Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Updates Website to Highlight Removal of Apple Watch Blood Oxygen Feature
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
option 2.
The article literally mentions that watches sold from today have a new part number
There was an excellent post about this very subject in December. Hopefully the user who is following the three court cases, continues to update us as things move along.
No, because a watch previously sold as having the feature could have it potentially disabled then, it needs a new product ID so it can be definitively seperated.
“The Blood Oxygen app still works on previously-sold Series 9 and Ultra 2 models.”
Does this mean if someone went to a store today, say Bestbuy or Costco, with still available current stock, that the app would still work (since it was already sold by Apple)?
The wording is vague & confusing.
Does this mean if someone went to a store today, say Bestbuy or Costco, with still available current stock, that the app would still work (since it was already sold by Apple)?
The wording is vague & confusing.
There is no user serviceable way to restore an Apple Watch. Needs to be done in store.
As long as you don't want cellular ones.
Exactly, that's at will employment. Just as they can fire you you are free to leave; in CA NDAs are regulated to prevent companies rom making it too hard to switch jobs.
No, but companies often disagree on their scope and whether they actually infringe. I'm surprised Apple hasn't rolled out some patents it thinks Massimo is infringing on to drive a settlement that cross-licenses them. I would guess, with their patent portfolio, they'd find something.
As iMacDragon replied, one needs a different Product ID to definitively
separate. If one was sold a LL/W at Best Buy it would activate with the O2 function as only Apple is part of the court order.
Last edited:
Yes. Only Apple pulled them, at least the last time they were banned. Since those were already sold by Apple they are not part of the court order.
Yes, this only applies to watches purchased directly from Apple.
Eventually the other retailers will have the updated models in stock but it may take a few weeks for that to happen.
Sure, and once the ban ends simply restock with the old watches that were pulled.
And the sue Massimo when and if the infringe.
Also important as this is a hardware change and not a software one.
So if Apple gets it back by licensing or other means the watches purchased today will never regain this functionality.
Who actually uses the O2 monitor? It is useful in a medical setting, but for most people on daily life?
To me it looks like the feature is there just because it was possible to implement, not because it’s super useful. So, not much is lost.
To me it looks like the feature is there just because it was possible to implement, not because it’s super useful. So, not much is lost.
What does this mean for people who own the model that has the sensor? Will it stop working for them? My wife has a launch day model of the Series 9. I'm also wondering because of my Ultra Series 1, I love the O2 sensor and use it often when I finish my runs.
That would be on new devices where the hardware is added back. Not the ones on sale today.
I wonder if this will make the resale value in September increase if you have one of the original watches that still support it if there is no fix by then
Totally agree. I used it a couple of times on my Series 6 just because it was the "new" sensor. Even now when I go in to look I see numbers usually 97+. It's a reading I've pretty much forgotten about. Same can be said for the EKG (for me anyway). I very rarely ever check it. And the addition of the temperature sensor has done nothing to make me want a newer watch....especially since it only really tracks trends that might be useful to women.
Apple has been adding features just to have news on the newer watches. There's not really anything compelling in the new features. Heart rate and movement are definitely useful but I doubt most people use much more than those on a daily basis. If they made an SE with the same size/screen as the newest watches, I'd be just fine with that.
Blood Oxygen Monitoring was not a "medical grade" feature when introduced, and the watch was able to calculate movement (calories, etc.) without it. So it was a non-essential feature that did little to enhance the experience. So why does everyone care so much?
They didn't remove the hardware, they just turned it off.
Are we sure the hardware is actually removed? Seems more like the distinction that was there for Nike Apple Watches before. Now that there are no longer separate Nike Watches sold, they enabled the watch faces, etc on the non-Nike watches. There's probably just a line of software that checks something that identifies the model and disallows the sensor on these watches....I would bet there's no actual hardware change. And therefore it could be enabled in the future if things get settled and it becomes legal to do so.