Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,936
39,925


Apple's rumored virtual reality (VR) headset may be released as soon as the first quarter of 2022, according to JP Morgan analysis seen by China Times.

Apple-VR-Feature.jpg


The report, spotted by iMore, explains that the "industrial design of Apple's headset will be close to that of other brands of VR headsets." The headset is said to feature six lenses and an optical LiDAR scanner to map the wearer's environment.

Most of the components for the headset will reportedly be manufactured starting in the fourth quarter of 2021. JP Morgan revealed some of Apple's suppliers for the device, such as TSMC for the device's processor, Largan and Genius Electronic Optical for the camera lenses, and Pegatron for assembly. The report also notes that the headset's supply chain is heavily concentrated in Taiwan.

JP Morgan believes that Apple's VR headset will be targeted at the top end of the consumer market, with pricing being "more expensive than VR headsets currently on the market." This is apparently explained by the cost of the device's materials, which "alone may exceed $500." This mirrors Mark Gurman's recent report that stated Apple's VR headset "will be far more expensive than those from rivals" and "on par with other pricey Apple products, such as the $5,999 Mac Pro desktop computer."

Gurman also said that "Apple has planned to launch the product as soon as 2022," which aligns with JP Morgan's first quarter of 2022 prediction.

Separately, JP Morgan also provided some information about Apple's rumored augmented reality (AR) glasses project. Due to the "extremely difficult supply chain management and industrial design specifications," JP Morgan predicts that Apple's glasses are unlikely to launch within the next 12 to 18 months, and that Apple is conscious to make the device "light, beautiful, easy to wear, and able to withstand long-term use." The need for prescription lenses and customization may also be hampering the move toward mass production.

Rumors surrounding Apple's VR headset and AR glasses have been increasing in recent months, with one of the devices said to be moving into the "second phase of development." Bloomberg recently clarified that Apple is planning to launch a virtual reality headset as a "pricey, niche precursor" to a more ambitious AR glasses product that is set to follow at a later date. Reliable analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said earlier this month that Apple will unveil an unspecified augmented reality device at some point in 2021.

Update: Citing industry sources, DigiTimes is now reporting that Pegatron and Quanta Computer are vying for final assembly orders from Apple for its AR glasses product. Foxconn has reportedly obtained orders for component assembly.

Most recent rumors have centered on Apple's VR headset, which is thought to be much closer to production than its AR glasses, so it is possible that DigiTimes has conflated the two products. Regardless, in view of recent reports, it seems that Apple is focusing on establishing suppliers for its unreleased VR and AR hardware, which suggests that development on the products is continuing at pace.

Article Link: Apple VR Headset May Launch in Q1 2022 With LiDAR and $500+ Price Tag [Updated]
 
Last edited:
If it's cheaper than an Index with knuckles and lighthouses, then I can see it as a winner.

Trouble is they start with a library of zero and will have to convince devs to build for yet another platform.

I'm already annoyed enough about the HTC / Oculus / WMR mess - let alone adding another player to fight it out in this very niche marketplace.
 
If targeted more towards pro users, the time frame for these VR glasses coincides perfectly with the rumored launch of the ‘mini’, Apple Silicon based, Mac Pro. Aka, even if that AS Mini Mac Pro cannot yet compare to the GPU of Nvidia / AMD, the AI-capabilities of the AS Bionic-chips needed for interpreting the Lidar information, could very well give that AS Mac Pro a competitive advantage after all.
 
The headset will be molded specifically to fit Jony Ive’s head. The display will be calibrated specifically for Ive’s eyes. If anyone has problems with this product, it’s their fault for not having the proper anatomy.
 
I figured the starting price for this would be $1,000. If it really were $500, that would get me to bite almost immediately. We got my daughter the Oculus Quest 2 for Christmas. I took a look at it and thought it was pretty cool. I would think Apple might be able to do it even better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iPadCary
$500+ price tag? Apple charges $1000 for a monitor stand, I'm guessing VR goggles are going to be well over $1000; which I guess, is technically above $500. But still, bad wording for the article title.
Absolutely, especially when the summary of the article says "This is apparently explained by the cost of the device's materials, which 'alone may exceed $500.'"

This is obviously all speculation but current high end gaming VR headsets are around $900 (e.g., HTC Cosmos Elite with the Valve Index at $1000) so MR could easily have said closer to $1000 (of course, maybe they don't want to be like the majority of iPad predictions that were suggesting it would cost $1000 so they take the easy $500+ road).
 
So if it's got "six lenses and an optical LiDAR scanner to map the wearer's environment", doesn't that make it an AR headset rather than VR?

Or do I not understand the differences between the two?
 
I have the Oculus Quest 2 and for the price ($300-$400) it's really hard to beat. The lens quality could be better but it's a solid little unit.

However, if Apple were to release a superior unit (I'm guessing yes) for around $500-$700 I'd consider buying. Plus, I feel they would have a better VR game store as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iPadCary
More interested in the glasses then the headset. With that said very interested in knowing how the VR will be different then others already on the market
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnmarki
Trying to think through this: a VR headset would work in two ways, either with it’s own OS for the install of Apps (vrOS? Unlikely), or tethered to an iPhone (or other device (most probably). Once an App is installed, it’d be fully wireless, though an optional belt-mounted battery pack (or one could be built to drape behind the neck, over the shoulders, like a HANS device) would be extra.

Given the Apple Tax, I’d bet:
- $2,000 for the VR headset
- $200 for the extra battery pack that will provide an additional 5hrs of use.
 
If targeted more towards pro users, the time frame for these VR glasses coincides perfectly with the rumored launch of the ‘mini’, Apple Silicon based, Mac Pro. Aka, even if that AS Mini Mac Pro cannot yet compare to the GPU of Nvidia / AMD, the AI-capabilities of the AS Bionic-chips needed for interpreting the Lidar information, could very well give that AS Mac Pro a competitive advantage after all.
Pro users? For a VR headset?
 
  • Like
Reactions: nwcs
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.