Creating a toxic work environment and sexually harassing an employee...this guy? Never! 🤣
View attachment 2619164
Creating a toxic work environment and sexually harassing an employee...this guy? Never! 🤣
View attachment 2619164
Your watch can only work with the data you provide it. If you spend the entire hour with your arms level to the floor/your desk, even if you're standing, it has no idea (and no ability to get an idea) whether you're standing or sitting. It depends on your forearm being ~vertical, and it also helps to walk around some.It's crazy, right? If I look at the history, the only days I close the stand ring are on lazy weekends when I'm not working at the standing desk, but instead watching TV and standing up for snacks and restroom breaks.
Then there's hope for improvement with a leadership change.It's a great metric in theory, but the Apple Watch is simply very bad at actually measuring it.
The "Stand" ring should really be the "Move" ring (since you need to stand and move around for a minute or so), and the current Move ring should be the "Energy" ring or something.Your watch can only work with the data you provide it. If you spend the entire hour with your arms level to the floor/your desk, even if you're standing, it has no idea (and no ability to get an idea) whether you're standing or sitting. It depends on your forearm being ~vertical, and it also helps to walk around some.
"Stand" is, imo, not the best name for the Stand ring. It's less about simply standing up and more about combating a sedentary lifestyle, and it always has been. You'll notice the hourly reminder says, "Stand up and move a little for one minute".
Agreed, which is why it's so annoying that the "iconic Activity rings" are so front and center and require the standing ring for success, and the app and Health app still show me the disappointing results when I'm looking at something else, which discourages me from opening the app or using the complications etc. Years of this annoying ring makes me happy this leader is gone.it has no idea (and no ability to get an idea) whether you're standing or sitting
Just reduce the “stand” ring target so that it is irrelevant.Agreed, which is why it's so annoying that the "iconic Activity rings" require the standing ring for success, and the app and Health app still show me the disappointing results when I'm looking at something else, which discourages me from opening the app or using the complications etc.
So they investigated themselves and found no wrongdoing? That sounds about right for a big corporation.“
Apple initiated an internal investigation and found no evidence of wrongdoing
“
These situations, from the company’s point of view, are never about “punishment” or “reward”, it’s simply about making problems go away as quick and quietly as possible.So this is the shortcut to retirement? It sounds like a reward not expelling.
Actually it is. https://www.eeoc.gov/harassment“bullying” in the workplace is not a defined crime (by federal or any US state title or code that I’m aware of).
Thanks. It hadn't occurred to me to look for that, since you can only see that setting by "changing" the first two, so maybe the minimum 6 hrs will work better. However, this article has further poisoned my opinion of the Activity rings.Just reduce the “stand” ring target so that it is irrelevant.
“bullying” in the workplace is not a defined crime (by federal or any US state title or code that I’m aware of).
When employees raised concerns about Blahnik's conduct, Apple initiated an internal investigation and found no evidence of wrongdoing, so Blahnik remained in his role. At the time, Apple spokesperson Lance Lin called the NYT report full of "many inaccurate claims and mischaracterizations," but didn't specify which claims the company disputed.
“
Apple initiated an internal investigation and found no evidence of wrongdoing
“
For those who don’t know:
Every company must first and foremost protect itself. That’s why these “investigations” always come up empty-handed. Or conclude that no wrongdoing occurred.
Because, suppose Apple did find some. What would that mean?
Exactly.
The company could be accused of failing to exercise due diligence, inadequate controls, or perhaps flawed policies.
Which would ultimately result in a class-action lawsuit and millions of dollars in compensation.
So no company can afford to indirectly admit that they made a mistake. Especially not in the U.S.
The head of people at any company is sadly not there to support the people/employers but the management.Apple is clearly not the most proactive when it comes to supporting employees or addressing concerns about toxic managers. I had two wonderful years at Apple, but when a new manager took over our team, things quickly deteriorated. Within six months, a colleague was already on sick leave, and I eventually had to resign.