in 12th position, with a customer satisfaction rating of 74 out of 100, tying both Google Play and HBO.
![]()
Topping the index was Disney+ with a first-time score of 80 out of 100, which puts the new streaming service ahead of former leader Netflix, with 78 out of 100. Like Apple TV+, Disney+ launched in November.
Elsewhere this year, Hulu (now controlled by Disney) closed in on Netflix, up 1 percent to 77 out of 100. Likewise, the Apple TV app is up 1 percent to 77 for customer satisfaction.
Netflix remains the largest streaming service by far, with about 183 million subscribers worldwide. Apple hasn't released subscriber numbers and has a large number of non-paying customers as the company has been providing everyone who has purchased an Apple device since September with a free year of Apple TV+.
Apple is reportedly in the process of purchasing older movies and shows for its TV+ streaming service in a bid to build a back catalog of content, which will put it in a better position to rival the huge libraries available on Netflix, Hulu, and Disney+. As the ASCI report notes, it will be interesting to see if this improves customer satisfaction in the future.
The telecoms report shows that with more and more Americans stuck at home, video streaming overall has seen a boon in customer satisfaction among telecom industries. With a stable ACSI score of 76, video streaming now outpaces subscription TV by a gap of 12 points.
Article Link: Apple TV+ Ranked 12th in Customer Satisfaction Index for Video Streaming Services
You were making a joke, right?I really like the appLe tv+ content. I think in 5 years, Apple TV+ will be the new HBO.
The Apple TV app is a buggy pile of garbage littered with ads. Apple cannot be good at services without being great at software. They need to wake up to the issues they have.
id be willing to bet a better UI would bump it up quite a few spots.74 out of 100? I'd say that was a win given the current amount of content.