The look of the graphite stainless steel was my favorite thing in that release. I’ve always had aluminum, but boy, I don’t hate that.No titanium edition then? What’s “graphite stainless steel“?
The look of the graphite stainless steel was my favorite thing in that release. I’ve always had aluminum, but boy, I don’t hate that.No titanium edition then? What’s “graphite stainless steel“?
Why?With the blood oxygen sensor, it’s a buy for me to replace my series 4.
More likely a replacement for Ti edition given the comparable material price.Is Graphite Stainless Steel a replacement for Space Grey Aluminium
Watch 6 doesn’t have enough new features so they hard to make the faces exclusive to make up for it.Also new faces exclusive to S6? Surely these should be updated with watchOS7 not hardware.
Curious to see what 20% faster over Series 4 and 5 feels like.
I don't think you'll see a redesign soon. Smaller bezels, a mm larger display, maybe. A new design... nah.same design again
Perhaps I misread but what is the purpose of the O2 integration of its for studies?
what benefit does it provide to the user?
same design again
The fact that they spun the lack of a power adapter as an “environmentally positive” thing is just infuriating! The reality is that Apple removed an essential accessory from the box so they could save on costs and charge you extra to buy it separately. Yet they lie to your face and tell you it’s because it’s “good for the environment.” Such bullcrap. The audacity! Just be honest to your customers.
Nonsense. The sensor is not even close to providing a clinically accurate SpO2 reading.In the Covid era, it's one of the most important metrics to track. If you get Covid and your O2 sat starts dropping, you need to seek medical attention right away. It could help you to avoid a ventilator and a very bad outcome.
is there any data (either from Apple, or an independent source, or ideally both) on how accurate & precise the SpO2 readings are (or are not)? It's good to be skeptical, but let's not make judgements (in either direction) before learning what the facts are.Nonsense. The sensor is not even close to providing a clinically accurate SpO2 reading.
Or you likely already own one (or more), or have a wireless charger, or can use the charging solution of your choice (whether it be cheaper, to your aesthetic liking, or otherwise).
yes, but if multiple other companies follow suit and also remove 10's of thousands of cars from roads, then all that starts to add up to a significant, meaningful impact. Maybe you can argue that Apple could or should do more, but at least they appear to be stepping up, and generally they seem to be at the forefront of environmental consciousness and responsibility amongst large corporations.I'm sorry but REALLY, you are going to justify removing the charger to save on carbon footprint?! Don't take us for idiots please.
They are a trillion $ company, I'm sure they can make a bigger impact than having 50k less cars on the road (which btw is NOTHING) if they were that bothered.
Does anyone know if Apple Watch series 4 does sleep tracking too?
like if I sleep with it? Not sure if series 5 had an advantage over that.
Yes, I think so -- the new sleep tracking capabilities are part of WatchOS 7, so not hardware-based. As long as your AW can run WatchOS 7 you should be able to use the sleep tracking function.Does anyone know if Apple Watch series 4 does sleep tracking too?
like if I sleep with it? Not sure if series 5 had an advantage over that.