Group FaceTime didn't exist publicly until iOS 12.1Does this affect iOS 10 or only iOS 12 ?
Group FaceTime didn't exist publicly until iOS 12.1Does this affect iOS 10 or only iOS 12 ?
It's great that you have the benefit of hindsight, having full knowledge of the bug, the circumstances and edge case that produced it, the extent of the threat, "the obvious" temporary solution, etc.
Serious question, do you, or don't you, believe this woman is seeking fame?
and cnbc and cnn. hmmmmm........
I still want to know why rumor sites felt it necessary to publish the exact steps to re-create the bug. What is the purpose of that? So a bunch of geeks will stupidly try to re-created it with their buddies?Exactly. Now that everyone here knows everything (potentially, possibly/likely not) there is to know about the bug; ie the nature of the threat, the circumstances, extent, having all the potential edge cases explored, a potential solution that addresses the problem that is thoroughly tested, etc, etc. it's a very easy fix for the arm chair QC pundits having the benefit of full knowledge.
NSA hates your idea.I've always wished that the iOS devices had a light to show the camera was on the way the Mac does.
Wow. Apple should have been more transparent about this issue and it should have immediately disabled Group FaceTime. Immediately. For a company that touts privacy and security as its main focus, this is inexcusable.
Now you're going down that obfuscation road. Don't do that bud. Fact is no one here knows everything there is to know about the bug. But you know that already. More of a fact, no one here needs to know anything about the bug. Apple was informed of issue a week ago. The bug is easy to replicate. Once they replicated it, they should have shuttered FT until the figured a solution. Us know the ins and outs is immaterial. Apple knew there was an issue. Even if they didn't jump on it right away, it didn't take them a week to realize there was an issue. Public outcry shouldn't have been needed for there to be a call to action.Exactly. Now that everyone here knows everything (potentially, possibly/likely not) there is to know about the bug; ie the nature of the threat, the circumstances, extent, having all the potential edge cases explored, a potential solution that addresses the problem that is thoroughly tested, etc, etc. it's a very easy fix for the arm chair QC pundits having the benefit of full knowledge.
.
OK has this women posted any of the responses from Apple yet? What was the response to the bug report she filed? What was the response she sent to Apple Security? She already posted a portion of an email on Twitter. Why not post the entire thing (blacking out any personal confidential information)?This has already been answered once in post #108.
What exactly do you want us to do? Burn them in effigy? Go to Android? (because trusting your life to Google is a totally great idea if your concern is privacy, right?) Stop using technology?So, a user finds the facetime bug a week ago and uses Apples official bug reporting channels to report it. The user shows evidence that Apple was contacted a number of times regarding the bug but kept the issue quiet.
It now transpires that a week after the bug was reported to Apple, another user finds the bug and makes it publicly known. All hell breaks loose and Apple shuts down Facetime Group server.
Apple had a week to fix the bug before someone else found it and gave it full disclosure. Now facetime users cannot group chat because of the companies incompetence to fix the bug when it was first reported, and Apple fans still stick by them!!!
Wow. I’m actually surprised Apple didn’t take action sooner. Seems like they care more when these things make headlines.
But also, I’m sure not a ton of people discovered this.
Yes. Every public corporation has a fiduciary responsibility to its share holders. Nothing new or unique to apple here.
OK has this women posted any of the responses from Apple yet? What was the response to the bug report she filed? What was the response she sent to Apple Security? She already posted a portion of an email on Twitter. Why not post the entire thing (blacking out any personal confidential information)?
Somebody notified Apple and didn’t tweet about it maybe?
Right. Because there is nothing in Apple's history to give anyone a reasonable reason to question Apple's motives.The fact that this person was tweeting ever news org under the sun last night yet won’t share the full emails/bug reports or Apple’s response. Sketchy to me. But I guess I shouldn’t be surprised that a site like this believes 100% some random person on the internet. It makes Apple look bad so of course people here believe it.
Hmm they vouch Privacy so much and its becoming a punchline for them...what a joke. Should have never placed those billboards at CES due to this sort of mess................Privacy my A**
People are so naive about how businesses work in particular software works. Unless you are at a small start up it can take days to get even critical information to the engineers and even after that it could take several days to fix or find solutions to a bug even major bugs. It's just not realistic.
Care to be more clear on those accusations? Batterygate?!Right. Because there is nothing in Apple's history to give anyone a reasonable reason to question Apple's motives.![]()
Serious answer. I don't care. You shouldn't either. Whether she's seeking fame, fortune, or just wants to see the world burn... it's immaterial. What you should care about is the state of your devices. That woman's motivations can't affect your devices. Apple's actions, or lack there of, can affect the state of your devices.Serious question, do you, or don't you, believe this woman is seeking fame?
Could be an indefinite amount of time.Does anyone know how long the audio and video would have been recording for? And if I had FaceTime calls go through/ring on my phone and iPad would it record both or just the phone???
Apple has a bounty program for just this reason. Zero credibility for going to a news organization after Apple seemingly didn't give any meaningful response? That seems very responsible to me. It isn't like this person posted how the exploit worked like all of the other news organizations.Asking for money + going to FOX "news" = zero credibility