The iPad model line-up seems a bit confused. Thought does not appear to have been given to the different practical uses that the mini, iPad (base) and Air are to serve.
In particular the Air. Traditionally it was the lighter model for Apple products (as the name implies). However:
- Current iPad Air 11" (M2) (462g) is 18g / 4.05% heavier than current iPad Pro 11" (M4) (444g)!
- Even across same chip - current iPad Air 11" (M2) (462g) is only 4g / 0.86% lighter than previous iPad Pro 11" (4th Gen / M2) (466g). Hardly enough to justify the 'Air' name.
For the mini - it is unclear if it is intended to be a smaller iPad (base) or instead a smaller Air. Take the screen for example. iPad mini displays have the most superior pixel density of all iPads - 326 ppi. iPads (base), Airs and Pros each have a 264 ppi display. So while for other specifications the mini has a better display than the iPad (base), an equivalent display to the Air, and a worse display than the Pro, it still has a better pixel density. I'm sure someone will say
'that's because you are viewing it from a closer distance', but I'm not sure that is true.
Personally it would be great to see an iPad with a mini size (8" to 9" with small bezels), OLED display, 120Hz ProMotion, no need for the back camera. Essentially just a reading device.
Don't see this happening, sadly!