Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Is the lack of Vision Pro Showing a Recording Indicated on the Outer Screen a Concern?

  • Yes

    Votes: 40 43.5%
  • No

    Votes: 39 42.4%
  • They'll add it later and call it "Revolutionary"

    Votes: 13 14.1%

  • Total voters
    92
If true, then undoubtedly it's something that will be corrected eventually, but...

I don't know, it's kind of funny to me. I'm trying to think of any scenario at all where the idea of recording other people while wearing Vision Pro isn't disturbing by itself, with or without an indicator. If you're with your family, and you say "hang on I'm going put on the headset so I can record this in 3D"...I'm not sure they need the indicator. If you're walking around in public wearing this thing AND recording people while doing it...you have other problems besides the indicator.
 
Non issue, there are more discrete ways to record than a big AVP in your head. People holding iPhones can easily record or take pics with out any giveaway. Unfortunately, there is no concept of privacy in Public for over a decade. If these were compact glasses, I would be worried. I would expect a guy with Apple Vision Pro to be walking the streets like smart phone users.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Timpetus
You’re constantly being recorded without your awareness if you’re in public.

Still needs an indicator

Heck, you could have a creepy uncle doing this at your house during a family gathering

(I'm not joking -- many of us have "that family member")

That's not in public

Anything recording needs a clear outward indicator

I can't even believe this is controversial

What on Earth is the argument for not having a recording indication?
 
Nobody can see if I walk the street recording or with twitter on my screen. Thinking that secretly filming is harder on a smartphone is just to try to make your own point stronger. But it doesn’t, if somebody wants to film secretly they can already for years.

And besides that its just a non argument all together because of being in public and WITH indicator.

And that makes the subject of this topic plain wrong:

Apple Vision Pro :: No Outward Recording Indicator​


I tested this with a partner and neither of us noticed any obvious white indication on the front.
Which is absolutely, possibly, on us; but, the front screen isn't exactly clear to begin with.

I also respectively disagree - you're heads-up with a AVP, at a 90 degree angle most of the time - looking forward.
You don't normally have your phone at a level view of your eyes, which always seems obvious when someone is taking a photo or recording.

Not necessarily saying this is a privacy concern, I was just curious to know what the community's thoughts were.
I don't know if I would agree that the header is misleading. There may be a white light during recording, which I didn't see, but that isn't a clear recording indicator to the general public. an indicator, maybe, but not one that makes "recording" obvious by any stretch of the imagination.

Although, I do agree that recording in public, is well, legal I believe - so, this is a moot point.
Just surprised Apple didn't make it more obvious.

//
 
If true, then undoubtedly it's something that will be corrected eventually, but...

I don't know, it's kind of funny to me. I'm trying to think of any scenario at all where the idea of recording other people while wearing Vision Pro isn't disturbing by itself, with or without an indicator. If you're with your family, and you say "hang on I'm going put on the headset so I can record this in 3D"...I'm not sure they need the indicator. If you're walking around in public wearing this thing AND recording people while doing it...you have other problems besides the indicator.

I agree 100%.

I guess I was more-so thinking about the recording in public.
And yes, I think you'd have other problems if you wanted to directly record others without their consent.

//
 
This might be the case!

Although, a simple red recording dot with a "recording time lapsed" timer would be more obvious and less light-intrusive in my opinion.
I would think white would be less intrusive than red. Since red would change the color of the subject. And adding a timer would be worse in that the light source would be changing.
 
I'm sorry, I don't get it.

Why would this be an issue? Exactly what problem is solved by showing a recording indicator?

Also: where do you draw the line if you actually want to enforce this arbitrary rule of letting people know when they are recorded?

Wouldn't a blinking light be insufficient in many cases?

Should a device make sure that everybody around you knows that you are recording a video?

Should a device continuously emit a loud sound while recording so that everybody is aware that you are recording a video?
 
I would think white would be less intrusive than red. Since red would change the color of the subject. And adding a timer would be worse in that the light source would be changing.

Entirely possible!

Maybe the short answer is - Apple sees this as a similar low-level privacy concern as a smartphone or iPad, like others have suggested. It's also noteworthy to point out that "you have no inherent privacy in public," like others have suggested.

But, I do think it's credible to mention that Apple screams and advertises "privacy first," and that holding up an iPhone or iPad would be arguably more obvious than recording someone in an Apple Vision Pro - where the facing direction doesn't change/show obvious recording is occurring.

It was also helpful to hear that a "white pulsing" light shows on the outer-screen, but neither myself or my partner noticed this; which, arguably defeats the purpose if it isn't obvious enough. I would not consider this an obvious recording indicator to the general public, especially the large majority that haven't used a VR headset.

Thank you everyone for your comments!

//
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.