Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It’s good the iMac isn’t two years out of...

You know what, this could go on for a while.
Awesomely original, nice! Yeah we get it. Mac hardware engineers design then manufacture individually by hand all the watch bands. But really bad math. The iMac was last updated 21 months ago, so it can hardly be two years out of date.

btw iMac is on a two year update cycle: 2015, 2017, 2019. iMac Pro, 12” MacBook, and probably Mac mini and MacBook Air as well. The only Mac likely to continue getting yearly updates (usually) is MacBook Pro. 80% of Mac sales are laptops. Mac mini/Mac Pro/iMac/iMac Pro combined sell less than 4 million/yr in total.
 
Last edited:
why would anyone buy a watch band from apple? Third parties make way cooler bands that work just as well and are a fraction of the cost
Well yes I have been down that road. However, the only band I use now is the 44mm Forest Green leather loop.
It just suits my wrist a way better than all of the "third parties cooler bands" that I bought.
 
It’s good the Mac Pro isn’t 6 years overdue or this kind of news would make me mad...

Why? You want a mac pro made from the same people who makes watch band? Like do you really think this is the reason of the mac delay?
I don’t understand users logic sometimes
 
Going to go out on a limb and suggest the watch band department is probably not responsible for engineering Mac hardware. I could be wrong though.
The worlds biggest tech company has different departments? Get out of town.

Point is, is says something about a company what gets prioritized, and Apple has known for four years the butterfly keyboard has serious issues, and at least that long about the Mac Pro.
 
It’s good the Mac Pro isn’t 6 years overdue or this kind of news would make me mad...
W O O M Y !
WOOMY.jpg
 
I love a watch band but as always you will be able to get excellent copies of these for a fraction of the price elsewhere.

I had a count up - 32 different bands! Fab! Only two are Apple original, black sport from the Series 0 and the new dark grey one with holes for the Nike Series 4 (which is probably my least favourite band of them all)
 
It's the big innovation of the decade. Cough.
You probably meant it in sarcasm, but I do feel that Watch bands are the perfect example of how Apple is in a unique position to marry both technology and design.

The ability to swap out your watch bands is one of the key reasons why Apple watches are as popular as they are. I think it’s telling that Apple has gone so far as to create a new system of allowing users to easily exchange their watch bands with minimal fuss, while the watch industry is still stuck with a more archaic method which is so much more cumbersome (and still they don’t want to improve on this).

A perfect example of design-led thinking at Apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orbital~debris
The worlds biggest tech company has different departments? Get out of town.

Point is, is says something about a company what gets prioritized, and Apple has known for four years the butterfly keyboard has serious issues, and at least that long about the Mac Pro.
More likely it reflects the complexity of the products. I don’t disagree with you that those are important issues. However the solutions likely take much more time than coming up with new watch band colours.
 
You probably meant it in sarcasm, but I do feel that Watch bands are the perfect example of how Apple is in a unique position to marry both technology and design.

The ability to swap out your watch bands is one of the key reasons why Apple watches are as popular as they are. I think it’s telling that Apple has gone so far as to create a new system of allowing users to easily exchange their watch bands with minimal fuss, while the watch industry is still stuck with a more archaic method which is so much more cumbersome (and still they don’t want to improve on this).

A perfect example of design-led thinking at Apple.
So then just out of curiosity, why is apple so aversed at designing MBPs and iMac/Pros with replacable SSDs and RAMs? You know.. technology and design:)
 
So then just out of curiosity, why is apple so aversed at designing MBPs and iMac/Pros with replacable SSDs and RAMs? You know.. technology and design:)

I won’t say that Apple goes out of their way to make ram and SSDs not user-upgradeable, but that keeping them that way isn’t at the top of their priority list.

For example, you can still upgrade the ram on the 5k iMac, but not the iMac Pro. This is likely because redesigning the iMac Pro meant removing the hatch which makes your ram accessible.

Likewise, soldering ram to a laptop takes up less space, which in turn contributes towards enabling a thinner and lighter form factor. So from Apple’s standpoint, a thinner and lighter design is a more portable and better design, one that benefits every user, perhaps even more so than the ability to upgrade your specs yourself, which is a feature not very user might utilise.

It’s pretty much in line with their design ethos of stripping away everything deemed not necessary to the core function of a product, which invariably entails striving to make it as thin and as light as possible.

Sometimes to a fault, but it is Apple’s nature.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: hans1972
I was wondering when this might make the news. The 40mm Sport Loop in Cape Cod Blue has been sold out both in stores near me and online (in Australia) since I bought my watch on Jan 1. I ended up settling for the Nike sports loop in a darker blue.

Most annoying was the sales rep who happily let me pick and choose until I found the watch and band I really wanted with demo units only to discover he couldn’t sell me the band.
 
why would anyone buy a watch band from apple? Third parties make way cooler bands that work just as well and are a fraction of the cost

How much experience do you have with third-party bands? The reason I ask, Even though they resemble Apples bands, they are far from being the same ‘quality’ as Apples bands. Those are two things that are not mutually exclusive. Yes, Apple bands are about three times of what a third-party band might cost, but you receive a much higher quality band and material over third-party. (And yes, I have owned many third-party bands and Apple OEM bands, and I can attest to the differences in terms of quality.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
So from Apple’s standpoint, a thinner and lighter design is a more portable and better design

By more portable you also mean bring more cables, right? I don’t think anyone has ever complained about MacBooks being too thick in the last 8 years
[doublepost=1551925122][/doublepost]
You probably meant it in sarcasm, but I do feel that Watch bands are the perfect example of how Apple is in a unique position to marry both technology and design.

The ability to swap out your watch bands is one of the key reasons why Apple watches are as popular as they are. I think it’s telling that Apple has gone so far as to create a new system of allowing users to easily exchange their watch bands with minimal fuss, while the watch industry is still stuck with a more archaic method which is so much more cumbersome (and still they don’t want to improve on this).

A perfect example of design-led thinking at Apple.

I’m able to swap NATO straps on my omega at will. Im guessing your first watch was an Apple Watch.
 
By more portable you also mean bring more cables, right? I don’t think anyone has ever complained about MacBooks being too thick in the last 8 years
[doublepost=1551925122][/doublepost]

I’m able to swap NATO straps on my omega at will. Im guessing your first watch was an Apple Watch.

Casio, G-shock, then pebble, finally Apple Watch. I look at them and swapping out the steps definitely involves more effort than simply sliding them out like the Apple Watch.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.