Especially if they are going to keep pretending they care about our "privacy"
There is no privacy when you are in public.
Especially if they are going to keep pretending they care about our "privacy"
If you're walking around in public wearing this thing AND recording people while doing it...you have other problems besides the indicator.
So you're saying it does indicate there is recording?
-dan
You’re constantly being recorded without your awareness if you’re in public.
Nobody can see if I walk the street recording or with twitter on my screen. Thinking that secretly filming is harder on a smartphone is just to try to make your own point stronger. But it doesn’t, if somebody wants to film secretly they can already for years.
And besides that its just a non argument all together because of being in public and WITH indicator.
And that makes the subject of this topic plain wrong:
Apple Vision Pro :: No Outward Recording Indicator
Isn't it required in Japan to have a non-muteable shutter sound on phones when taking pictures to alert people?
I guess the obvious one would be that it has an effect on your recording by adding light.What on Earth is the argument for not having a recording indication?
Isn't it required in Japan to have a non-muteable shutter sound on phones when taking pictures to alert people?
If true, then undoubtedly it's something that will be corrected eventually, but...
I don't know, it's kind of funny to me. I'm trying to think of any scenario at all where the idea of recording other people while wearing Vision Pro isn't disturbing by itself, with or without an indicator. If you're with your family, and you say "hang on I'm going put on the headset so I can record this in 3D"...I'm not sure they need the indicator. If you're walking around in public wearing this thing AND recording people while doing it...you have other problems besides the indicator.
I guess the obvious one would be that it has an effect on your recording by adding light.
I would think white would be less intrusive than red. Since red would change the color of the subject. And adding a timer would be worse in that the light source would be changing.This might be the case!
Although, a simple red recording dot with a "recording time lapsed" timer would be more obvious and less light-intrusive in my opinion.
I would think white would be less intrusive than red. Since red would change the color of the subject. And adding a timer would be worse in that the light source would be changing.
Exactly what problem is solved by showing a recording indicator?
Exactly
You've asked the same question three times now. I answered the first time.Clearly letting anyone around the device know that they may be getting recorded.
Why not show such a thing?
That's the question to be asking
Feel free to lobby governments of the world to make it soAnd phones should show if you’re being recorded
There's a reason Japan has an enforced shutter sound when pictures are being taken (that can't be user disabled)
They get it.
Feel free to lobby governments of the world to make it so