Jailbreaking = freedom to do what i want with my device.
Yes, that is what it used to mean. But now it basically means:
Jailbreaking = I don't give a crap about my personal security
Jailbreaking = freedom to do what i want with my device.
Right. My point is when people say it’s my device I can do what I want with it, that’s not really true. I suppose it would be if you could completely wipe the device and install another operating system on it.You absolutely own the device - And you're agreeing to the EULA which states you cannot modify it (software, NOT hardware) at all. Also, you don't own the software AT ALL - you're just allowed to use it. I see your point. Hey - they can probably give you the hardware for free - If you'd agree to pay them for the software usage.
It might be your device but it’s Apple’s software. Have you read the EULA?Jailbreaking = freedom to do what i want with my device.
So you're okay with some dimwit (Siguza) publishing the keys to your "personal property"? Imagine if someone took the keys to your car and house, copied them, and handed them out to every passerby. Are you okay with that? How would you feel?
There's zero good that can come from compromising the Secure Enclave that I can see. Do you think it would somehow force Apple to strengthen the security even more? Yes, that would be good.
Regardless of the long-term benefits, I find behaviour exhibited by hackers like Siguza to be dangerous and irresponsible.
Jailbreaking is legally exempt under US copyright law, if you didn't already know. I see nothing wrong with hacking my own device to customize what i do on it. Also, jailbreaking ends up helping apple as they take ideas from jailbreaks, and they beef up their security in the future.Good, they had every right to do so. Idiots hackers that want to play their little school boy games should be think about the implications go their actions.
You absolutely own the device - And you're agreeing to the EULA which states you cannot modify it (software, NOT hardware) at all. Also, you don't own the software AT ALL - you're just allowed to use it. I see your point. Hey - they can probably give you the hardware for free - If you'd agree to pay them for the software usage.
Jailbreak and research security for all you want, that's a right. Posting encryption key in public that affect the security of all devices out there is irresponsible and undermines the rights of all others.
So you're okay with some dimwit (Siguza) publishing the keys to your "personal property"?
Good, they had every right to do so. Idiots hackers that want to play their little school boy games should be think about the implications go their actions.
No, the exact opposite. I don't care what people do with their devices and I think that they should have the freedom to do that. However, if someone is posting things like encryption keys that could undermine *everyone's* devices because of their personal beliefs or whatever, I think it's reckless and irresponsible.
Jailbreaking is one thing, but trying to crack open the secure enclave is a whole other. That's where your biometric data is stored, and there's absolutely no good that can come from that.
I love simple Google searches.encryption algorithms and keys are protected under copyright law.
There is no copyright on algorithms. ... There are some cryptographic algorithms which are patented, but most are not and some used to be patented (but patents ultimately expire)
At worst a jailbreak makes it so you have to restore the device in iTunes. It's pretty hard to actually brick an iOS device from just jailbreaking it.Yes, there's a much bigger picture involved.
- Consumer buys iPad.
- Consumer jailbreaks/hacks iPad because it's "their" device, right?
- iPad stops working properly.
- Consumer takes iPad, still in the warranty period, to Apple for support.
- Apple has to spend money supporting that hacked iPad, at no fault of their own.
Apple has a responsibility to all of its customers to keep their support services affordable. Anyone that tries to circumvent that for their own personal benefits (jailbreaking, hacking) only raises the costs for everyone, and that's not right.
Today's macOS and iOS is already super capable without going down the road of jailbreaking.
Jailbreaking is one of the dumbest things a human can do aside from playing golf in a lightning storm and hopping the fence to pet a tiger at the zoo.
now I want to hear the story about Asia and Siciliansbut it’s not one of the classic blunders, those involve Asia and Sicilians
The key can’t be copyrighted. That guy posts a lot of bad information.The algorithms can be copyrighted, sure, but the keys? I'd really like to know your basis for how a short, randomly-generated string of letters and numbers can be protected by copyright.
Edit: Unless you don't actually have any basis for this claim. In which case, just call this what it is, DMCA takedown abuse. Corporations get away with it all the time and there are no consequences. Just an occasional "oops, we screwed up" when called out on it.
First off, he’s not a dimwit.So you're okay with some dimwit (Siguza) publishing the keys to your "personal property"? Imagine if someone took the keys to your car and house, copied them, and handed them out to every passerby. Are you okay with that? How would you feel?
There's zero good that can come from compromising the Secure Enclave that I can see. Do you think it would somehow force Apple to strengthen the security even more? Yes, that would be good.
Regardless of the long-term benefits, I find behaviour exhibited by hackers like Siguza to be dangerous and irresponsible.
