i hate my school's connection
lol WOW. Where in Boston are ya at? Used to live in Boston, South End, almost ten years ago (wow, that makes me a little sad, time flies lol).
i hate my school's connection
lol WOW. Where in Boston are ya at? Used to live in Boston, South End, almost ten years ago (wow, that makes me a little sad, time flies lol).
That's all there is to this--ringtones. Apple "fixed a bug" with iTunes plus songs not being ringtonable. And they broke all the DIY ringtone methods, and only iToner and that other shareware ringtone software appears to work anymore.
What do you want to know about 7.4.2? It's been like 10 days since the last update, how much do you think they added? iTunes 7.4.2 adds zero functionality to a computer with no iPhone. Really, iTunes 7.4 adds nothing to a computer without an iPhone. So what are you waiting for? Someone to post in about an "Easter Egg" in iTunes 7.4.2 that makes you coffee and toast in the morning?
Agreed. However, at the time I purchased my iPhone (before ringtones) there was no official word on ringtone capability. So, of course owners would find a way to make use of their own ringtones. It wasn't until Apple announced owners had to pay another $.99 that people became irate.
So, in this instance there wasn't much to research and it is fair to assume people got shafted (just a weeeee bit).![]()
Ok, fine, fair enough.
But let me ask: did it occur to anyone prior to or at the time of purchase to ask about ringtone customizability? I would think if I were going to spend that kind of money on a phone I'd want to fully understand all of it's capabilities.
Then, either I would have said "Yes, I want this" or "No, I don't want this." Frankly, it's as simple as that.
My current phone, for example, is a Samsung M610. It supports custom digitized ringtones, but you either have to buy them or move heaven and earth to get your own stuff on there. However, I also only paid something in the viscinity of about $60 after the deal on signing up for a new contract, and as this is one tenth as much as most of you folks spent on your phones, I don't really feel all that bad about it.
Besides, my phone has actual speech recognition on it, and it has (although it's only 2GB at a time) removable flash media storage (microSD, to be specific). Does yours?
Besides, WiFi on a phone? It's nice, but the only time I have any real access to WiFi, I also more-or-less by definition have direct access to my own computer(s), so really, what's the point?
Well I'm not downloading this.
Exactly, and since no statements were made to indicate the possibility, you can have no reasonable reliance. The default assumption is "no, that features does not exist" unless there is evidence given to the contrary.No one could. It could have gone either way
Not really, no.At the time of purchase, it would have been reasonable to assume there would be free ringtone's for songs already owned, or at least the ability to make you own and download them at will.
Exactly, and since no statements were made to indicate the possibility, you can have no reasonable reliance. The default assumption is "no, that features does not exist" unless there is evidence given to the contrary.
I'm not disagreeing with the substance of your post, but merely illustrating the danger of unfounded assumption. You can't buy a product with the thought that "maybe one day it will do more than it does right now" and rely on that purely on internal belief.
To do so would invite nothing but disappointment. Business is a game of minimums.
Not really, no.
You certainly can use your own ringtones if you can get them to the phone. That much is clear and remains true. You can reasonably expect that if you put a file of a supported file type in the appropriate directory, you can use it as a ringtone. You can't extrapolate from there anything further--particularly since it doesn't support OBEX and doesn't have any kind of file browser, and that any custom ringtone service from a company would tend not to be free.
It's not crippled; it's nonexistent.Also, when asked, no one at Apple knew if the bluetooth ObEx on the iPhone was crippled
Yes, exactly. But from a practical perspective, you have to assume it won't happen until you're given proof otherwise. You can't put yourself into a position of buying a product based on what you one day hope it might do.Further, it COULD have gone EITHER WAY, as no official decision for or against ringtones had been announced.
You cannot make assumptions about what those might be, is the point. The only thing that is guaranteed when you buy something is what it does at that point in time. If you buy something merely hoping that something specific will be added to it, you're setting yourself up to be angry in the future.It's a SOFTWARE driven device, and Jobs himself has stated that there are software updates along the way that would enable certain features/programs on the iPhone in the near future. From the horses mouth.
Wow man, thats not just wrong, but WAY wrong! You must not read the end of year articles stating what bands made for touring....60-70 million isn't very far off these days for larger bands such ass Rolling Stones or hell even Nsync made 75 million one year. You think they make that much on the few points they make on cd sales??? Thats not only wrong, its laughable man. Come on, don't claim to have such a benevolent position on the music industry without at least fact checking.
It's dangerous to make an unfounded assumption, as you did, about adding OBEX or iTunes support for free ringtones.
Does this update break/remove ringtones already made/synced?
I don't know why things aren't working for some, but fwiw I was able to use Ringtonator to add tones with 7.4.2. One thing I noticed though, is that it does not seem to work if the filename is the same as something already in your library. But as soon as I change the name, it loads just fine.
What's new in this version:
Addresses an issue with creating ringtones using iTunes Plus song purchases and includes bug fixes to improve stability and performance.