Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
apple-tv-rebrand-icon.jpg

8f97c33943f75a2003555189a9a27002c8d46b84.jpg


Maybe not too well known outside of the UK, but it immediately made me think of Central Independent Television, funnily enough one of the UK's regional ITV stations, the same ITV that scuppered the naming of the original iTV box.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TumbleDryer
View attachment 2567389

This cracks me up so much.

It's like their whole "design" team just discovered Photoshop filters for the first time.

Time really is a flat circle.
I was thinking the exact same thing! LOL. Next there will be flames and marketing material with 'The Hottest new thing'.
 

Attachments

  • macInstaller03.jpg
    macInstaller03.jpg
    42.5 KB · Views: 12
Probably pointed out already, but does the new colors in the TV icon match the top of the HomePod?
 
I have a feeling this was in response to Apple's latest MLB broadcasting. There was genuine confusion from certain age demographics as to where they could watch the games. Just my guess.
Its also likely related to what they are looking to do with F1, and I know that there have been issues with MLS.

The core problem is this just continues the confusion. At least before you could point to different names for items. Now its Apple TV Streaming service and Apple TV Streaming hardware, which is more confusing. It'd be better to name one of them something completely different to avoid the confusion entirely.
 
I disagree. The Apple TV is one of the few streaming devices, including the built in smart tv interfaces, that doesn’t slow down and lag frequently. I’d rather set up my tv as a dumb tv and use an Apple TV than use manufacturer interfaces. This doesn’t even address the data with which your tv phones home (ever read the privacy policy of your smart tv?).
An Apple TV will have a place for a while to come I imagine.
And you, my friend, are in a small minority of users that notices or cares about such things. AppleTV is a niche device.
No, right now the aTV is for people who never want their smart tv to touch the internet, ever, and people who have a smart tv where the smarts suck (most of them).

And most people would prefer it not replace their sound system.
Most people do not care about either of those things. I already said it is for people who care about Apple's interface etc. Most users simply do not; it is a very niche device. Most people use their TV's built in sound system. Adding a better sound system as part of AppleTV would make it far more appealing, because it is something most people would notice, and in combination with the interface benefits, might be enough for it to be mainstream.

Ideally, Apple would make an actual TV set. But we all know the margins on those are too slim. (At least that is what people always say, with panel costs what they are now, perhaps it could be a possibility.) For AppleTV to be a mainstream device, it has to do something other than provide a good interface.
 
  • Love
Reactions: FriendlyMackle
Its also likely related to what they are looking to do with F1, and I know that there have been issues with MLS.

The core problem is this just continues the confusion. At least before you could point to different names for items. Now its Apple TV Streaming service and Apple TV Streaming hardware, which is more confusing. It'd be better to name one of them something completely different to avoid the confusion entirely.
Great point, I fully agree!
 
And you, my friend, are in a small minority of users that notices or cares about such things. AppleTV is a niche device.

Most people do not care about either of those things. I already said it is for people who care about Apple's interface etc. Most users simply do not; it is a very niche device.
Which is kinda the point… it’s aimed at folks who dont want to use the “smart” features on their tv for one or more of a few reasons, and people deep in the apple ecosystem.

I do, however, think you underestimate the size of the niche, or the halo effect (for example I got my in-laws an AppleTV for Christmas last year because they were complaining about how much the amazon fire interface they were using lagged and sucked, and they both use iphones so they love the integration now too, and since then they’ve recommended getting one to several other folks)
Most people use their TV's built in sound system. Adding a better sound system as part of AppleTV would make it far more appealing, because it is something most people would notice, and in combination with the interface benefits, might be enough for it to be mainstream.
Maybe, but it would also lose much of their *current* market for the device, including the folks who are deep into Apple’s ecosystem overall. big risk, uncertain reward

For AppleTV to be a mainstream device,
The question is does Apple actually want that? Jobs referred to the AppleTV as a “hobby”, it’s always seemed to me to be a higher end product with a set of particular niche targets, and that’s been the whole point of the product (relative to the general streaming device grouping). Not everything needs to cater to broader markets and doing so may risk losing its dedicated fan base that makes it successful at all and ruining the product line entirely
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlyMackle
I can't tell if that's a serious suggestion but it's funny either way.

It wasn't just technology that cause the proliferation of piracy, it was seeing the western world go from largely being run by corporations to almost entirely - everything in sight bought up and squeezed for profit no matter what the cost to society. So maybe Apple's "content" is good enough to pay for but, being one of the largest corporations in the history of the world, they are part of the overall problem and, in my opinion, absolutely deserve to have their **** stolen at ever turn.
I wouldn’t go that far, though I do agree about the power of global corporations.
If no one pays for video/film/tv-programming—they will stop making media other than garbage ad-fuelled lowest-common-denominator ‘quality’ ‘content’ and probably consisting of only AI actors, writers, etc. I mean, they’re going to try and foist this on us anyway, but if no one is willing go pay, well, what can we expect? Certainly not a better situation.
 
I wouldn’t go that far, though I do agree about the power of global corporations.
If no one pays for video/film/tv-programming—they will stop making media other than garbage ad-fuelled lowest-common-denominator ‘quality’ ‘content’ and probably consisting of only AI actors, writers, etc. I mean, they’re going to try and foist this on us anyway, but if no one is willing go pay, well, what can we expect? Certainly not a better situation.

The only good news there is the piracy problem will take care of itself!

Nobody will even bother to pirate AI slop movies and TV

😅
 
AppleTV is a concept. And the concept can take many forms. But still the same concept. Spirt of the law not the letter of the law.
 
It’s just a total mess.

It’s got an inner shadow, so we are led to believe visually that the apple logo is below the black surface area, but then for some reason, the Apple logo itself is bubbly and sticking up.

I can’t even guess what the aesthetic they are going for actually is.

This is just absolute amateur hour design work.

Literally the kind of stuff teenagers in their basement come up with their first time through with Photoshop
Like the initial 'hello, bonjour' etc when you first update to Version 26. Frankly embarrassing.
How is that confusing? To me, it’s no more confusing than using the Netflix app to access the paid subscription to Netflix, or Apple Music app to access the paid subscription to Apple Music.
How is it remotely alike? Try having a set top box by Netflix, called Netflix, which also has a Netflix app on it where you watch Netflix, amongst all the other streaming services - that's a more similar analogy and that is most definitely if not confusing, just very strange.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.