You’re confusing confusing with conflating... I know, it’s confusing.Reverse engineering the secure enclave (bad!) is not the same as jailbreaking (whatevs), right? Unless I’m wrong, or you can’t have one without the other, it seems that this thread has already conflated the two.
People are delusional if they think it's only a security threat when someone post the key publicly. This forces Apple to improve their security. There are many hackers who are doing exploits for malicious purposes in the background that never goes public.First off, he’s not a dimwit.
If he can get the key, then it is safe to assume others have it also. It is better to make it public and force Apple to do something versus letting people think it is secure.
Interesting use of the DMCA by Apple. I’m no legal expert, but was that an appropriate use? If not, might explain the retraction.
We both know that Apple is about image first. Its evident everytime Tim Cook has an interview but then when you cross check those stories where developer or hacker reports an issue and Apple takes its sweet time then that kinda paints different story, don't you think?Maybe in your world those are binary choices but in the real world involving jobs, revenue, courts, shareholders, politics and customers, those two options both co-exist. It's how well a company navigates those two options simultaneously that matters.
Nope, encryption keys are not copyrightable and DMCA takedown notices can only be used to take down copyrighted works.I’d say it was a perfectly reasonable case for DMCA. It’s Apple IP and not made public by Apple so they have every right to have it removed from public domain.
There is no need for jailbreaking these days... less secure device and far less stable.
Sure, some cute little tweaks, but it was always been cat and mouse. I'm too busy to muck about with it
First off, he’s not a dimwit.
If he can get the key, then it is safe to assume others have it also. It is better to make it public and force Apple to do something versus letting people think it is secure.
Nope. You will get old one day and the time needed for all the stuff in your life will outweigh the effort of doing all those little jailbreak tweaks.I will keep my iPad jailbroken (with checkra1n) no matter what kind of crap Apple tries to do against it. Jailbreaking = freedom to do what i want with my device.
The algorithms can be copyrighted, sure, but the keys? I'd really like to know your basis for how a short, randomly-generated string of letters and numbers can be protected by copyright.
Edit: Unless you don't actually have any basis for this claim. In which case, just call this what it is, DMCA takedown abuse. Corporations get away with it all the time and there are no consequences. Just an occasional "oops, we screwed up" when called out on it.
Right. My point is when people say it’s my device I can do what I want with it, that’s not really true. I suppose it would be if you could completely wipe the device and install another operating system on it.
Exactly! No one is leaking a key, if they can make money of it. If anything, this is a canary, of the fact that iPhones are not even close to being as secure as they are made out to be
Yes it is dumb! People who jailbreak are the sort of people who are likely to wave a loaded gun around saying they have the right to do so and should be allowed to do so, then when the gun goes off and kills someone they moan about why someone did not stop them.Is this a fact or your opinion? Withdrawn. While it might be dumb to you, the jailbreak scene is not as small as you think... and we have our reasons why we continue to do it.
That’s exactly what I was thinking; I appreciate your post.Nope, encryption keys are not copyrightable and DMCA takedown notices can only be used to take down copyrighted works.
Encryption keys could be protected under the DMCA anti-circumvention provisions though, but those provisions are not enforceable through DMCA takedown notices: a court needs to issue a restraining order.
exactly! Hackers like them are mostly in my view idiots who just want their 5 minutes of fame so that they can say "Hey look how cool I am and where is my parade!"So you're okay with some dimwit (Siguza) publishing the keys to your "personal property"? Imagine if someone took the keys to your car and house, copied them, and handed them out to every passerby. Are you okay with that? How would you feel?
There's zero good that can come from compromising the Secure Enclave that I can see. Do you think it would somehow force Apple to strengthen the security even more? Yes, that would be good.
Regardless of the long-term benefits, I find behaviour exhibited by hackers like Siguza to be dangerous and irresponsible.
Reverse engineering the secure enclave (bad!) is not the same as jailbreaking (whatevs), right? Unless I’m wrong, or you can’t have one without the other, it seems that this thread has already conflated the two.
It might be your device but it’s Apple’s software. Have you read the EULA?
Good news for you buddy, there's always going to be exploits and keys published. Security is always changing. This is just a repeat of the "AACS" DVD decryption key that got published and the streisand effect went in full force when they tried to censor it.
Jailbreaking is legally exempt under US copyright law, if you didn't already know. I see nothing wrong with hacking my own device to customize what i do on it. Also, jailbreaking ends up helping apple as they take ideas from jailbreaks, and they beef up their security in the future.
If he’s got it, then the toothpaste is out of the tube. If it’s crackable, and this guy didn’t crack it, it would just be a matter of time before someone did. Better for the world to know it’s been cracked than to continue in blissful ignorance.Why would anyone want a potential security crack of the Secure Enclave? This stores your biometric information and your Apple Pay items. There is nothing good that could come from sharing the encryption key.