Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
My advice: Be very cautious and critical when watching these reviews. It has been said several times that Apple is deeply involved in most of these reviews to shape the early perception/opinion of Apple Vision Pro. If you watch a review 1 or 2 months from now, you’ll probably get an honest, objective review.
And then in June, Apple will show off Vision OS 2 and all those reviews will quickly age.
 
My advice: Be very cautious and critical when watching these reviews. It has been said several times that Apple is deeply involved in most of these reviews to shape the early perception/opinion of Apple Vision Pro. If you watch a review 1 or 2 months from now, you’ll probably get an honest, objective review.
Here's something 100% objective: an 100" 4K OLED flat panel is more expensive than the Vision Pro.
 
I wouldn't fret about that too much.

Some of the people who purchased the 160,000 AVPs over the weekend will likely create their own reviews.


"Makes me wonder what their own confidence is in the product."

Judging by the number of AVPs sold over a couple of days, I imagine Apple's confidence is pretty good. Not bad for a $3,500 brand new product in a new product category.

The sky isn't falling.
This isn't a new product category, just Apple's entrance into it.
 
My advice: Be very cautious and critical when watching these reviews. It has been said several times that Apple is deeply involved in most of these reviews to shape the early perception/opinion of Apple Vision Pro. If you watch a review 1 or 2 months from now, you’ll probably get an honest, objective review.
I dunno, The ones I have watched so far seem reasonably balanced.

Which… might be a problem for Apple, if this is the bes reviewers they could come up with.
Apart from iJustine who delivers the usual gush-piece, the others seem very middle of the road, luke warm.

I mean, even Apple have been lukewarm in their build up hype.
 
I'm not sure how long I'd actually want to wear the silly thing, but 2 hours with that huge battery pack seems inadequate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: User 6502
Joanna Stern's (WSJ) is a pretty good first impression. The cooking example really shows the future potential, but only in a future where this thing is 10% as heavy, not warm, and doesn't cut you off from the real world. Seems like it's just interesting tech for now, but early by maybe 10-15 years.
 
Joanna Stern, WSJ:
Persona = "Botox from hell."
🤣
Great idea but I think it has a lot of work to do to climb out of that uncanny valley I've been hearing a lot about.
Indeed. Personas looks really creepy ... I mean beta.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
A lot of people view this product as a portable device, but I view it more of a desktop computer with the ability to untether for short periods if necessary. It will allow me to set up my workspace or entertainment space anywhere I have a spot to comfortably sit. I can only see myself relying on the battery to move from one spot to another or if I'm using it for cooking (but I think I'll keep it away from steam).
 
No iJustine?

Summary: oh my gooooood, this is amaziiiiiiing, I wish it would come in PINK though! oh my goooooosh

iJustine demonstrating the AVP Marcel Marceau app.

ijustine2.jpg
 
too many parts to click into place / adjust
Until everyone's head is the same size, it's gonna be tough for Apple to sell something that is fully ready-to-go right out of the box. I guess you could get a scan done at the Apple Store before you order and have them ship your custom version to you? That might be an option for the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dj64Mk7
MKBHD yes the others possibly unofficial extension of Apple PR department.
Come on, Nilays video from the Verge is as balances as you can wish for. His conclusion is even that the tradoffs arent worth it. Do you consider that message to be Apple PR? If you haven’t watched the videos, then don’t give comments that are basically calling into question professional journalists unprofessional.
 
These are not reviews. It’s basically adverts, these YouTubers get basically bribed as they know they won’t get the opportunity to ‘review’ future products before their launch should they be less than enthusiastic in their ‘reviews’.
I’ve only watched the half-hour The Verge review so far, but it’s a real review, with a conclusion of “it’s magic until it isn’t” and “not worth it right now” and “unclear if this can ever work well enough for mass-market adoption”.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.